Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Linsley, M. Kohler, J. Paulhus (1958)
Hydrology for engineers
N. Poff, J. Ward (1990)
Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneityEnvironmental Management, 14
(1991)
Ecological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out - of - channel flow re · quirements
K. Walker, M. Thoms, F. Sheldon, P. Boon, P. Calow, G. Petts (1992)
Effects of weirs on the littoral environment of the River Murray, South Australia
M. Bain, J. Finn, H. Booke (1988)
Streamflow regulation and fish community structureEcology, 69
J. Hughes, B. James (1989)
A hydrological regionalization of streams in Victoria, Australia, with implications for stream EcologyMarine and Freshwater Research, 40
O. Gorman, J. Karr (1978)
Habitat Structure and Stream Fish CommunitiesEcology, 59
B. Maheshwari, K. Walker, T. McMahon (1995)
Effects of regulation on the flow regime of the river Murray, AustraliaRegulated Rivers-research & Management, 10
B. Southwood (1977)
HABITAT, THE TEMPLET FOR ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES?Journal of Animal Ecology, 46
T. Kozlowski (1985)
Flooding and Plant GrowthAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 18
J. Searcy (1960)
Graphical Correlation Of Gaging-Station Records
W. Junk (1989)
The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems, 106
Dudley Reiser, T. Wesche, C. Estes (1989)
Status of Instream Flow Legislation and Practices in North AmericaFisheries, 14
(1993)
Altered hydrologic regimes and implications for bottomland hardwoods along the Roanoke River
A. Bishop, T. Hardy (1990)
Analyzing Instream Flow Tradeoffs for Small Hydropower Development, 1
G. McBride, J. Loftis, Nadine Adkins (1993)
What do significance tests really tell us about the environment?Environmental Management, 18
L. Leopold (1994)
The View from the River:
(1994)
Stream Ecology: Structure and function of running waters
G. Suter (1993)
A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexesEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12
T. Southwood (1988)
Tactics, strategies and templets*Oikos, 52
A. Stewart‐Oaten, J. Bence, C. Osenberg (1992)
Assessing Effects of Unreplicated Perturbations: No Simple SolutionsEcology, 73
P. Keddy (1992)
Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecologyJournal of Vegetation Science, 3
M. Paller, S. Modica, E. Hofstetter (1992)
Short-term changes in a southeastern coastal plain fish assemblage following artificial increases in streamflow, 3
M. Dynesius, C. Nilsson (1994)
Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the WorldScience, 266
W. Alley, A. Burns (1983)
Mixed-station extension of monthly streamflow records.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109
N. Poff, J. Ward (1989)
Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow PatternsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46
(1990)
Standards for instream flows
L. Toth, J. Obeysekera, W. Perkins, M. Loftin (1993)
Flow regulation and restoration of Florida's Kissimmee riverRegulated Rivers-research & Management, 8
J. Stanford, J. Ward (1979)
Stream Regulation in North America
J. Karr (1993)
Defining and assessing ecological integrity: Beyond water qualityEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12
B. Doppelt (1993)
Entering the watershed : a new approach to save America's river ecosystems
J. Kusler, Mary Kentula (1990)
Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science.
S. Gaines, Mark Denny (1993)
The largest, smallest, highest, lowest, longest, and shortest: extremes in ecologyEcology, 74
S. Rood, J. Mahoney (1990)
Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: Probable causes and prospects for mitigationEnvironmental Management, 14
S. Carpenter, T. Frost, D. Heisey, T. Kratz (1989)
Randomized Intervention Analysis and the Interpretation of Whole‐Ecosystem ExperimentsEcology, 70
(1974)
group includes 12 parameters, each of which measures the central tendency (mean) of the daily water conditions for a given month
D. Blockstein, R. Noss, A. Cooperrider (1994)
Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting and Restoring BiodiversityBioScience
L. Hesse, G. Mestl (1993)
An Alternative Hydrograph for the Missouri River Based on the Precontrol ConditionNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 13
O. Davies, G. Snedecor, W. Cochran (1968)
Statistical Methods. 6th Edition.Applied statistics, 17
S. Carpenter (1989)
Replication and Treatment Strength in Whole‐Lake ExperimentsEcology, 70
O. Moog (1993)
Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impactsRegulated Rivers-research & Management, 8
A. Stewart‐Oaten, W. Murdoch, K. Parker (1986)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: "PSEUDOREPLICATION" IN TIME?'Ecology, 67
C. Townsend, A. Hildrew (1994)
Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systemsFreshwater Biology, 31
Robert Colwell (1974)
PREDICTABILITY, CONSTANCY, AND CONTINGENCY OF PERIODIC PHENOMENA'Ecology, 55
P. Armitage (1984)
Environmental changes induced by stream regulation and their effect on lotic macroinvertebrate communitiesRegulated Rivers-research & Management
S. Hurlbert (1984)
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field ExperimentsEcological Monographs, 54
Hydrologic regimes play a major role in determining the biotic composition, structure, and function of aquatic, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. But human land and water uses are substantially altering hydrologic regimes around the world. Improved quantitative evaluations of human‐induced hydrologic changes are needed to advance research on the biotic implications of hydrologic alteration and to support ecosystem management and restoration plans. We propose a method for assessing the degree of hydrologic alteration attributable to human influence within an ecosystem. This method, referred to as the “Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration,” is based upon an analysis of hydrologic data available either from existing measurement points within an ecosystem (such as at stream gauges or wells) or model‐generated data. We use 32 parameters, organized into five groups, to statistically characterize hydrologic variation within each year. These 32 parameters provide information on ecologically significant features of surface and ground water regimes influencing aquatic, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. We then assess the hydrologic perturbations associated with activities such as dam operations, flow diversion, groundwater pumping, or intensive land‐use conversion by comparing measures of central tendency and dispersion for each parameter between user‐defined “pre‐impact” and “post‐impact” time frames, generating 64 Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration. This method is intended for use with other ecosystem metrics in inventories of ecosystem integrity, in planning ecosystem management activities, and in setting and measuring progress toward conservation or restoration goals.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.