Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Nathaniel Beck (2001)
Have We Learned in the Past Few Years
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (1996)
Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section ModelsPolitical Analysis, 6
T. Anderson, C. Hsiao (1982)
Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel dataJournal of Econometrics, 18
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (2001)
Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and YoonInternational Organization, 55
R. Alvarez, Jonathan Katz (2000)
Aggregation and Dynamics of Survey Responses: The Case of Presidential Approval
(2000)
Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables
G. Garrett (1998)
Partisan Politics in the Global Economy
Nathaniel Beck (1986)
Estimating Dynamic Models is Not Merely a Matter of Technique
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (1995)
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section DataAmerican Political Science Review, 89
D. Hendry, G. Mizon (1978)
Serial Correlation as a Convenient Simplification, not a Nuisance: A Comment on a Study of the Demand for Money by the Bank of England.The Economic Journal, 88
D. Hibbs (1973)
Problems of Statistical Estimation and Causal Inference in Time-Series Regression ModelsSociological Methodology, 5
(2008)
Lagged Depemdent Variables and Reality: Did you specify that autocorrelation a priori
J. Kiviet (1995)
On bias, inconsistency and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data modelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
(2009)
Modeling dynamics in time - series – cross - section political economy data
(2005)
Which time - series cross - section estimator should I use now ? Guidance from Monte Carlo experiments
James Stimson (1985)
Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical EssayAmerican Journal of Political Science, 29
James Honaker, Gary King (2010)
What to Do about Missing Values in Time‐Series Cross‐Section DataAmerican Journal of Political Science, 54
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz, Richard Tucker (1998)
Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent VariableAmerican Journal of Political Science, 42
Ruth Judson, Ann Owen (1999)
Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for
Suzanna Boef, L. Keele (2008)
Taking Time SeriouslyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 52
R. Engle, C. Granger (1987)
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testingEconometrica, 55
Robin Stryker, E. Huber, J. Stephens (2001)
Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets
K. Im, M. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003)
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panelsJournal of Econometrics, 115
Andrew Levin, C. Lin, C. Chu (2002)
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample propertiesJournal of Econometrics, 108
G. Mizon (1984)
The encompassing approach in econometrics
Nathaniel Beck, K. Gleditsch, K. Beardsley (2006)
Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political EconomyInternational Studies Quarterly, 50
Martin Gibson, R. Little, D. Rubin (1989)
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data.The Statistician, 38
J. Davidson (1978)
Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship Between Consumers' Expenditure and Income in the United KingdomThe Economic Journal, 88
L. Keele, N. Kelly (2006)
Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent VariablesPolitical Analysis, 14
R. Franzese, Jude Hays (2007)
Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section DataPolitical Analysis, 15
C. Granger, P. Newbold (1974)
Spurious regressions in econometricsJournal of Econometrics, 2
Nathaniel Beck (1992)
The Methodology of CointegrationPolitical Analysis, 4
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (2004)
Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo ExperimentsPolitical Analysis, 15
M. Arellano, Stephen Bond (1991)
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment EquationsThe Review of Economic Studies, 58
S. Nickell (1981)
Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed EffectsEconometrica, 49
Nathaniel Beck (1991)
Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential ApprovalPolitical Analysis, 3
G. Garrett, D. Mitchell (2001)
Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECDEuropean Journal of Political Research, 39
P. Huber (1967)
The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions
Travis Pratt, Christopher Lowenkamp (2002)
Conflict Theory, Economic Conditions, and HomicideHomicide Studies, 6
Whitney Newey, K. West (1986)
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance MatrixEconometrics eJournal
This article deals with a variety of dynamic issues in the analysis of time-series––cross-section (TSCS) data. Although the issues raised are general, we focus on applications to comparative political economy, which frequently uses TSCS data. We begin with a discussion of specification and lay out the theoretical differences implied by the various types of dynamic models that can be estimated. It is shown that there is nothing pernicious in using a lagged dependent variable and that all dynamic models either implicitly or explicitly have such a variable; the differences between the models relate to assumptions about the speeds of adjustment of measured and unmeasured variables. When adjustment is quick, it is hard to differentiate between the various models; with slower speeds of adjustment, the various models make sufficiently different predictions that they can be tested against each other. As the speed of adjustment gets slower and slower, specification (and estimation) gets more and more tricky. We then turn to a discussion of estimation. It is noted that models with both a lagged dependent variable and serially correlated errors can easily be estimated; it is only ordinary least squares that is inconsistent in this situation. There is a brief discussion of lagged dependent variables combined with fixed effects and issues related to non-stationarity. We then show how our favored method of modeling dynamics combines nicely with methods for dealing with other TSCS issues, such as parameter heterogeneity and spatial dependence. We conclude with two examples.
Annual Review of Political Science – Annual Reviews
Published: Jun 15, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.