Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Carpenter (1952)
Comparative Ecology of the Common Garter Snake (Thamnophis s. sirtalis), the Ribbon Snake (Thamnophis s. sauritus), and Butler's Garter Snake (Thamnophis butleri) in Mixed PopulationsEcological Monographs, 22
L. Goodman, W. Kruskal (1959)
Measures of Association for Cross Classifications. II: Further Discussion and ReferencesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 54
P. Gregory (1978)
Feeding habits and diet overlap of three species of garter snakes (Thamnophis) on Vancouver IslandCanadian Journal of Zoology, 569
E. Pianka (1970)
Comparative Autecology of the Lizard Cnemidophorus Tigris in Different Parts of Its Georgraphic RangeEcology, 51
J. Major (1980)
Sierra Nevada Natural HistoryEcology, 61
W. Parker, E. Pianka (1975)
Comparative Ecology of Populations of the Lizard Uta stansburianaCopeia, 1975
(1980)
Aquatic foraging in some new world Natricine snakes : generalists and specialists and their behavioral evolution . PhD dissertation , University of Tennessee , Knoxville
S. Wright (1977)
Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions
E. Fleharty (1967)
COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS, T. CYRTOPSIS, AND T. RUFIPUNCTATUS IN NEW MEXICOSouthwestern Naturalist, 12
N. Stamp, R. Ohmart (1978)
Resource Utilization by Desert Rodents in the Lower Sonoran DesertEcology, 59
H. Fitch (1941)
A Biogeographical study of the ordinoides artenkreis of garter snakes, genus Thamnophis, by Henry S. Fitch.
(1980)
The microvolution of feeding behavior, p. 409-453
J. Connell (1980)
Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition pastOikos, 35
P. Ehrlich, R. White, M. Singer, S. McKechnie, L. Gilbert (1975)
Checkerspot butterflies: a historical perspective.Science, 188 4185
W. Hamilton (1951)
The Food and Feeding Behavior of the Garter Snake in New York StateAmerican Midland Naturalist, 46
L. Goodman, W. Kruskal (1979)
Measures of association for cross classifications
(1960)
Criteria for determining sex and breeding maturity in snakes
S. Arnold (1977)
Polymorphism and Geographic Variation in the Feeding Behavior of the Garter Snake Thamnophis elegansScience, 197
S. Arnold (1981)
BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. I. PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CHEMORECEPTIVE RESPONSES TO PREY IN THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANSEvolution, 35
S. Arnold, R. Wassersug (1978)
Differential Predation on Metamorphic Anurans by Garter Snakes (Thamnophis): Social Behavior as a Possible DefenseEcology, 59
H. Fitch (1965)
An ecological study of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis
M. White, J. Kolb (1974)
A Preliminary Study of Thamnophis near Sagehen Creek, CaliforniaCopeia, 1974
K. Lagler, J. Salyer (1945)
Influence of Availability on the Feeding Habits of the Common Garter SnakeCopeia, 1945
S. Arnold (1981)
BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. II. THE INHERITANCE OF A FEEDING RESPONSE IN CROSSES BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC RACES OF THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANSEvolution, 35
L. Fox, P. Morrow (1981)
Specialization: species property or local phenomenon?Science, 211 4485
P. Gregory, K. Stewart (1975)
Long-distance dispersal and feeding strategy of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) in the Interlake of ManitobaCanadian Journal of Zoology, 53
Diets of the terrestrial garter snake ( Thamnophis elegans ) and the common garter snake ( T. sirtalis ) were studied at 22 sites in an area of about 250 km 2 in northern California, during the summers of 1978–80. Overall, T. sirtalis consumed mostly amphibian and T. elegans ate an equal mixture of amphibians, fish, and leeches. However, this was more an effect of differential distribution of the two species among sites than of habitat partitioning within sites. Site was 5 times better as a predictor of diet than was species of snake. The relative frequency of T. sirtalis at the sites was correlated with the number of amphibian species.
Oecologia – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.