Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Kavanagh, W. Mcglasson, R. Mcbride (1986)
Harvest Maturity and Acceptability of Flora-Dade TomatoesJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
R. Buttery, R. Teranishi, L. Ling, R. Flath, D. Stern (1988)
Quantitative studies on origins of fresh tomato aroma volatilesJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36
R. Gómez, R. Varón, M. Amo, J. Tardáguila, J. Pardo (1998)
DIFFERENCES IN THE RATE OF COLORATION IN TOMATO FRUITJournal of Food Quality, 21
C. Wolters, L. Gemert (1990)
Towards an integrated model of sensory attributes, instrumental data and consumer-perception of tomatoes. Part 1. Relation between consumer perception and sensory attributes.
T. Gormley, S. Egan (1978)
Firmness and Colour of the Fruit of Some Tomato Cultivars from Various Sources During StorageJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 29
R. Shewfelt (1990)
Quality of fruits and vegetables : a scientific status summary by the institute of food technologists' expert panel on food safety and nutritionFood Technology, 44
G. Hobson, P. Adams, T. Dixon (1983)
Assessing the colour of tomato fruit during ripeningJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 34
Shewfelt Shewfelt (1990)
Quality of fruits and vegetablesFood Technol, 44
Jones Jones, Scott Scott (1983)
Improvement of tomato flavor by genetically increasing sugar and acid contentsEuphytica, 32
Abad Abad, Anastasio Anastasio (1996)
Posibilidades de utilización de L esculentum var cerasiforme como fuente de variación para componentes del sabor del tomateActa Hort, 14
G. Dodds, J. Brown, P. Ludford (1991)
Surface Color Changes of Tomato and Other Solanaceous Fruit during ChillingJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 116
Nuez Nuez, Fernández Fernández (1994)
Los recursos genéticos de hortalizas en España (1parte)Hortofruticultura, 94
The different physicochemical and colorimetric parameters which define fruit quality were evaluated in 12 varieties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) from several localities in SE Spain, using three widely grown commercial (F1) hybrids as controls. Several local varieties were identified with better scores for specific quality parameters (fruit firmness, soluble solids content, pH, citric and malic acids and lycopene) than the commercially grown hybrids. These may find a place in the market as distinctive quality fruits or as source material for optimal quality characteristics in breeding programmes. The correlations obtained in the overall study of the results point to the advantages and disadvantages of choosing certain quality parameters. The colorimetric study showed that the ratio between the chromatic co‐ordinates of the CIELAB system (a*/b*) separated the fruits of the different varieties as a function of their external colour better than the tomato colour index (TCI). © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.