Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Rustad, C. Cronan (1988)
Element loss and retention during litter decay in a red spruce stand in MaineCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 18
M. Swift, O. Heal, J. Anderson (1979)
Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
T. Seastedt (1984)
The Role of Microarthropods in Decomposition and Mineralization ProcessesAnnual Review of Entomology, 29
Caroline Preston, J. Trofymow, the Group (2000)
Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests.Botany, 78
Berg Berg, Tamm Tamm (1991)
Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of litter in long‐term optimum nutrition experiments. I. Organic matter decomposition in Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) needle litterScand. J. Forest Res., 6
J. Aber, J. Melillo (1980)
Litter decomposition: measuring relative contributions of organic matter and nitrogen to forest soils.Botany, 58
R. Byard, K. Lewis, F. Montagnini (1996)
Leaf litter decomposition and mulch performance from mixed and monospecific plantations of native tree species in Costa RicaAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 58
J. Gosz, G. Likens, F. Bormann (1972)
Nutrient Content of Litter Fall on the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New HampshireEcology, 53
Chapman Chapman, Whittaker Whittaker, Heal Heal (1988)
Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands. AgricEcosyst. Environ., 24
E. Handayanto, G. Cadisch, K. Giller (1997)
Regulating N mineralization from plant residues by manipulation of quality.
E. Salamanca, N. Kaneko, S. Katagiri (1998)
Effects of leaf litter mixtures on the decomposition of Quercus serrata and Pinus densiflora using field and laboratory microcosm methodsEcological Engineering, 10
D. Wardle (2002)
Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components
W. Schlesinger (1991)
Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change
D. Wardle, Karen Bonner, K. Nicholson (1997)
Biodiversity and Plant Litter: Experimental Evidence Which Does Not Support the View That Enhanced Species Richness Improves Ecosystem FunctionOikos, 79
G. Whitney (1991)
Relation of plant species to substrate, landscape position, and aspect in north central MassachusettsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 21
H. Staaf (1980)
Influence of chemical composition, addition of raspberry leaves, and nitrogen supply on decomposition rate and dynamics of nitrogen and phosphorus in beech leaf litterOikos, 35
A. Finzi, C. Canham (1998)
Non-additive effects of litter mixtures on net N mineralization in a southern New England forestForest Ecology and Management, 105
K. Chapman, J. Whittaker, O. Heal (1988)
Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure standsAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 24
J. Trofymow, T. Moore, B. Titus, C. Prescott, I. Morrison, M. Siltanen, Simon Smith, J. Fyles, R. Wein, C. Camiré, L. Duschene, L. Kozak, M. Kranabetter, S. Visser (2002)
Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climateCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 32
J. McArthur, J. Aho, R. Rader, G. Mills (1994)
Interspecific Leaf Interactions during Decomposition in Aquatic and Floodplain EcosystemsJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 13
C. Robinson, J. Kirkham, R. Littlewood (1999)
Decomposition of root mixtures from high arctic plants : a microcosm studySoil Biology & Biochemistry, 31
Lill Lill, Marquis Marquis (2001)
The effects of leaf quality on herbivore performance and attack from natural enemiesOecologia, 126
B. Bushman, Morgan Wang (1995)
A procedure for combining sample correlation coefficients and vote counts to obtain an estimate and a confidence interval for the population correlation coefficient.Psychological Bulletin, 117
Qishui Zhang, J. Zak (1995)
Effects of Gap Size on Litter Decomposition and Microbial Activity in a Subtropical ForestEcology, 76
J. Blair, R. Parmelee, M. Beare (1990)
Decay Rates, Nitrogen Fluxes, and Decomposer Communiies of Single‐ and Mixed‐Species Foliar LitterEcology, 71
B. Williams, Clare Alexander (1991)
Interactions on mixing litters from beneath sitka spruce and scots pine and the effects on microbial activity and N-mineralizationSoil Biology & Biochemistry, 23
D. Hornsby, B. Lockaby, A. Chappelka (1995)
Influence of microclimate on decomposition in loblolly pine stands: a field microcosm approachCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 25
P. Scowcroft (1997)
