Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1995)
Evaluating model fit.
C. Lance, M. Teachout, Terrence Donnelly (1992)
Specification of the criterion construct space: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 77
K. Murphy (1989)
Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over timeHuman Performance, 2
J. Conway, Allen Huffcutt (1997)
Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings.Human Performance, 10
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
R. Katzell, James Austin (1992)
From then to now: The development of industrial-organizational psychology in the United States.Journal of Applied Psychology, 77
K. Murphy (1992)
Personnel Selection in Organizations
C. Viswesvaran, D. Ones, F. Schmidt (1996)
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratingsJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
K. Murphy (1996)
Individual differences and behavior in organizations
W. Bommer, Jonathan Johnson, Gregory Rich, P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie (1995)
ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 48
Gordon Cheung (1999)
Multifaceted conceptions of self–other ratings disagreement.Personnel Psychology, 52
Robert Ployhart, M. Hakel (1998)
THE SUBSTANTIVE NATURE OF PERFORMANCE VARIABILITY: PREDICTING INTERINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN INTRAINDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCEPersonnel Psychology, 51
James Austin, P. Villanova (1992)
The criterion problem: 1917–1992.Journal of Applied Psychology, 77
John Binning, G. Barrett (1989)
Validity of Personnel Decisions: A Conceptual Analysis of the Inferential and Evidential BasesJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
Jeffrey Mchenry, L. Hough, J. Toquam, M. Hanson, Steven Ashworth (1990)
PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINSPersonnel Psychology, 43
K. Murphy, R. DeShon (2000)
INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGSPersonnel Psychology, 53
Michael McDaniel, Deborah Whetzel, F. Schmidt, Steven Maurer (1994)
The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
Steven Scullen, M. Mount, Maynard Goff (2000)
Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 6
H. Marsh, D. Grayson (1995)
Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data.
D. Day, S. Silverman (1989)
Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity.Personnel Psychology, 42
Hogan Hogan, Curphy Curphy, Hogan Hogan (1994)
What we know about leadershipAmerican Psychologist, 6
J. Ghorpade, Keith Hattrup, J. Lackritz (1999)
The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research : A test of three personality scales across two countriesJournal of Applied Psychology, 84
P. Ackerman (1987)
Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives.Psychological Bulletin, 102
S. Mulaik, Larry James, Judith Alstine, Nathan Bennett, Sherri Lind, C. Stilwell (1989)
EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELSPsychological Bulletin, 105
W. Hofstee, B. Raad, L. Goldberg (1992)
Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.Journal of personality and social psychology, 63 1
K. Jöreskog, D. Sörbom (1993)
Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language
K. Widaman (1985)
Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod DataApplied Psychological Measurement, 9
J. Campbell, Jeffrey Mchenry, L. Wise (1990)
MODELING JOB PERFORMANCE IN A POPULATION OF JOBSPersonnel Psychology, 43
W. Borman (1991)
Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness.
R. DeShon (1998)
A Cautionary Note on Measurement Error Corrections in Structural Equation ModelsPsychological Methods, 3
J. Campbell (1990)
Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1996)
Measurement Error in Psychological Research: Lessons From 26 Research ScenariosPsychological Methods, 1
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1992)
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 21
B. Bass, R. Bass (1990)
Handbook of Leadership
Landy Landy, Farr Farr (1980)
Performance ratingPsychological Bulletin, 87
K. Murphy, Richard Shon (2000)
PROGRESS IN PSYCHOMETRICS: CAN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY CATCH UP?Personnel Psychology, 53
D. Ones, C. Viswesvaran, Angelika Reiss (1996)
Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81
R. Vance, R. Maccallum, M. Coovert, J. Hedge (1988)
Construct validity of multiple job performance measures using confirmatory factor analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
Cathy Dubois, P. Sackett, S. Zedeck, Larry Fogli (1993)
Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: definitional issues, prediction, and White−Black differencesJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
A. Ryan, L. McFarland, Helen Shl (1999)
AN INTERNATIONAL LOOK AT SELECTION PRACTICES: NATION AND CULTURE AS EXPLANATIONS FOR VARIABILITY IN PRACTICEPersonnel Psychology, 52
H. Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19
Murray Barrick, M. Mount (1991)
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 44
N. Schmitt, Daniel Stults (1986)
Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod MatricesApplied Psychological Measurement, 10
B. Bass (1997)
Does the Transactional-Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries?American Psychologist, 52
W. Borman, S. Motowidlo (1997)
Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection ResearchHuman Performance, 10
R. Vickers (1995)
Using Personality Assessment for Leadership Selection.
K. Bollen (1989)
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Robert Heneman (1986)
The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 39
R. McCloy, J. Campbell, R. Cudeck (1994)
A Confirmatory Test of a Model of Performance DeterminantsJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
H. Akaike (1987)
Factor analysis and AICPsychometrika, 52
R. McCrae, O. John (1992)
An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.Journal of personality, 60 2
R. Hoyle (1997)
Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applicationsJournal of Marketing Research, 34
P. Sackett, S. Zedeck, Larry Fogli (1988)
Relations Between Measures of Typical and Maximum Job PerformanceJournal of Applied Psychology, 73
Mount Mount, Barrick Barrick (1995)
The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources managementResearch in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13
R. Bagozzi, T. Heatherton (1994)
A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteemStructural Equation Modeling, 1
S. Adler (1996)
Personality and Work Behaviour: Exploring the LinkagesApplied Psychology, 45
W. Borman, D. Brush (1993)
More Progress Toward a Taxonomy of Managerial Performance RequirementsHuman Performance, 6
T. Judge, J. Bono (2000)
Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 5
R. Hogan, G. Curphy, J. Hogan (1994)
What we know about leadership. Effectiveness and personality.The American psychologist, 49 6
The study tests the distinction between typical and maximum criteria with ratings of transformational leadership performance, and examines whether the criterion‐related validities of the five factor model differ for the two types of criteria. Using an East Asian military sample (n= 1,259) where multiple ratings of typical and maximum performance were obtained from different sources, we used structural equation modeling to test the typical/maximum performance distinction. Results found that typical and maximum performance are different latent constructs and that this distinction is present even after considering rating method factors (i.e., rater source, time). The importance of this distinction is shown by the fact that validities for the personality constructs were not equally predictive of both criteria: Openness was most predictive of maximum performance, Neuroticism was most predictive of typical performance, and Extroversion was predictive of both. By distinguishing typical from maximum performance constructs, relationships between personality and transformational leadership were found to be stronger than previous research suggested.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.