Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Taylor Taylor (2002)
‘A century of current account dynamics’Journal of International Money and Finance, 21
J. Westerlund (2005)
A Panel CUSUM Test of the Null of CointegrationOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67
Kang Hao, B. Inder (1996)
Diagnostic test for structural change in cointegrated regression modelsEconomics Letters, 50
Allan Gregory, B. Hansen (1996)
Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shiftsJournal of Econometrics, 70
Ho Ho (2002)
‘A Panel cointegration approach to the saving‐investment correlation’Empirical Economics, 27
Lori Leachman (1991)
Saving, investment, and capital mobility among OECD countriesOpen Economies Review, 2
J. Cragg (1983)
MORE EFFICIENT ESTIMATION IN THE PRESENCE OF HETEROSCEDASTICITY OF UNKNOWN FORMEconometrica, 51
K. Im, Junsoo Lee, M. Tieslau (2005)
Panel Lm Unit-Root Tests with Level ShiftsEconometrics eJournal
P. Phillips, H. Moon (1999)
Linear Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel DataEconometrica, 67
Joon Park, P. Phillips (1988)
Statistical Inference in Regressions with Integrated Processes: Part 1Econometric Theory, 4
Alan Taylor (2002)
A Century of Current Account DynamicsNBER Working Paper Series
(1980)
Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows
Gonzalo Gonzalo, Granger Granger (1995)
‘Estimation of common long‐memory components in cointegrated systems’Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13
Tsungwu Ho (2002)
A panel cointegration approach to the investment-saving correlationEmpirical Economics, 27
Özmen Özmen, Parmaksiz Parmaksiz (2004)
‘Policy regime change and the Feldstein‐Horioka puzzle: the UK evidence’Journal of Policy Modeling, 25
P. Alexakis, N. Apergis (1994)
The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle and exchange rate regimes: Evidence from cointegration testsJournal of Policy Modeling, 16
J. Haan, Clemens Siermann (1994)
Saving, investment, and capital mobility: A comment on LeachmanOpen Economies Review, 5
J. Gonzalo (2010)
The Making of "Estimation of Common Long-Memory Components in Cointegrated Systems"Journal of Financial Econometrics, 8
Y. Shin (1994)
A Residual-Based Test of the Null of Cointegration Against the Alternative of No CointegrationEconometric Theory, 10
J. Lemmen, S. Eijffinger (1995)
The quantity approach to financial integration: The Feldstein-Horioka criterion revisitedOpen Economies Review, 6
Lucio Sarno, Mark Taylor (1998)
Exchange controls, international capital flows and saving-investment correlations in the UK: An empirical investigationWeltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 134
S. Mccoskey, C. Kao (1999)
A Monte Carlo Comparison of Tests for Cointegration in Panel DataEconometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - General eJournal
P. Phillips, B. Hansen (1989)
Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables
Park Park, Phillips Phillips (1988)
‘Statistical inference in regressions with integrated regressors: part I’Econometric Theory, 4
B. Hansen (1992)
Tests for Parameter Instability in Regressions with I(1) ProcessesJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10
Daniel Levy (2000)
Investment-Saving Comovement and Capital Mobility: Evidence from Century Long U.S. Time SeriesInternational Finance
Krystyna Strzala (2006)
Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein - Horioka PuzzleDynamic Econometric Models, 7
Christine Amsler, Junsoo Lee (1995)
An LM Test for a Unit Root in the Presence of a Structural ChangeEconometric Theory, 11
Jushan Bai, Pierre Perron (1995)
Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changesEconometrica, 66
C. Kao, S. Mccoskey (1997)
A Residual-Based Test Of The Null Of Cointegration In Panel DataEconometrics
E. Zivot, D. Andrews (1992)
Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root HypothesisJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20
Anne Corbin (2004)
CAPITAL MOBILITY AND ADJUSTMENT OF THE CURRENT ACCOUNT IMBALANCES: A BOUNDS TESTING APPROACH TO COINTEGRATION IN 12 COUNTRIES (1880-2001)International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9
David Harris, B. Inder (1992)
A Test of the Null Hypothesis of Cointegration
Kang Hao (1993)
Testing for structural change in cointegrated regression models: some comparisons and generalizationsEconometric Reviews, 15
Levy Levy (2000)
‘Investment‐saving comovement and capital mobility: evidence from century long U.S. time series’Review of Economic Dynamics, 3
P. Phillips, S. Ouliaris (1990)
Asymptotic Properties of Residual Based Tests for CointegrationEconometrica, 58
A. Banerjee, Massimiliano Marcellino, C. Osbat (2004)
Some Cautions on the Use of Panel Methods for Integrated Series of Macroeconomic DataWiley-Blackwell: Econometrics Journal
P. Saikkonen (1991)
Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Cointegration RegressionsEconometric Theory, 7
W. Bartley, Junsoo Lee, Mark Strazicich (2001)
Testing the null of cointegration in the presence of a structural breakEconomics Letters, 73
Eiji Kurozumi (2002)
Testing for stationarity with a breakJournal of Econometrics, 108
Amsler Amsler, Lee Lee (1995)
‘An LM test for a unit root in the presence of a structural break’Econometric Theory, 11
Mathias Hoffmann (2004)
International capital mobility in the long run and the short run: can we still learn from saving–investment data?Journal of International Money and Finance, 23
Im Im, Lee Lee, Tieslau Tieslau (2005)
‘Panel LM unit root tests with level shifts’Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67
P. Schmidt, P. Phillips (1992)
LM Tests for a Unit Root in the Presence of Deterministic TrendsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54
P. Phillips, B. Hansen (1990)
Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) ProcessesThe Review of Economic Studies, 57
Jushan Bai, Pierre Perron (1998)
Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural-Change Models, 18
Jyh‐Lin Wu (2000)
Mean reversion of the current account: evidence from the panel data unit-root testEconomics Letters, 66
J. MacKinnon (1996)
Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration TestsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 11
Erdal Ozmen, Kagan Parmaksız (2000)
Policy Regime Change and the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: The UK EvidenceMacroeconomics eJournal
J. Coakley, Farida Kulasi, Ronald Smith (1996)
Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein--Horioka PuzzleThe Economic Journal, 106
This paper proposes a Lagrange multiplier (LM) test for the null hypothesis of cointegration that allows for the possibility of multiple structural breaks in both the level and trend of a cointegrated panel regression. The test is general enough to allow for endogenous regressors, serial correlation and an unknown number of breaks that may be located at different dates for different individuals. We derive the limiting distribution of the test and conduct a small Monte Carlo study to investigate its finite sample properties. In our empirical application to the solvency of the current account, we find evidence of cointegration between saving and investment once a level break is accommodated.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.