Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Sroufe, E. Waters (1977)
Attachment as an Organizational ConstructChild Development, 48
R. Sokal, F. Rohlf, Freeman, Co. (1969)
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
G. Ruppenthal, M. Harlow, C. Eisele, H. Harlow, S. Suomi (1974)
Development of peer interactions of monkeys reared in a nuclear-family environment.Child development, 45 3
R. Hinde, Y. Spencer-Booth (1967)
The behaviour of socially living rhesus monkeys in their first two and a half years.Animal behaviour, 15 1
Donna Anderson, M. Simpson (1979)
Breeding Performance of a Captive Colony of Rhesus Macaques (Macaca Mulatto)Laboratory Animals, 13
R. Hinde, S. Atkinson (1970)
Assessing the roles of social partners in maintaining mutual proximity, as exemplified by mother-infant relations in rhesus monkeysAnimal Behaviour, 18
R. Mccall (1977)
Transitions in Early Mental Development.Monographs of The Society for Research in Child Development, 42
B. Morgan, M. Simpson, J. Hanby, Joan Hall-Craggs (1976)
VISUALIZING INTERACTION AND SEQUENTIAL DATA IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR: THEORY AND APPLICATION OF CLUSTER-ANALYSIS METHODSBehaviour, 56
L. White, R. Hinde (1975)
Some factors affecting mother-infant relations in rhesus monkeysAnimal Behaviour, 23
THE INTERPRETATION OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN RHESUS MONKEY INFANTS by M. J. A. SIMPSON and S. HOWE 1) (MRC Unit on the Development and Integration of Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, United Kingdom) (With 2 Figures) (Acc. 6-VI-1979) INTRODUCTION In studying the social development of rhesus monkey infants, a very large number of different measures of the relationships the infants have with their mothers (e.g. HmDE & HERRMANN, 1977) and others (e.g. WHITE & HINDE, 1975) could be used. This paper is concerned with the extent to which such measures, for 8 week-old infants, can be classed into groups, with members of each group being correlated relatively highly with each other, but less highly with those of other groups. Such grouping could be a powerful method of data reduction. For example, if a number of measures reflecting maternal protectiveness varied together, and if every member of this group were inversely correlated with the members of another group, representing maternal rejection, then we could regard what we originally believed to be two groups as one, and we would only need to use one measure to represent all of them. If, however, we found that how protective a rhesus monkey
Behaviour – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1980
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.