Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Abrahams (1984)
Channel Networks: A Geomorphological PerspectiveWater Resources Research, 20
V. Gupta, Oscar Mesa (1988)
Runoff generation and hydrologic response via channel network geomorphology — Recent progress and open problemsJournal of Hydrology, 102
T. Móri, G. Székely (1985)
A note on the background of several Bonferroni–Galambos-type inequalitiesJournal of Applied Probability, 22
D. Gray (1961)
Interrelationships of watershed characteristicsJournal of Geophysical Research, 66
B. Troutman, M. Karlinger (1984)
On the expected width function for topologically random channel networksJournal of Applied Probability, 21
J. Hack (1957)
Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland
Jerry Mueller (1972)
Re-evaluation of the Relationship of Master Streams and Drainage BasinsGeological Society of America Bulletin, 83
W. Feller (1959)
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications
M. Church, D. Mark (1980)
On size and scale in geomorphologyProgress in Physical Geography, 4
Werner Werner, Smart Smart (1973)
Some new methods of topological classification of channel networksGeogr. Anal., 5
V. Gupta, E. Waymire (1983)
On the formulation of an analytical approach to hydrologic response and similarity at the basin scaleJournal of Hydrology, 65
C. Werner (1972)
MODELS FOR HORTON'S LAW OF STREAM NUMBERS*Canadian Geographer, 16
R. Shreve (1967)
Infinite Topologically Random Channel NetworksThe Journal of Geology, 75
L. Jolley, A. Donkin, H. Piggott, D. Ferguson, C. Durell, R. Fawdry, R. Gibbs (1925)
Summation of Series.Mathematics of Computation, 16
J. Moon (1980)
On the expected diameter of random channel networksWater Resources Research, 16
R. Shreve (1974)
Variation of mainstream length with basin area in river networksWater Resources Research, 10
R. Shreve (1966)
Statistical Law of Stream NumbersThe Journal of Geology, 74
Motivated by the empirical relationship between the main channel length and the basin area for river networks, a similar equation is derived analytically using the random model postulates and the additional assumption that link lengths have a common exponential probability distribution. Specifically, it is shown that in networks with large magnitude m, the main channel length l(m), and the magnitude are related by l(m) ∼ β(2π)½(2π)½, where β is mean link length. This result is utilized to explain another empirical relationship between the distance to the center of gravity lc(m) and the main channel length; lc(m) ∼ l(m)/2. The observed deviations of the random model prediction regarding the main channel length from empirical observations is used to discuss some important open problems.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.