Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Ward (1975)
Downstream fate of zooplankton from a hypolimnial release mountain reservoirArchiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 74
J. C. H. Carter, W. D. Taylor, R. Chengalath, D. A. Scruton (1986)
Limnetic zooplankton zooplankton assemblages in Atlantic Canada with special reference to acidificationCan. J. Fish. aquat. Sci., 43
E. Thomas, D. Blinn, P. Keim (1998)
Do xeric landscapes increase genetic divergence in aquatic ecosystemsFreshwater Biology, 40
(1965)
Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.Science, 150 3692
J. Bengtsson (1991)
Interspecific competition in metapopulationsBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 42
R. Forman (1995)
Some general principles of landscape and regional ecologyLandscape Ecology, 10
M. Slatkin (1985)
Gene Flow in Natural PopulationsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 16
D. Jenkins (1995)
Dispersal-limited zooplankton distribution and community composition in new pondsHydrobiologia, 313-314
I. Hanski (1998)
Metapopulation dynamicsNature, 396
J. Shurin (2000)
DISPERSAL LIMITATION, INVASION RESISTANCE, AND THE STRUCTURE OF POND ZOOPLANKTON COMMUNITIESEcology, 81
A. Bohonak, H. Whiteman (1999)
Dispersal of the fairy shrimp Branchinecta coloradensis (Anostraca): Effects of hydroperiod and salamandersLimnology and Oceanography, 44
B. Maguire (1963)
The Passive Dispersal of Small Aquatic Organisms and Their Colonization of Isolated Bodies of WaterEcological Monographs, 33
L. Brendonck, B. Riddoch (1999)
Wind‐borne short‐range egg dispersal in anostracans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda)Biological Journal of The Linnean Society, 67
M. Akopian, J. Garnier, R.Pourriot (1999)
A large reservoir as a source of zooplankton for the river: structure of the populations and influence of fish predationJournal of Plankton Research, 21
D. Jenkins, A. Buikema (1998)
Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and functionEcological Monographs, 68
(1998)
Kansen voor natuurbehoud en -herstel
J. Shurin, J. Havel, M. Leibold, B. Pinel‐Alloul (2000)
LOCAL AND REGIONAL ZOOPLANKTON SPECIES RICHNESS: A SCALE‐INDEPENDENT TEST FOR SATURATIONEcology, 81
A. Bohonak (1999)
Effect of insect-mediated dispersal on the genetic structure of postglacial water mite populationsHeredity, 82
V. Pajunen, P. Rautatiekatu (1986)
Distributional dynamics of Daphnia species in a rock-pool environment
M. Gilpin, I. Hanski (1991)
Metapopulation dynamics : empirical and theoretical investigations
K. Cottenie, N. Nuytten, E. Michels, L. Meester (2004)
Zooplankton community structure and environmental conditions in a set of interconnected pondsHydrobiologia, 442
V. Proctor (1964)
Viability of Crustacean Eggs Recovered From DucksEcology, 45
Beatrice Jann, H. Bürgi (1988)
The drift of zooplankton in a lake-outlet (Glatt) in a day-night-rhythm depending from the water levelSwiss journal of hydrology, 50
M. Boileau, B. Taylor (1994)
Chance events, habitat age, and the genetic structure of pond populationsArchiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 132
A. Bohonak (1999)
Dispersal, Gene Flow, and Population StructureThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 74
J. A. Wiens (1997)
Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution
B. Jann, H. Bürgi (1988)
The drift of zooplankton in a lake outlet (Glatt) in a day-night-rhythm depending from the water levelSchweiz Z. Hydrol., 50
M. Leibold (1999)
Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communitiesEvolutionary Ecology Research, 1
M. Slatkin (1987)
Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations.Science, 236 4803
(1994)
STATISTICA for the windows operating system
D. Jenkins, Marilyn Underwood (1998)
Zooplankton may not disperse readily in wind, rain, or waterfowlHydrobiologia, 387-388
Yolanda Lukaszewski (1999)
Regional versus local processes in determining zooplankton community composition of little Rock Lake, Wisconsin, USAJournal of Plankton Research, 21
V. Proctor, C. Malone (1965)
Further Evidence of the Passive Dispersal of Small Aquatic Organisms via the Intestinal Tract of BirdsEcology, 46
O. Sandlund (1982)
The drift of zooplankton and microzoobenthos in the river Strandaelva, western NorwayHydrobiologia, 94
Margaret Palmer, J.David Allan, C. Butman (1996)
Dispersal as a regional process affecting the local dynamics of marine and stream benthic invertebrates.Trends in ecology & evolution, 11 8
R. Holt (1997)
7 – From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure: Some Consequences of Spatial Heterogeneity
(1951)
The element of chance in pond populations
J. Wiens (1997)
Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology
J. Carter, W. Taylor, R. Chengalath, D. Scruton (1986)
Limnetic Zooplankton Assemblages in Atlantic Canada with Special Reference to AcidificationCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43
R. Stavn (1970)
The application of the dorsal light reaction for orientation in water currents by Daphnia magna StrausZeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 70
U. Dieckmann, Bob O’Hara, W. Weisser (1999)
The evolutionary ecology of dispersalTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 14
(1982)
Questions concerning cosmopolitanism in Cladocera
I. Hanski, E. Ranta (1983)
Coexistence in a Patchy Environment: Three Species of Daphnia in Rock PoolsJournal of Animal Ecology, 52
P. Jakobsen, G. Johnsen (1988)
The influence of food limitation on swarming behaviour in the waterflea Bosmina longispinaAnimal Behaviour, 36
J. V. Ward (1975)
Downstream fate of zooplankton from a hypolimnial release mountain reservoirVerh. int. Ver. Limnol., 19
J. Havel, P. Hebert (1993)
Daphnia lumholtzi in North America: Another exotic zooplankterLimnology and Oceanography, 38
In systems of interconnected ponds or lakes, the dispersal of zooplankton may be mediated by the active population component, with rivulets and overflows functioning as dispersal pathways and the dispersal being unidirectional. Such systems offer the possibility to study the impact of dispersal rates on local population dynamics and community structure, and provide opportunities to quantify dispersal in the field in a straightforward manner. In this study, dispersal of active zooplankton populations among interconnected ponds was quantified directly in the field by sampling the small waterways connecting the ponds. The number of dispersing zooplankton sampled in connecting elements was on average high (almost 7000 ind h−1). However, the contribution of dispersing individuals to total population size in the target ponds was very limited (< 1% 24 h−1.). Only a weak diel pattern in dispersal rates was observed.
Hydrobiologia – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 16, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.