Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Upton (1995)
What Really Makes Factories Flexible
R. Jaikumar (1986)
Postindustrial manufacturingHarvard Business Review, 64
D. Upton (1995)
Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturingJournal of Operations Management, 12
F. Blackler, Colin Brown (1986)
Alternative models to guide the design and introduction of the new information technologies into work organizationsJournal of occupational psychology, 59
Upton Upton, Sussman Sussman (1985)
From Control to Commitment in the WorkplaceHarvard Business Review
B. Burnes (1988)
New technology and job design: the case of CNCNew Technology Work and Employment, 3
Robert Price, Siegfried Steininger (1987)
Trade unions and new technology in West GermanyNew Technology Work and Employment, 2
D. Upton (1994)
The Management of Manufacturing FlexibilityCalifornia Management Review, 36
This paper empirically investigates the effect of advanced manufacturing technology on process stability during flexible production in a process industry. A sample of 61 North American fine paper plants is used to examine the relationship between the level of automation installed for controlling changes between paper grades and the incidence of paper web breaks. These web breaks are catastrophic failures; they require the entire plant to be stopped, reinitialized, and restarted. Because a large fraction of breaks occurs shortly after changeovers, they are an important determinant of the aspect of plant flexibility, called mobility, or the ability to move between products with only small penalties. In an attempt to ensure stable and mobile production, many plants have implemented changeover automation. We find, however, that higher levels of this automation are significantly associated with higher rates of catastrophic failure among the plants studied. We suggest that this finding becomes less paradoxical when considered in light of a recent stream of research on advanced manufacturing technologies, loosely called the usability perspective. According to this perspective, automation designed and implemented with the narrow, technical goal of replacing human operators or removing their discretion over a production process is misguided, especially in environments in which requirements are changing rapidly.
Production and Operations Management – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.