Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Benson, R. Schroeder, Jayant Saraph (1991)
The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigationQuality Engineering, 37
Robert Hamada (1972)
THE EFFECT OF THE FIRM'S CAPITAL STRUCTURE ON THE SYSTEMATIC RISK OF COMMON STOCKSJournal of Finance, 27
W. Deming (1982)
Quality, productivity, and competitive position
Marc Reinganum (1981)
Misspecification of capital asset pricing : Empirical anomalies based on earnings' yields and market valuesJournal of Financial Economics, 9
Myron Scholes, Joseph Williams (1977)
Estimating betas from nonsynchronous dataJournal of Financial Economics, 5
E. Dimson, P. Marsh (1986)
Event study methodologies and the size effectJournal of Financial Economics, 17
T. Dyckman, Donna Philbrick, J. Stephan (1984)
A Comparison of Event Study Methodologies Using Daily Stock Returns: A Simulation ApproachJournal of Accounting Research, 22
J. Gahlon, J. Gentry (1982)
On the Relationship between Systematic Risk and the Degrees of Operating and Financial LeverageFinancial Management, 11
F. Gryna (1970)
Quality planning and analysis
L. Phillips, D. Chang, R. Buzzell (1983)
Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key HypothesesJournal of Marketing, 47
N. Repenning, J. Sterman (1997)
Getting quality the old-fashioned way : self confirming attributions in the dynamics of process improvement
F. Black, Myron Scholes (1973)
The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 81
Michael Barclay, R. Litzenberger (1988)
Announcement effects of new equity issues and the use of intraday price dataJournal of Financial Economics, 21
G. Jarrell, S. Peltzman (1985)
The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of SellersJournal of Political Economy, 93
B. Lev (1974)
On the Association between Operating Leverage and RiskJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9
R. Buzzell, Frederik Wiersema (1981)
Modelling changes in market share: A cross‐sectional analysisSouthern Medical Journal, 2
R. Banz (1981)
The relationship between return and market value of common stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 9
Stephen Brown, Jerold Warner (1980)
MEASURING SECURITY PRICE PERFORMANCEJournal of Financial Economics, 8
Paul Malatesta, Rex Thompson (1985)
Partially anticipated events: A model of stock price reactions with an application to corporate acquisitionsJournal of Financial Economics, 14
Peter Riesz (1979)
Price‐Quality Correlations for Packaged Food ProductsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 13
W. Lederer, V. Singhal (1988)
THE EFFECT OF COST STRUCTURE AND DEMAND RISK IN THE JUSTIFICATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES
J. Mcconnell (1968)
An Experimental Examination of the Price-Quality RelationshipThe Journal of Business, 41
Stephen Brown, Jerold Warner (1985)
Using daily stock returns: The case of event studiesJournal of Financial Economics, 14
Charles Fine (1986)
Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive SystemsManagement Science, 32
Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen (1990)
Anomalous Price Behavior Around Repurchase Tender OffersJournal of Finance, 45
This paper empirically investigates the impact of winning a quality award on the market value of firms by estimating the mean “abnormal” change in the stock prices of a sample of firms on the date when information about winning a quality award was publicly announced. We note that the abnormal returns generated by the quality award winning announcements provide a lower bound for the impact of implementing an effective quality award improvement program. Our results show that the stock market reacts positively to quality award announcements. Statistically significant mean abnormal returns on the day of the announcements ranged from a low of 0.59% to a high of 0.67% depending on the model used to generate the abnormal returns. The reaction was particularly strong for smaller firms (mean abnormal returns ranged from low of 1.16% to a high of 1.26%), and for firms that won awards from independent organizations such as Malcolm Baldrige, Philip Crosby, etc. (mean abnormal returns ranged from a low of 1.31% to a high of 1.65%). Winning a quality award also conveys information about the systematic risk of the firm. We find a statistically significant decrease in the equity and the asset betas after the quality award announcement. There is also evidence to suggest that large firms experience negative stock price performance in the second year before winning quality awards, which is followed by a year of positive performance. Small firms experience a positive stock price performance in the second year before winning quality awards but no negative performance before winning quality awards.
Management Science – INFORMS
Published: Mar 1, 1996
Keywords: Keywords : total quality management ; TQM ; quality awards ; stock market reaction ; event study
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.