Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Doverspike, W. Arthur (1995)
Race and Sex Differences in Reactions to a Simulated Selection Decision Involving Race-Based Affirmative ActionJournal of Black Psychology, 21
Leo Groarke (1990)
Affirmative action as a form of restitutionJournal of Business Ethics, 9
Nacoste Nacoste (1986)
The taint of affirmative actionSocial Science, 71
Marlene Turner, A. Pratkanis (1993)
Effects of Preferential and Meritorious Selection on Performance: An Examination of Intuitive and Self-Handicapping PerspectivesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19
J. Kluegel (1985)
“If There Isn't a Problem, You Don't Need a Solution”American Behavioral Scientist, 28
J. Mcconahay (1982)
Self-Interest versus Racial Attitudes as Correlates of Anti-Busing Attitudes in Louisville: Is it The Buses or the Blacks?The Journal of Politics, 44
P. Bentler, D. Bonett (1980)
Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance StructuresPsychological Bulletin, 88
Nacoste Nacoste (1985)
Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action: The case of favorable treatmentLaw and Human Behavior, 9
G. Leventhal (1980)
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory
Stephen Kraus (1990)
Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical LiteraturePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21
H. Marsh, J. Balla, R. Mcdonald (1988)
Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : The effect of sample sizePsychological Bulletin, 103
D. Sears, R. Lau, T. Tyler, H. Allen (1980)
Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 74
C. Jacobson (1985)
Resistance to Affirmative ActionJournal of Conflict Resolution, 29
F. Tougas (1990)
The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22
F. Tougas (1989)
Male acceptance of affirmative action programs for women: the results of altruistic or egoistical motives?International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 24 1-5
P. Sniderman, P. Tetlock (1986)
Symbolic Racism: Problems of Motive Attribution in Political AnalysisJournal of Social Issues, 42
W. Arthur, D. Doverspike, Rick Fuentes (1992)
Recipients' affective responses to affirmative action interventions: A cross-cultural perspectiveBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 10
Rupert Nacoste (1994)
If Empowerment Is the Goal...: Affirmative Action and social InteractionBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 15
P. Sniderman, P. Tetlock (1986)
Reflections on American RacismJournal of Social Issues, 42
J. Dovidio, Jeffrey Mann, S. Gaertner (1989)
Resistance to Affirmative Action: The Implications of Aversive Racism
Rupert Nacoste (1990)
Sources of Stigma: Analyzing the Psychology of Affirmative ActionLaw & Policy, 12
Kluegel Kluegel (1985)
If there isn't a problem, you don't need a solution”: The bases of contemporary affirmative action attitudesAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 28
David Kravitz, J. Platania (1993)
Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicityJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
Lipset Lipset, Schneider Schneider (1978)
The Bakke case: How would it be decided at the bar of public opinionPublic Opinion, 1
F. Tougas, Ann Beaton (1991)
Why Women Approve of Affirmative Action: The Study of a Predictive ModelInternational Journal of Psychology, 26
F. Tougas (1988)
The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 20
R. Johnson (1990)
Affirmative Action Policy in the United States: its impact on womenPolicy and Politics, 18
F. Tougas, Ann Beaton (1993)
Affirmative action in the work place: for better or for worseApplied Psychology, 42
Rupert Nacoste (1985)
Selection procedure and responses to affirmative actionLaw and Human Behavior, 9
M. Singer (1992)
The application of relative deprivation theory to justice perception of preferential selectionCurrent Psychology, 11
J. Kluegel, Eliot Smith (1983)
Affirmative Action Attitudes: Effects of Self-Interest, Racial Affect, and Stratification Beliefs on Whites' ViewsSocial Forces, 61
D. Kinder, D. Sears (1981)
Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good LifeJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40
McConahay McConahay, Hough Hough (1976)
Symbolic racismJournal of Social Issues, 32
Rupert Nacoste (1987)
But Do They Care About Fairness? The Dynamics of Preferential Treatment and Minority InterestBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 8
A. Murrell, B. Dietz-Uhler, J. Dovidio, S. Gaertner, Cheryl Drout (1994)
Aversive Racism and Resistance to Affirmative Action: Perception of Justice Are Not Necessarily Color BlindBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 15
S. Vries, T. Pettigrew (1994)
A comparative Perspective on Affirmative Action: Positieve Aktie in The NetherlandsBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 15
M. Raymond, D. Roberts (1987)
A Comparison of Methods for Treating Incomplete Data in Selection ResearchEducational and Psychological Measurement, 47
Jacobson Jacobson (1985)
Resistance to affirmative action: Self‐interest or racismJournal of Conflict Resolution, 29
D. Kinder (1986)
The Continuing American Dilemma: White Resistance to Racial Change 40 Years After MyrdalJournal of Social Issues, 42
T. Tyler, K. Mcgraw (1986)
Ideology and the Interpretation of Personal Experience: Procedural Justice and Political QuiescenceJournal of Social Issues, 42
Lynch Lynch, Beer Beer (1990, Winter)
You ain't the right color, palPolicy Review, 51
Non‐Black students (N= 178) completed a questionnaire that permitted tests of hypotheses about the bases of attitudes toward affirmative action plans (AAPs) directed at Blacks. Respondents positively evaluated 5 AAPs (race blind, eliminate discrimination, recruitment, training, proportional hiring) and rejected 2 AAPs (weak and strong preferential treatment). Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that attitudes toward the specific AAPs were entirely mediated by judgments of AAP fairness, but were only partly mediated by perceived threats to personal and collective self‐interest. Attitudes toward the specific AAPs were more strongly related to details of the AAPs than to individual differences or to attitudes toward affirmative action in general. Attitudes toward affirmative action in general varied with self‐interest and racism, but not with belief in the dominant ideology of opportunity.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.