Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Ghiselli (1973)
THE VALIDITY OF APTITUDE TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTIONPersonnel Psychology, 26
E. Tupes, R. Christal (1992)
Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings.Journal of personality, 60 2
R. McCrae, P. Costa (1987)
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.Journal of personality and social psychology, 52 1
I. Bernstein, C. Garbin, Pamela McClellan (1983)
A Confirmatory Factoring of the California Psychological InventoryEducational and Psychological Measurement, 43
(1981)
Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons
J. Johnson, J. Butcher, C. Null, K. Johnson (1984)
Replicated item level factor analysis of the full MMPI.Journal of personality and social psychology, 47 1
W. Norman (1963)
Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 66
E. Whitener (1990)
Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
B. Nathan, R. Alexander (1988)
A COMPARISON OF CRITERIA FOR TEST VALIDATION: A META‐ANALYTIC INVESTIGATIONPersonnel Psychology, 41
Hogan Hogan, Hogan Hogan (1989)
How to measure reliabilityJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
Livneh Livneh, Livneh Livneh (1989)
The five‐factor model of personality: Is evidence for its cross‐media prematurePersonality and Individual Differences, 10
Ryman Ryman, Biersner Biersner (1975)
Attitudes predictive of training successpersonnel psychology, 28
H. Gough (1985)
A Work Orientation scale for the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
H. Kay (1964)
HUMAN LEARNING.British medical bulletin, 20
(1949)
The Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply
P. Costa, R. McCrae (1988)
From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55
R. Cattell (1948)
THE PRIMARY PERSONALITY FACTORS IN WOMEN COMPARED WITH THOSE IN MENBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1
J. Hunter, F. Schmidt, M. Judiesch (1990)
Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
(1979)
The prediction of occupational choice from childhood and adolescent antecedents
F. Campos (1966)
Validity of personality measures in personnel selection
R. McCrae, P. Costa (1985)
Updating Norman's "Adequate Taxonomy": intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires.Journal of personality and social psychology, 49 3
Jeffrey Mchenry, L. Hough, J. Toquam, M. Hanson, Steven Ashworth (1990)
PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINSPersonnel Psychology, 43
R. McCrae, P. Costa (1989)
The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model.Journal of personality and social psychology, 56 4
Gene Smith (1967)
Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational ResearchEducational and Psychological Measurement, 27
Michael Botwin, David Buss (1989)
Structure of act-report data: is the five-factor model of personality recaptured?Journal of personality and social psychology, 56 6
J. Hogan, R. Hogan (1989)
How to measure employee reliability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
R. Hogan (1983)
A socioanalytic theory of personality.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
H. Lei, H. Skinner (1982)
What Difference Does Language Make? Structural Analysis Of The Personality Research FormMultivariate Behavioral Research, 17
S. Krug, Edgar Johns (1986)
A Large Scale Cross-Validation of Second-Order Personality Structure Defined by the 16PFPsychological Reports, 59
(1957)
Personality traits related to effectiveness of junior and senior Air Force officers (USAF Personnel Training Research, No. 57-125)
J. Digman, J. Inouye (1986)
Further specification of the five robust factors of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50
(1986)
Tmining in Organizations: Nee& Assessment, Development, and Evaluation
M. Bond, H. Nakazato, Daisuke Shiraishi (1975)
Universality and Distinctiveness in Dimensions of Japanese Person PerceptionJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6
W. Mcdougall (1932)
OF THE WORDS CHARACTER AND PERSONALITYJournal of Personality, 1
W. McDougall
THE PRINCIPLE UNDERLYING FECHNER'S ‘PARADOXICAL EXPERIMENT’ AND THE PREDOMINANCE OF CONTOURS IN THE STRUGGLE OF THE TWO VISUAL FIELDSBritish Journal of Psychology, 1
Patricia Sanders, John Yanouzas (1983)
Socialization to Learning.Training and development journal, 37
(1983)
Personalitycurrent theory& research: Nebraska symposium on motivation
P. Noller, H. Law, A. Comrey (1987)
Cattell, Comrey, and Eysenck personality factors compared: More evidence for the five robust factors?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53
D. Buss, N. Cantor (1990)
Book Review: Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging DirectionsSouth African Journal of Psychology, 20
N. Schmitt, R. Gooding, R. Noe, Michael Kirsch (1984)
METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICSPersonnel Psychology, 37
Hunter Hunter, Schmidt Schmidt, Judiesch Judiesch (1990)
Individual differences in output as a function of job complexityJournal of Applied Psychology, 75
