Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Evans, J. Seemann (1984)
Differences between Wheat Genotypes in Specific Activity of Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase and the Relationship to Photosynthesis.Plant physiology, 74 4
I. Woodrow, J. Berry (1988)
Enzymatic Regulation of Photosynthetic CO2, Fixation in C3 Plants, 39
Sharkey Sharkey (1985a)
Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C 3 plants: physics, physiology and rate limitationsBotanical Review, 51
J. Lowther (1980)
Use of a single sulphuric acid-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiata needles.Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 11
Ball Ball, Berry Berry (1992)
An analysis and concise description of Stomatal responses to multiple environmental factorsPlanta
T. Sasek, Evan DeLucia, B. Strain (1985)
Reversibility of Photosynthetic Inhibition in Cotton after Long-Term Exposure to Elevated CO(2) Concentrations.Plant physiology, 78 3
J. Ehleringer, O. Björkman (1977)
Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO2, and O2 ConcentrationPlant Physiology, 59
R. Leuning (1990)
Modelling Stomatal Behaviour and and Photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandisAustralian Journal of Plant Physiology, 17
Brooks Brooks, Farquhar Farquhar (1985)
Effect of temperature on the CO 2 /O 2 specificity of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light: estimates from gas‐exchange experiments on spinachPlanta, 165
J. Ball, I. Woodrow, J. Berry (1987)
A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions
Wong Wong (1979)
Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO 2 and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen nutrition and photosynthetic capacity in C 3 and C 4 plantsOecologia, 44
Farquhar Farquhar, Caemmerer Caemmerer, Berry Berry (1980)
A biochemical model Of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 speciesPlanta, 149
J. Reynolds, B. Acock (1985)
Predicting the response of plants to increasing carbon dioxide: A critique of plant growth modelsEcological Modelling, 29
Thomas Sharkey (1985)
O(2)-insensitive photosynthesis in c(3) plants : its occurrence and a possible explanation.Plant physiology, 78 1
Harley Harley, Weber Weber, Gates Gates (1985)
Interactive effects of light, leaf temperature, CO 2 and O 2 on photosynthesis in soybeanPlanta, 165
Evans Evans (1989)
Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C 3 plantsOecologia, 78
A. Keys (1986)
Rubisco: its role in photorespirationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 313
Field Field (1983)
Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximization of carbon gain: leaf age as a control on the allocation programOecologia, 56
Badger Badger, Collatz Collatz (1977)
Studies on the kinetic mechanism of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase and oxygenase reactions, with particular reference to the effect of temperature on kinetic parametersCarnegie Institution of Washington Yearbook, 76
Harley Harley, Tenhunen Tenhunen, Lange Lange (1986)
Use of an analytical model to study limitations on net photosynthesis in Arbutus unedo under held conditionsOecologia, 70
R. Sage, Thomas Sharkey, J. Seemann (1989)
Acclimation of Photosynthesis to Elevated CO(2) in Five C(3) Species.Plant physiology, 89 2
B. Strain, J. Cure (1985)
Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation
F. Johnson, H. Eyring, R. Williams (1942)
The nature of enzyme inhibitions in bacterial luminescence: Sulfanilamide, urethane, temperature and pressure†Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 20
P. Aphalo, P. Jarvis (1991)
Do stomata respond to relative humidityPlant Cell and Environment, 14
V. Ramanathan (1988)
The Greenhouse Theory of Climate Change: A Test by an Inadvertent Global ExperimentScience, 240
Radin Radin, Kimball Kimball, Hendrix Hendrix, Mauney Mauney (1987)
Photosynthesis of cotton plants exposed to elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the fieldPhotosynthesis Research, 12
J. Mauney, K. Fry, G. Guinn (1978)
Relationship of Photosynthetic Rate to Growth and Fruiting of Cotton, Soybean, Sorghum, and Sunflower 1Crop Science, 18
M. Aoki, K. Yabuki (1977)
Studies on the carbon dioxide enrichment for plant growth, VII. Changes in dry matter production and photosynthetic rate of cucumber during carbon dioxide enrichmentAgricultural Meteorology, 18
Caemmerer Caemmerer, Farquhar Farquhar (1981)
Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leavesPlanta, 153
J. Cure, B. Acock (1986)
Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature surveyAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 38
R. Wulff, B. Strain (1982)
Effects of CO2 enrichment on growth and photosynthesis in Desmodium paniculatumBotany, 60
Emil Smith (1937)
THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT AND CARBON DIOXIDE ON PHOTOSYNTHESISThe Journal of General Physiology, 20
Caemmerer Caemmerer, Farquhar Farquhar (1984)
Effects of partial defoliation, changes of irradiance during growth, short‐term water stress and growth at enhanced p(CO 3 ) on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris LPlanta, 160
Jordan Jordan, Ogren Ogren (1984)
The CO 2 /O 2 specificity of ribulose 1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: dependence on ribulose‐bisphosphate concentration, pH and temperaturePlanta, 161
R. Thomas, B. Strain (1991)
Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated carbon dioxide.Plant physiology, 96 2
J. Morison (1985)
Sensitivity of stomata and water use efficiency to high CO2Plant Cell and Environment, 8
ABSTRACT Cotton plants were grown in CO2‐controlled growth chambers in atmospheres of either 35 or 65 Pa CO2. A widely accepted model of C3 leaf photosynthesis was parameterized for leaves from both CO2 treatments using non‐linear least squares regression techniques, but in order to achieve reasonable fits, it was necessary to include a phosphate limitation resulting from inadequate triose phosphate utilization. Despite the accumulation of large amounts of starch (>50 g m−2) in the high CO2 plants, the photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in both treatments were similar, although the maximum rate of Rubisco activity (Vcmax), estimated from A versus Ci response curves measured at 29°C, was ∼10% lower in leaves from plants grown in high CO2. The relationship between key model parameters and total leaf N was linear, the only difference between CO2 treatments being a slight reduction in the slope of the line relating Vcmax to leaf N in plants grown at high CO2. Stomatal conductance of leaves of plants grown and measured at 65 Pa CO2 was approximately 32% lower than that of plants grown and measured at 35 Pa. Because photosynthetic capacity of leaves grown in high CO2 was only slightly less than that of leaves grown in 35 Pa CO2, net photosynthesis measured at the growth CO2, light and temperature conditions was approximately 25% greater in leaves of plants grown in high CO2, despite the reduction in leaf conductance. Greater assimilation rate was one factor allowing plants grown in high CO2 to incorporate 30% more biomass during the first 36 d of growth.
Plant Cell & Environment – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.