Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Rose, Catherine Wolfram (2002)
Regulating Executive Pay: Using the Tax Code to Influence Chief Executive Officer CompensationJournal of Labor Economics, 20
N. Rose, Catherine Wolfram (2000)
Regulating Executive Pay: Using the Tax Code to Influence CEO CompensationEmployee Benefits
Sam Allgood, K. Farrell (2000)
THE EFFECT OF CEO TENURE ON THE RELATION BETWEEN FIRM PERFORMANCE AND TURNOVERJournal of Financial Research, 23
Kee Chung, Stephen Pruitt (1996)
Executive Ownership, Corporate Value, and Executive Compensation: A Unifying FrameworkSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Jennifer Gaver, K. Gaver (1995)
Compensation Policy and the Investment Opportunity SetFinancial Management, 24
M. Huson, Paul Malatesta, R. Parrino (2004)
Managerial Succession and Firm PerformanceJournal of Financial Economics, 74
Clifford Smith, R. Watts (1992)
The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation PoliciesJournal of Financial Economics, 32
N. L. Rose, C. Wolfram (2002)
Regulating executive pay: Using the tax code to influence CEO compensationJournal of Labor Economics, 20
Kevin Murphy, M. Jensen (1990)
Performance Pay and Top Management IncentivesLabor: Personnel Economics
John Barron, G. Waddell (1990)
Executive compensation.Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards, 43 10
Jennifer Gaver, K. Gaver (1993)
Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporateJournal of Accounting and Economics, 16
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Weisbach (1998)
Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEOThe American Economic Review, 88
John Bizjak, James Brickley, J. Coles (1993)
Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behaviorJournal of Accounting and Economics, 16
S. W. Barnhart, S. Rosenstein (1998)
Board composition, managerial ownership, and firm performance: An empirical analysisThe Financial Review, 33
Kevin Murphy (1999)
Chapter 38 Executive compensationHandbook of Labor Economics, 3
J. E. Core, D. F. Larcker (2002)
Performance consequences of mandatory increases in executive stock ownershipJournal of Financial Economics, 64
B. Hall, J. Liebman (1998)
Are CEOS really paid like bureaucrats?Quarterly Journal of Economics., 113
(2007)
Fa r r e l l i n Re v
K. Murphy (1999)
Handbook of labor economics
R. Defusco, Thomas Zorn, Robert Johnson (1991)
The Association Between Executive Stock Option Plan Changes and Managerial Decision MakingFinancial Management, 20
Kevin Murphy, J. Zimmerman (1993)
Financial performance surrounding CEO turnoverJournal of Accounting and Economics, 16
M. Collins, David Blackwell, J. Sinkey (1995)
The Relationship Between Corporate Compensation Policies and Investment Opportunities: Empirical Evidence for Large Bank Holding CompaniesFinancial Management, 24
K. Murphy (1995)
Politics, economics, and executive compensationUniversity of Cincinnati Law Review, 63
Wilbur Lewellen, Claudio Loderer, Kenneth Martin (1987)
Executive compensation and executive incentive problems: an empirical analysisJournal of Accounting and Economics, 9
E. Fama, K. French (1986)
Common Factors in the Serial Correlation of Stock ReturnsThe Finance
Jerold Warner, R. Watts, Karen Wruck (1988)
Stock prices and top management changesJournal of Financial Economics, 20
R. Parrino (1997)
CEO turnover and outside succession A cross-sectional analysisJournal of Financial Economics, 46
B. Hall, Jeffrey Liebman (1997)
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?Organizations & Markets eJournal
M. Huson, R. Parrino, L. Starks (2001)
Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long-Term PerspectiveJournal of Finance, 56
David Denis, Diane Denis (1995)
Performance Changes Following Top Management DismissalsJournal of Finance, 50
Kee Chung, Stephen Pruitt (1994)
A Simple Approximation of Tobin's QCorporate Finance: Valuation
J. Gaver, K. Gaver (1993)
Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policiesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 16
Tod Perry, M. Zenner (2000)
Pay for Performance? Government Regulation and the Structure of Compensation ContractsComparative Political Economy: Regulation eJournal
Hamid Mehran (1995)
Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performanceJournal of Financial Economics, 38
D. Yermack (1994)
Do Corporations Award CEO Stock Options EffectivelyLabor: Personnel Economics
Stuart Gilson (1989)
Management turnover and financial distressJournal of Financial Economics, 25
Anthony Crawford, J. Ezzell, J. Miles (1995)
Bank CEO Pay-Performance Relations and the Effects of DeregulationThe Journal of Business, 68
T. Perry, M. Zenner (2001)
Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contractsJournal of Financial Economics, 62
Kevin Murphy (1985)
Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysisJournal of Accounting and Economics, 7
Scott Barnhart, Stuart Rosenstein (1998)
Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical AnalysisFinancial Accounting eJournal
David Blackwell, James Brickley, Michael Weisback (1994)
Accounting information and internal performance evaluation Evidence from Texas banksJournal of Accounting and Economics, 17
K. H. Chung, S. W. Pruitt (1994)
A simple approximation of Tobin’s QFinancial Management, 23
A. Coughlan, Ronald Schmidt (1985)
Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigationJournal of Accounting and Economics, 7
J. Core, D. Larcker (2000)
Performance Consequences of Mandatory Increases in Executive Stock OwnershipCorporate Finance: Governance
M. Weisbach (1988)
Outside directors and CEO turnoverJournal of Financial Economics, 20
(2003)
Microsoft ushers out era of options
We document changes in compensation structure following CEO turnover and relate them to future performance. Compared to outgoing CEOs, incoming CEOs derive a significantly greater percentage of their compensation from option grants and new stock grants. The voluntary turnover sample shows similar changes in compensation structure while the forced turnover sample results suggest that new stock grants drive the significant increase in incentive compensation following turnover. Post-turnover performance is positively associated with new stock grants as a percentage of total compensation in the full sample and when analyzing forced and voluntary turnovers separately. We find limited evidence that future operating income is positively associated with option grants following forced turnover. Post-turnover improvement in operating income is positively associated with an increase in new stock grants for the incoming relative to the outgoing CEO.
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 24, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.