R. Cattell (1943)
The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38
D. Peabody, L. Goldberg (1989)
Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors.Journal of personality and social psychology, 57 3
(1990)
Methodr of meta-analysis: correcting emor and bias in research findings
J. Digman (1989)
Five robust trait dimensions: development, stability, and utility.Journal of personality, 57 2
J. Digman, N. Takemoto-Chock (1981)
Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies.Multivariate behavioral research, 16 2
J. Digman (1990)
PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODELAnnual Review of Psychology, 41
J. Conley (1985)
Longitudinal stability of personality traits: a multitrait-multimethod-multioccasion analysis.Journal of personality and social psychology, 49 5
R. Reilly, Georgia Chao (1982)
VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURESPersonnel Psychology, 35
(1986)
Manual for the Hogan Personality inventory
M. Hakel (1974)
NORMATIVE PERSONALITY FACTORS RECOVERED FROM RATINGS OF PERSONALITY DESCRIPTORS: THE BEHOLDER'S EYEPersonnel Psychology, 27
R. Cattell (1947)
The Description and Measurement of PersonalityMental Health, 7
O. John (1989)
Towards a Taxonomy of Personality Descriptors
E. Locke, C. Hulin (1962)
A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY STUDIES OF ACTIVITY VECTOR ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 15
R. McCrae (1989)
Why I Advocate the Five-Factor Model: Joint Factor Analyses of the NEO-PI with Other Instruments
D. Watson (1989)
Strangers' Ratings of the Five Robust Personality Factors: Evidence of a Surprising Convergence With Self-ReportJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57
H. Livneh, C. Livneh (1989)
The five-factor model of personality: Is evidence of its cross-measure validity premature?Personality and Individual Differences, 10
N. Waller, Y. Ben-Porath (1987)
Is it time for clinical psychology to embrace the five-factor model of personality?American Psychologist, 42
D. Ryman, R. Biersner (1975)
Attitudes Predictive of Diving Training Success.Personnel Psychology, 28
M. Lorr, R. Youniss (1973)
An inventory of interpersonal style.Journal of personality assessment, 37 2
S. Briggs (1989)
The Optimal Level of Measurement for Personality Constructs
Wiggins Wiggins, Blackburn Blackburn, Hackman Hackman (1969)
The prediction of first‐year success in psychology: Peer ratingsJournal of Educational Research, 63
Robert Heneman (1986)
The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 39
E. Borgatta (1964)
THE STRUCTURE OF PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS.Behavioral science, 61
M. Lorr, T. Manning (1978)
Higher-Order Personality Factors Of The ISI.Multivariate behavioral research, 13 1
E. Howarth (1976)
WERE CATTELL'S ‘PERSONALITY SPHERE’ FACTORS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED IN THE FIRST INSTANCE?British Journal of Psychology, 67
N. Wiggins, Margaret Blackburn, J. Hackman (1969)
Prediction of First-Year Graduate Success in Psychology: Peer RatingsJournal of Educational Research, 63
D. Fiske (1949)
Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources.Journal of abnormal psychology, 44 3
(1988)
Literature review: Utility of temperament, biodata, and interest assessment forpredicting jobperformance
R. Hogan (1991)
Personality and personality measurement.
R. Cattell (1947)
Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factorsPsychometrika, 12
W. Norman, L. Goldberg (1966)
Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4
This study investigated the relation of the “Big Five” personality dimensions (Extraversion, Emotional Stability, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience) to three job performance criteria (job proficiency, training proficiency, and personnel data) for five occupational groups (professionals, police, managers, sales, and skilled/semi‐skilled). Results indicated that one dimension of personality, Conscientiousness, showed consistent relations with all job performance criteria for all occupational groups. For the remaining personality dimensions, the estimated true score correlations varied by occupational group and criterion type. Extraversion was a valid predictor for two occupations involving social interaction, managers and sales (across criterion types). Also, both Openness to Experience and Extraversion were valid predictors of the training proficiency criterion (across occupations). Other personality dimensions were also found to be valid predictors for some occupations and some criterion types, but the magnitude of the estimated true score correlations was small (ρ < .10). Overall, the results illustrate the benefits of using the 5‐factor model of personality to accumulate and communicate empirical findings. The findings have numerous implications for research and practice in personnel psychology, especially in the subfields of personnel selection, training and development, and performance appraisal.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.