Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/differential-market-reactions-to-revenue-and-expense-surprises-fQCBy7o5XG
References (56)
-
W. Bondt, R. Thaler (1987)
Further Evidence On Investor Overreaction and Stock Market SeasonalityJournal of Finance, 42
-
Kenneth Hackel, J. Livnat, A. Rai (1994)
The Free Cash Flow/Small-Cap AnomalyFinancial Analysts Journal, 50
-
E. F. Fama, K. R. French (1998)
Value versus Growth: The International EvidenceJournal of Finance, 53
-
J. L. Davis, E. Fama, K. R. French (2000)
Characteristics, Covariances and Average ReturnsJournal of Finance, 55
-
J. Jaffe, Donald Keim, R. Westerfield (1989)
Earnings Yields, Market Values, and Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 44
-
(1996)
Differential price reaction to the earnings announcements of glamour and value firms. -
R. Lipe (1986)
The information contained in the components of earningsJournal of Accounting Research, 24
-
Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1993)
Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskBehavioral & Experimental Finance
-
G. Wilson (1986)
THE RELATIVE INFORMATION-CONTENT OF ACCRUALS AND CASH FLOWS - COMBINED EVIDENCE AT THE EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENT AND ANNUAL-REPORT RELEASE DATEJournal of Accounting Research, 24
-
S. Swaminathan, J. Weintrop (1991)
THE INFORMATION-CONTENT OF EARNINGS, REVENUES, AND EXPENSESJournal of Accounting Research, 29
-
S. P. Kothari (2001)
Capital Markets Research in AccountingJournal of Accounting and Economic, 31
-
Donald Keim (1985)
Dividend yields and stock returns: Implications of abnormal January returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 14
-
Growth firms are those at the bottom 33% of all firms ranked according to the ratio of book to market (B/M) value of equity -
Anthony Lynch (2000)
First Draft : March 1999 This Draft : 25 May 2000 Portfolio Choice and Equity Characteristics : Characterizing the Hedging Demands Induced by Return Predictability -
W. Bauman, Robert Miller (1997)
Investor Expectations and the Performance of Value Stocks versus Growth Stocks, 23
-
R. Hoskin, John Hughes, W. Ricks (1986)
Evidence On The Incremental Information-Content Of Additional Firm Disclosures Made Concurrently With EarningsJournal of Accounting Research, 24
-
S. Sivaramakrishnan, Lynn Rees (2001)
Valuation Implications of Revenue ForecastsFinancial Accounting eJournal
-
S. Kothari, I. Thank, Jeffery Abarbanell, Anwer Ahmed, Sudipta Basu, Patricia Dechow, Dan Gode, W. Guay, Charles Lee, Bob Lipe, Michael Mikhail, Jowell Sabino, Jake Thomas, Charles Wasley, Tzachi Zach (2001)
Capital Markets Research in AccountingMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper Series
-
François Degeorge, Jayen Patel, R. Zeckhauser (1999)
Earnings Management to Exceed ThresholdsThe Journal of Business, 72
-
Rafael Porta, Rafael Porta, Josef Lakonishok, Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny, Robert Vishny (1997)
Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market EfficiencyJournal of Finance, 52
-
L. Chan, Yasushi Hamao, Josef Lakonishok (1991)
Fundamentals and Stock Returns in JapanJournal of Finance, 46
-
Kenneth Hackel, J. Livnat, A. Rai (2000)
A Free Cash Flow Investment AnomalyJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15
-
E. Bartov, D. Givoly, C. Hayn (2002)
The Rewards to Meeting or Beating Earnings ExpectationsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 33
-
S. Basu (1977)
Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to their Price-Earnings Ratios -
L. Brown (1986)
Discussion of Evidence on the Incremental Information Content of Additional Firm Disclosures Made Concurrently with EarningsJournal of Accounting Research, 24
-
(1934)
Security Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1934) -
B. Lev (1989)
ON THE USEFULNESS OF EARNINGS AND EARNINGS RESEARCH: LESSONS AND DIRECTIONS FROM TWO DECADES OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCHJournal of Accounting Research, 27
-
V. K. Chow, H. M. Hulburt (2000)
Value, Size and Portfolio Efficiency-The Value Effect Obtains Across BothLarge and Small-Stock PortfoliosJournal of Portfolio Management, 26
-
(2002)
Confirming or Conflicting Sales and Earning Signals: Differential Returns for Growth and Value Companies -
