Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: how cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes & L. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, volume 1: Facial Attractiveness (pp. 59–90). Westport, CT: Ablex.)
Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: how cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes & L. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, volume 1: Facial Attractiveness (pp. 59–90). Westport, CT: Ablex.Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: how cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes & L. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, volume 1: Facial Attractiveness (pp. 59–90). Westport, CT: Ablex., Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: how cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes & L. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, volume 1: Facial Attractiveness (pp. 59–90). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Klaus Rifbjerg, A. Taylor (2011)
Sex RolesMinnesota Review, 20
(1997)
Sex, science and sensationalism
(Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.)
Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press., Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
M. Birnbaum (1999)
Testing Critical Properties of Decision Making on the InternetPsychological Science, 10
I. Penton-Voak, D. Perrett, D. Castles, D. Castles, Tsuneo Kobayashi, D. Burt, L. Murray, R. Minamisawa (1999)
Menstrual cycle alters face preferenceNature, 399
I. Reiss (1968)
The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness
L. Caporael (2001)
Evolutionary psychology: toward a unifying theory and a hybrid science.Annual review of psychology, 52
D Singh (1993)
Body shape and female attractiveness: the critical role of waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)Human Nature, 4
J. Swaddle, Gillian Reierson (2002)
Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human malesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269
W. Wood, A. Eagly (2002)
A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences.Psychological bulletin, 128 5
C. Harris (2003)
A Review of Sex Differences in Sexual Jealousy, Including Self-Report Data, Psychophysiological Responses, Interpersonal Violence, and Morbid JealousyPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 7
L. Miller, S. Fishkin (1997)
On the dynamics of human bonding and reproductive success: Seeking windows on the adapted-for human–environmental interface.
Devendrá Singh (1993)
Body shape and women’s attractivenessHuman Nature, 4
N. Neave, Sarah Laing, B. Fink, J. Manning (2003)
Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominanceProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270
(Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the studyresponse project. (Tech. Rep. No. 13001). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies.)
Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the studyresponse project. (Tech. Rep. No. 13001). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies.Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the studyresponse project. (Tech. Rep. No. 13001). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies., Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the studyresponse project. (Tech. Rep. No. 13001). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies.
C. Macrae, K. Alnwick, A. Milne, Astrid Schloerscheidt (2002)
Person Perception Across the Menstrual Cycle: Hormonal Influences on Social-Cognitive FunctioningPsychological Science, 13
A. Eagly, W. Wood (1987)
The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles
J. Krantz, R. Dalal (2000)
Validity of Web-Based Psychological Research
D. Berry, L. McArthur (1985)
Some components and consequences of a babyface.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48
J. Musch, A. Bröder, K. Klauer (2001)
Improving survey research on the World-Wide Web using the randomized response technique
J. Alcock (1975)
Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach
Donald Symons (1989)
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 12
A. Thompson (1984)
Emotional and Sexual Components of Extramarital Relations.Journal of Marriage and Family, 46
J Tooby, L Cosmides (2005)
The handbook of evolutionary psychology
S. Gosling, S. Vazire, S. Srivastava, O. John (2004)
Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.The American psychologist, 59 2
S. Braude, Z. Tang-Martínez, G. Taylor (1999)
Stress,testosterone, and the immunoredistribution hypothesisBehavioral Ecology, 10
G. Spanier, Randie Margolis (1983)
Marital separation and extramarital sexual behaviorJournal of Sex Research, 19
D. Fessler, C. Navarrete (2003)
Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycleEvolution and Human Behavior, 24
M. Cunningham, A. Barbee, Carolyn Pike (1990)
What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.Journal of personality and social psychology, 59 1
L. Miller, Anila Putcha-Bhagavatula, William Pedersen (2002)
Men's and Women's Mating Preferences: Distinct Evolutionary Mechanisms?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11
C. Keating (1985)
Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness.Social Psychology Quarterly, 48
I. Folstad, A. Karter (1992)
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence HandicapThe American Naturalist, 139
R. Thornhill, S. Gangestad (1996)
The evolution of human sexuality.Trends in ecology & evolution, 11 2
C. Harris, N. Christenfeld (1996)
Gender, Jealousy, and ReasonPsychological Science, 7
John Alcock (2005)
Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach, 8th ed.