Mass and nutrient dynamics of decaying litter from Passiflora mollissima and selected native species in a Hawaiian montane rain forestJournal of Tropical Ecology, 13
L. Hedges, I. Olkin (1980)
Vote-counting methods in research synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 88
T. Seastedt, D. Crossley (1984)
The Influence of Arthropods on EcosystemsBioScience, 34
Facelli Facelli (1991)
Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structureBot. Rev., 57
M. McClain, G. Cadisch, K. Giller (1996)
Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and DecompositionEcology
K. Mctiernan, P. Ineson, P. Coward (1997)
Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf litter mixturesOikos, 78
C. Prescott (2004)
Does nitrogen availability control rates of litter decomposition in forests?Plant and Soil, 168-169
Knops Knops, Wedin Wedin, Tilman Tilman (2001)
Biodiversity and decomposition in experimental grassland ecosystemsOecologia, 126
L. Leff, J. McArthur (1989)
The effect of leaf pack composition on processing: A comparison of mixed and single species packsHydrobiologia, 182
M. Carreiro, K. Howe, D. Parkhurst, R. Pouyat (1999)
Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban-rural gradientBiology and Fertility of Soils, 30
R. Aerts (1997)
Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems : a triangular relationshipOikos, 79
E. Ashton, Peter Hogarth, R. Ormond (1999)
Breakdown of mangrove leaf litter in a managed mangrove forest in Peninsular MalaysiaHydrobiologia, 413
N. Kaneko, E. Salamanca (1999)
Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak–pine stand in JapanEcological Research, 14
C. Mcclaugherty, B. Berg (1987)
Cellulose, lignin and nitrogen concentrations as rate regulating factors in late stages of forest litter decompositionPedobiologia
H. Collins, R. Rickman, L. Elliott, D. Bezdicek, R. Papendick (1990)
Decomposition and Interactions among Wheat Residue ComponentsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 54
B. Berg, H. Staaf, T. Persson (1980)
Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition., 32
J. Fyles, I. Fyles (1993)
Interaction of Douglas-fir with red alder and salal foliage litter during decompositionCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 23
Berg Berg, Staaf Staaf (1980)
Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. – In: Persson, T. (ed.), Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous ForestsAn Ecosystem Study. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm), 32
D. Zak, P. Groffman, K. Pregitzer, S. Christensen, J. Tiedje (1990)
THE VERNAL DAM: PLANT-MICROBE COMPETITION FOR NITROGEN IN NORTHERN HARDWOOD FORESTS'Ecology, 71
M. Zimmer (2002)
Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richnessSoil Biology & Biochemistry, 34
R. Hansen, D. Coleman (1998)
Litter complexity and composition are determinants of the diversity and species composition of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) in litterbagsApplied Soil Ecology, 9
W. Thomas (1968)
Decomposition of Loblolly Pine Needles With and Without Addition of Dogwood LeavesEcology, 49
R. Hansen (1999)
Red oak litter promotes a microarthropod functional group that accelerates its decompositionPlant and Soil, 209
M. Nilsson, C. Gallet, A. Wallstedt (1998)
Temporal variability of phenolics and batatasin-III in Empetrum hermaphroditum leaves over an eight-year period: interpretations of ecological functionOikos, 81
A. Pereira, M. Graça, M. Molles (1998)
LEAF LITTER DECOMPOSITION IN RELATION TO LITTER PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, FUNGAL BIOMASS, ARTHROPOD COLONIZATION, AND GEOGRAPHICAL ORIGIN OF PLANT SPECIESPedobiologia, 42
L. Rustad (1994)
Element Dynamics along a Decay Continuum in a Red Spruce Ecosystem in Maine, USAEcology, 75
B. Taylor, W. Parsons, D. Parkinson (1989)
Decomposition of Populus tremuloides leaf litter accelerated by addition of Alnus crispa litterCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 19
C. Prescott, L. Zabek, C. Staley, R. Kabzems (2000)
Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixturesCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 30
V. Meentemeyer (1978)
Macroclimate and Lignin Control of Litter Decomposition RatesEcology, 59
D. Chadwick, P. Ineson, C. Woods, T. Piearce (1998)
Decomposition of Pinus sylvestris litter in litter bags: Influence of underlying native litter layerSoil Biology & Biochemistry, 30
M. Nilsson, D. Wardle, A. Dahlberg (1999)
Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant-soil systemOikos, 86
M. Quemada, M. Cabrera (1995)
Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralized from Leaves and Stems of Four Cover CropsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 59
F. Montagnini, K. Ramstad, F. Sancho (1993)
Litterfall, litter decomposition and the use of mulch of four indigenous tree species in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa RicaAgroforestry Systems, 23
Darlene Mudrick, M. Hoosein, R. Hicks, E. Townsend (1994)
Decomposition of leaf litter in an Appalachian forest: effects of leaf species, aspect, slope position and timeForest Ecology and Management, 68
R. Bardgett, Amanda Shine (1999)
Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslandsSoil Biology & Biochemistry, 31
Heath Heath, Edwards Edwards, Arnold Arnold (1964)
Some methods for assessing the activity of soil animals in the breakdown of leavesPedobiologia, 4
L. Hedges, I. Olkin (1987)
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
A. Hector, A. Beale, A. Minns, S. Otway, J. Lawton (2000)
Consequences of the reduction of plant diversity for litter decomposition: effects through litter quality and microenvironmentOikos, 90
Meentemeyer Meentemeyer (1978)
Macroclimate and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamicsEcology, 59
H. Cooper, L. Hedges (1995)
The Handbook of Research SynthesisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 37
M. Briones, P. Ineson (1996)
Decomposition of eucalyptus leaves in litter mixturesSoil Biology & Biochemistry, 28
B. Hoorens, R. Aerts, M. Stroetenga (2002)
Litter quality and interactive effects in litter mixtures: more negative interactions under elevated CO2?Journal of Ecology, 90
Christine Conn, J. Dighton (2000)
Litter quality influences on decomposition, ectomycorrhizal community structure and mycorrhizal root surface acid phosphatase activitySoil Biology & Biochemistry, 32
B. Berg, C. Tamm (1991)
Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of litter in long‐term optimum nutrition experimentsScandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 6
A. Rothe, D. Binkley (2001)
Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesisCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 31
S. Hobbie, S. Hobbie (1996)
Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundraEcological Monographs, 66
B. Berg (2000)
Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soilsForest Ecology and Management, 133
Literature on plant leaf litter decomposition is substantial, but only in recent years have potential interactions among leaves of different species during decomposition been examined. We review emerging research on patterns of mass loss, changes in nutrient concentration, and decomposer abundance and activity when leaves of different species are decaying in mixtures. Approximately 30 papers have been published that directly examine decomposition in leaf mixtures as well as in all component species decaying alone. From these litter‐mix experiments, it is clear that decomposition patterns are not always predictable from single‐species dynamics. (Characteristics of decomposition in litter‐mixes that deviate from responses predicted from decomposition of single‐species litters alone are designated "non‐additive"; "additive" responses in mixes are predictable from component species decaying alone.) Non‐additive patterns of mass loss were observed in 67% of tested mixtures; mass loss is often (though not always) increased when litters of different species are mixed. Observed mass loss in some mixtures is as much as 65% more extensive than expected from decomposition of single‐species litter, but more often mass loss in mixtures exceeds expected decay by 20% or less. Nutrient transfer among leaves of different species is striking, with 76% of the mixtures showing non‐additive dynamics of nutrient concentrations. Non‐additive patterns in the abundance and activity of decomposers were observed in 55% and 65% of leaf mixes, respectively. We discuss some methodological details that likely contribute to conflicting results among mixed‐litter studies to date. Enough information is available to begin formulating mechanistic hypotheses to explain patterns in litter‐mix experiments. Emerging patterns in the mixed‐litter decomposition literature have implications for relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem function (in this case, the function being decomposition), and for potential mechanisms through which invasive plant species could alter carbon and nutrient dynamics in ecosystems.
Oikos – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.