Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Lei, I. Hanski (1997)
Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxiaOikos, 78
(1999)
Editorial – systematic conservation planning for the real world
M. Araújo, Paul Williams (2000)
Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence dataBiological Conservation, 96
M. Cabeza (2003)
Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve designEcology Letters, 6
Paul Williams, Miguel Araújo (2002)
Apples, Oranges, and Probabilities: Integrating Multiple Factors into Biodiversity Conservation with ConsistencyEnvironmental Modeling & Assessment, 7
D. Saunders, Richard Hobbs, C. Margules (1991)
Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A ReviewConservation Biology, 5
R. Pressey, A. Nicholls (1989)
Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approachesBiological Conservation, 50
R. Pressey, H. Possingham, C. Margules (1996)
Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?Biological Conservation, 76
K. Cocks, I. Baird (1989)
Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: An example from the Eyre Peninsula, South AustraliaBiological Conservation, 49
D. Gutiérrez, J. León-Cortés, Rosa Menéndez, R. Wilson, M. Cowley, C. Thomas (2001)
METAPOPULATIONS OF FOUR LEPIDOPTERAN HERBIVORES ON A SINGLE HOST PLANT, LOTUS CORNICULATUSEcology, 82
M. Cowley, C. Thomas, R. Wilson, J. León-Cortés, D. Gutiérrez, C. Bulman (2001)
Density–distribution relationships in British butterflies. II. An assessment of mechanismsJournal of Animal Ecology, 70
R. Pressey, H. Possingham, J. Day (1997)
Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reservesBiological Conservation, 80
C. Margules, A. Nicholls, M. Usher (1994)
Apparent species turnover, probability of extinction and the selection of nature reserves A case study of the Ingleborough limestone pavementsConservation Biology, 8
L. Underhill (1994)
Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithmsBiological Conservation, 70
A. Moilanen, M. Cabeza (2002)
Single‐species dynamic site selectionEcological Applications, 12
(1997)
Habitat fragmentation and changes in biodiversity
M. Cowley, C. Thomas, D. Roy, R. Wilson, J. León-Cortés, D. Gutiérrez, C. Bulman, R. Quinn, D. Moss, K. Gaston (2001)
Density–distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scaleJournal of Animal Ecology, 70
(2001)
Complementarity. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity
A. Nicholls, C. Margules (1993)
An upgraded reserve selection algorithmBiological Conservation, 64
M. Morris, E. Pollard, T. Yates (1993)
Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation
Pressey Pressey (1999)
Systematic conservation planning for the real worldParks, 9
H. Leslie, M. Ruckelshaus, I. Ball, S. Andelman, H. Possingham (2003)
Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networksEcological Applications, 13
(2004)
British Ecological Society Journal of Applied Ecology
R. Wilson, S. Ellis, J. Baker, M. Lineham, R. Whitehead, C. Thomas (2002)
LARGE‐SCALE PATTERNS OF DISTRIBUTION AND PERSISTENCE AT THE RANGE MARGINS OF A BUTTERFLYEcology, 83
Henrik Andrén (1994)
Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a reviewOikos, 71
M. Araújo, Paul Williams, R. Fuller (2002)
Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reservesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269
Rosa Menéndez, D. Gutiérrez, C. Thomas (2002)
Migration and Allee effects in the six‐spot burnet moth Zygaena filipendulaeEcological Entomology, 27
R. Pressey, C. Humphries, C. Margules, R. Vane-Wright, P. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 8 4
M. Cabeza, A. Moilanen (2001)
Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity.Trends in ecology & evolution, 16 5
H. Possingham, J. Day, M. Goldfinch, F. Salzborn (1993)
The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation
C. Thomas, R. Wilson, O. Lewis (2002)
Short–term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269
K. Virolainen, Teija Virola, J. Suhonen, M. Kuitunen, Antti Lammi, P. Siikamäki (1999)
Selecting networks of nature reserves: methods do affect the long-term outcomeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266
R. Church, D. Stoms, F. Davis (1996)
Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problemBiological Conservation, 76
Henrik Andrén, Per Anglestam (1988)
Elevated Predation Rates as an Edge Effect in Habitat Islands: Experimental evidenceEcology
A. Rodrigues, K. Gaston (2002)
Optimisation in reserve selection procedures—why not?Biological Conservation, 107
Williams Williams, Araújo Araújo (2002)
Apples, oranges, and probabilities: integrating multiple factors into biodiversity conservation with consistency. Environmental modeling and assessment, special issueReserve Design Modeling, 7
R. Woodroffe, J. Ginsberg (1998)
Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areasScience, 280 5372
Paul Williams, Miguel Araéjo (2000)
Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
W. Cook, W. Cunningham, W. Pulleyblank, A. Schrijver (1997)
Combinatorial optimization
A. Rodrigues, R. Gregory, K. Gaston (2000)
Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnoverProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
R. Yahner (1988)
Changes in Wildlife Communities Near EdgesConservation Biology, 2
M. Araújo (2003)
The coincidence of people and biodiversity in EuropeGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 12
J. Camm, S. Polasky, A. Solow, B. Csuti (1996)
A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selectionBiological Conservation, 78
G. Hess (1996)
Disease in Metapopulation Models: Implications for ConservationEcology, 77
F. Adler, B. Nuernberger (1994)
Persistence in patchy irregular landscapesTheoretical Population Biology, 45
H. Possingham, I. Ball, S. Andelman (2000)
Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks
B. Csuti, S. Polasky, P. Williams, R. Pressey, J. Camm, M. Kershaw, A. Kiester, Brian Downs, Richard Hamilton, M. Huso, K. Sahr (1997)
A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in OregonBiological Conservation, 80
M. Cowley, R. Wilson, J. León-Cortés, D. Gutiérrez, C. Bulman, C. Thomas (2000)
Habitat‐based statistical models for predicting the spatial distribution of butterflies and day‐flying moths in a fragmented landscapeJournal of Applied Ecology, 37
M. Cabeza, A. Moilanen (2003)
Site‐Selection Algorithms and Habitat LossConservation Biology, 17
Summary 1 There is a great concern about the loss of biodiversity that calls for more nature protection. Unfortunately, the funding available for conservation is limited, and often a compromise is needed between nature protection and economic interests. Reserve selection algorithms are optimization techniques that concentrate on identifying a set of reserves that represents biodiversity efficiently. Simple approaches to reserve selection use presence–absence data assuming that if a species occurs in a selected reserve, it will persist there indefinitely. 2 A refinement of this technique is the selection of reserves according to the local probabilities of occurrence of the given species. These can be estimated from habitat models fitted by empirical modelling techniques. However, local probabilities of occurrence are not static, and are influenced by the changing threats to biodiversity in and around the reserves. 3 The effects of landscape change can be minimized when compact reserves are favoured. Compact reserves that represent all species with a given target probability of occurrence can be achieved by combining the probability approach with spatial reserve design. 4 In this study we brought together two reserve selection approaches that implicitly deal with biodiversity persistence, by combining habitat models and spatial reserve design in a single algorithm. We applied the combined algorithm to a data set of 26 species of butterflies from north Wales. 5 For the particular case study addressed in this paper, clustered reserve networks could be identified at no or a small increase in cost. 6 A new, backwards, heuristic algorithm performed better and more consistently than the regular forwards heuristic approach. 7 Synthesis and applications. The reserve selection approach presented considers habitat quality (via probabilities of occurrence) and the spatial configuration of the reserves during the selection process. Emphasis on reserve networks that include high‐quality sites in an aggregated manner increases the potential for long‐term persistence of species in the reserve network.
Journal of Applied Ecology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.