Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Most ethical theories are based on the assumption that the results of actions are known and are part of the ethical evaluation of moral behaviour. This leads to fundamental problems of the ethical evaluation of future states because the future is by definition unknown. Risks as known uncertainties that result from human action often have morally relevant consequences but they defy easy classification in moral philosophy. As a general idea of how the ethical problems of risk can be addressed, this paper suggests the concept of reflective responsibility. Reflective responsibility is based on the overarching commonalities of all responsibility ascriptions as being open, teleological, and close to action. The concept of reflective responsibility is applied to risk management in software and information systems development. The paper will conclude that successful responsibility ascriptions in risk management are only possible if the socially constructed nature of risk is taken into consideration.
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.