In the two rightmost columns, the table reports significance levels for parametric (non-parametric) tests that value companies have a higher mean (median) than growth companies -
E. Fama, K. R. French (1992)
The Cross-section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 47
-
James Davis (1994)
The Cross-Section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre- Compustat EvidenceJournal of Finance, 49
-
B. Wilson (1979)
The First shall be LastTeaching Statistics, 1
-
John Hand (2000)
Profits, Losses and the Non-Linear Pricing of Internet StocksFinancial Accounting eJournal
-
B. Graham, D. Dodd (1934)
Security Analysis -
B. Rosenberg, K. Reid, R. Lanstein (1984)
Persuasive View of Market InefficiencyJournal of Portfolio Management, 11
-
K. Chow, Heather Hulburt (2000)
Value, Size, and Portfolio Efficiency, 26
-
Marta Ballester, J. Livnat, Chandra Seethamraju (1998)
Individual-Firm Style Loadings, Unrecorded Economic Assets, and Systematic RiskJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 13
-
Peter Easton, M. Zmijewski (1989)
Cross-sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements☆Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11
-
Significance levels (reported in parentheses) below the mean size-adjusted returns are for a t-test that the mean size-adjusted return is equal to zero -
E. Fama, K. French (1996)
Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing AnomaliesJournal of Finance, 51
-
H. Latané, Donald Tuttle, Charles Jones (1969)
E/P Ratios v. Changes in Earnings In Forecasting Future Price ChangesFinancial Analysts Journal, 25
-
Yonca Ertimur, J. Livnat (2002)
Confirming or Conflicting Sales and Earnings Signals, 28
-
Barr Rosenberg., K. Reid, Ronald Lanstein (1985)
Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency, 11
-
S. Basu (1977)
The Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market HypothesisJournal of Finance, 32
-
W. Hopwood, J. Mckeown (1985)
The Incremental Informational Content of Interim Expenses over Interim SalesJournal of Accounting Research, 23
-
M. Bagella, L. Becchetti, A. Carpentieri (2000)
“The first shall be last”. Size and value strategy premia at the London Stock ExchangeJournal of Banking and Finance, 24
-
S. W. Bauman, R. E. Miller (1997)
Investor Expectations and the Performance of Value Stocks Versus GrowthStocks-Why Value Stocks Outperform GrowthStocksJournal of Portfolio Management, 23
-
Eli Bartov, Dan Givoly, Carla Hayn (1999)
The Rewards to Meeting or Beating Earnings ExpectationsFinancial Accounting
-
M. Bagnoli, Sanjay Kallapur, Susan Watts (2001)
Top Line and Bottom Line Forecasts: A Comparison of Internet Firms During and after the BubbleCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation
-
E. Fama, K. French (1995)
Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and ReturnsJournal of Finance, 50
-
Kent Daniel, S. Titman (1998)
Characteristics or Covariances?, 24
-
W. Bondt, R. Thaler (1985)
Does the Stock Market OverreactJournal of Finance, 40
-
H. A. Latane, D. L. Tuttle, C. P. Jones (1969)
E/P Ratios V. Changes In EarningsFinancial Analyst Journal, 25
-
J. Lakonishok, A. Schleifer, R. W. Vishny (1994)
Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskJournal of Finance, 49
-
E. Fama, K. French (1997)
Value Versus Growth: The International EvidenceChicago Booth: Fama-Miller Working Paper Series
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Subject
- Business and Management; Accounting/Auditing; Corporate Finance; Public Finance
- ISSN
- 1380-6653
- eISSN
- 1573-7136
- DOI
- 10.1023/A:1024409311267
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This study investigates investors' reactions to revenue and expense surprises around preliminary earnings announcements. Results show that investors value more highly a dollar of revenue surprise than a dollar of expense surprise. Results further show that these differential market reactions to revenue and expense surprises vary systematically for growth versus value firms and depend on (a) the proportion of variable to total costs, (b) the relative persistence of sales and expenses, and (c) the proportion of operating to total expenses. Results highlight the importance of interpreting the earnings surprise in the context of its sources—e.g. surprise in revenues or in total expenses.
Journal
Review of Accounting Studies – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 2, 2004