J. Harris, P. Vernon, D. Boomsma (1998)
The Heritability of Testosterone: A Study of Dutch Adolescent Twins and Their ParentsBehavior Genetics, 28
S. Locke, B. Gilbert (1995)
Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
M Daly, M Wilson (1988)
Homicide
S. Glass, T. Wright (1985)
Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfactionSex Roles, 12
S. Klein, R. Nelson (1998)
Adaptive Immune Responses Are Linked to the Mating System of Arvicoline RodentsThe American Naturalist, 151
(Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the internet. Psychological Science, 10(5), 399–407.)
Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the internet. Psychological Science, 10(5), 399–407.Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the internet. Psychological Science, 10(5), 399–407., Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the internet. Psychological Science, 10(5), 399–407.
(Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.)
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104., Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.
A. Wilcox, D. Dunson, D. Baird (2000)
The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective studyBMJ : British Medical Journal, 321
(McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502–506.)
McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502–506.McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502–506., McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502–506.
(Musch, J., Broder, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Improving survey research on the world-wide web using the randomized response technique. In U-D. Reips and M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 179–192). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.)
Musch, J., Broder, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Improving survey research on the world-wide web using the randomized response technique. In U-D. Reips and M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 179–192). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Musch, J., Broder, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Improving survey research on the world-wide web using the randomized response technique. In U-D. Reips and M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 179–192). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers., Musch, J., Broder, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Improving survey research on the world-wide web using the randomized response technique. In U-D. Reips and M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 179–192). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
A. Zahavi (1975)
Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.Journal of theoretical biology, 53 1
D. Kenrick, J. Maner, Norman Li (2010)
Evolutionary Social Psychology
(Locke, S. D., & Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 255–263.)
Locke, S. D., & Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 255–263.Locke, S. D., & Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 255–263., Locke, S. D., & Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 255–263.
A. Little, I. Penton-Voak, D. Burt, D. Perrett (2002)
Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces.
(1969)
The affair. New York: World
K. McGraw, M. Tew, John Williams (2000)
The Integrity of Web-Delivered Experiments: Can You Trust the Data?Psychological Science, 11
A. Ros, T. Groothuis, V. Apanius (1997)
The Relation Among Gonadal Steroids, Immunocompetence, Body Mass, And Behavior in Young Black‐Headed Gulls (Larus Ridibundus)The American Naturalist, 150
A. Bröder, Natalia Hohmann (2003)
Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle An improved replicationEvolution and Human Behavior, 24
D. Perrett, Kieran Lee, Kieran Lee, I. Penton-Voak, D. Rowland, S. Yoshikawa, D. Burt, S. Henzi, D. Castles, S. Akamatsu (1998)
Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractivenessNature, 394
M. Bellis, R. Baker (1990)
Do females promote sperm competition? Data for humansAnimal Behaviour, 40
(2002)
Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the studyresponse project
Harry Moore, M. Martín, Tim Birkhead (1999)
No evidence for killer sperm or other selective interactions between human spermatozoa in ejaculates of different males in vitroProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266
HD Moore, M Martin, TR Birkhead (1999)
No evidence for killer sperm or other selective interactions between ejaculates of different males in vitroProceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Science, 266
G. Rhodes, Janelle Chan, Leslie Zebrowitz, L. Simmons (2003)
Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270
(2005)
Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychologyThe handbook of evolutionary psychology
M Hunt (1969)
The affair
A. Little, P. Hancock (2002)
The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness.British journal of psychology, 93 Pt 4
I. Penton-Voak, D. Perrett (2000)
Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidenceEvolution and Human Behavior, 21
T. Birkhead (1997)
Human sperm competition: By R.R. Baker and M. Bellis Chapman & Hall, 1995 £47.00 hbk (376 pages) ISBN 0 412 45430 0Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12
(2005)
Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology The handbook of evolutionary psychology
Two previous articles reported that women prefer less feminized male faces during the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle, supposedly reflecting an evolved mating strategy whereby women choose mates of maximum genetic quality when conception is likely. The current article contends this theory rests on several questionable assumptions about human ancestral mating systems. A new empirical test also was conducted: 853 adults, primarily from North America, evaluated facial attractiveness of photos. The study included more complete evaluation of ovulatory status and a greater number (n = 258) of target women than past research. The results did not suggest any greater preference for masculine faces when fertilization was likely. The article concludes with general comments about evolutionary theorizing and interpersonal relationships.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 11, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.