Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Allison, J. Lubchenco, M. Carr (1998)
MARINE RESERVES ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT FOR MARINE CONSERVATIONEcological Applications, 8
K. Clarke, R. Warwick (2001)
Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation
C. Koenig, F. Coleman, C. Grimes, G. Fitzhugh, Kathyryn Scanlon, Christopher Gledhill, Mark Grace (2000)
Protection of fish spawning habitat for the conservation of warm-temperate reef-fish fisheries of shelf-edge reefs of FloridaBulletin of Marine Science, 66
D. Jin, H. Kite-Powell, E. Thunberg, A. Solow, W. Talley (2002)
A model of fishing vessel accident probability.Journal of safety research, 33 4
M. Conroy, B. Noon (1996)
Mapping of Species Richness for Conservation of Biological Diversity: Conceptual and Methodological IssuesEcological Applications, 6
Martin Smith, J. Wilen (2003)
Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behaviorJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46
(1998)
Fisheries Statistics Unit, London. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
E. Sala, O. Aburto‐Oropeza, G. Paredes, Ivan Parra, Juan Barrera, P. Dayton (2002)
A General Model for Designing Networks of Marine ReservesScience, 298
T. Sullivan (2000)
Methods of Social Research
S. Airamé, J. Dugan, K. Lafferty, H. Leslie, D. McArdle, R. Warner (2003)
Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: A case study from the california channel islandsEcological Applications, 13
J. Sanchirico, J. Wilen (2001)
A Bioeconomic Model of Marine Reserve CreationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42
(2003)
Recommendations of the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress
(2004)
An ecosystem spatial analysis for Haida Gwaii
(2004)
Turning the tide: Addressing the impact of fisheries on the marine environment
C. Margules, R. Pressey (2000)
Systematic conservation planningNature, 405
S. Andelman, M. Willig (2002)
Alternative Configurations of Conservation Reserves for Paraguayan Bats: Considerations of Spatial ScaleConservation Biology, 16
F. Gell, C. Roberts (2003)
Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reservesTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 18
J. Horwood, J. Nichols, S. Milligan (2008)
Evaluation of closed areas for fish stock conservationJournal of Applied Ecology, 35
S. Berg (2006)
Snowball Sampling—I
Romola Stewart, H. Possingham (2005)
Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system designEnvironmental Modeling & Assessment, 10
(1997)
An evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental surrogates and modelling techniques in predicting the distribution of biological diversity
Joslin Moore, A. Balmford, Thomas Allnutt, N. Burgess (2004)
Integrating costs into conservation planning across AfricaBiological Conservation, 117
C. Roberts, S. Andelman, G. Branch, R. Bustamante, J. Castilla, J. Dugan, B. Halpern, K. Lafferty, H. Leslie, J. Lubchenco, D. McArdle, H. Possingham, M. Ruckelshaus, R. Warner (2003)
ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING CANDIDATE SITES FOR MARINE RESERVESEcological Applications, 13
A. Fielding, J. Bell (1997)
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence modelsEnvironmental Conservation, 24
R. Pressey, C. Humphries, C. Margules, R. Vane-Wright, P. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 8 4
U. Sumaila, S. Guénette, J. Alder, R. Chuenpagdee (2000)
Addressing ecosystem effects of fishing using marine protected areasJournal of Materials Science, 57
A. Balmford, Pippa Gravestock, N. Hockley, C. McClean, C. Roberts (2004)
The worldwide costs of marine protected areas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 26
D. Holland (2000)
A bioeconomic model of marine sanctuaries on Georges BankCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57
M. Rouget (2003)
Measuring conservation value at fine and broad scales: implications for a diverse and fragmented region, the Agulhas PlainBiological Conservation, 112
(2001)
Biogeography of the OSPAR Maritime Area. A synopsis and synthesis of biogeographical distribution patterns described for the north-east Atlantic. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
S. Polasky, J. Camm, B. Garber-Yonts (2001)
Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in OregonLand Economics, 77
P. Hockey, G. Branch (1997)
Criteria, objectives and methodology for evaluating marine protected areas in South AfricaAfrican Journal of Marine Science, 18
MARXAN version 1.8.6. The Ecology Centre
T. Ward, M. Vanderklift, A. Nicholls, R. Kenchington (1999)
SELECTING MARINE RESERVES USING HABITATS AND SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AS SURROGATES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYEcological Applications, 9
Abstract: Socioeconomic considerations should have an important place in reserve design. Systematic reserve‐selection tools allow simultaneous optimization for ecological objectives while minimizing costs but are seldom used to incorporate socioeconomic costs in the reserve‐design process. The sensitivity of this process to biodiversity data resolution has been studied widely but the issue of socioeconomic data resolution has not previously been considered. We therefore designed marine reserves for biodiversity conservation with the constraint of minimizing commercial fishing revenue losses and investigated how economic data resolution affected the results. Incorporating coarse‐resolution economic data from official statistics generated reserves that were only marginally less costly to the fishery than those designed with no attempt to minimize economic impacts. An intensive survey yielded fine‐resolution data that, when incorporated in the design process, substantially reduced predicted fishery losses. Such an approach could help minimize fisher displacement because the least profitable grounds are selected for the reserve. Other work has shown that low‐resolution biodiversity data can lead to underestimation of the conservation value of some sites, and a risk of overlooking the most valuable areas, and we have similarly shown that low‐resolution economic data can cause underestimation of the profitability of some sites and a risk of inadvertently including these in the reserve. Detailed socioeconomic data are therefore an essential input for the design of cost‐effective reserve networks.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.