Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/substitutability-spatial-structure-and-spatial-interaction-fEYpF26aQr
References (34)
-
V. Ginsburgh, A. Palma, Y. Papageorgiou, Jacques-François Thisse (1985)
The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds under Sufficient HeterogeneityEconometrica, 53
-
Hyson Hyson, Hyson Hyson (1950)
“The Economic Law of Market Areas”The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64
-
E. Sheppard, D. Griffith, L. Curry (1976)
A final comment on mis-specification and autocorrelation in those gravity parametersRegional Studies, 10
-
L. Curry, D. Griffith, E. Sheppard (1975)
Those gravity parameters againRegional Studies, 9
-
A. Chiang (1974)
Fundamental methods of mathematical economics -
E. Sheppard (2010)
Location and the Demand for TravelGeographical Analysis, 12
-
A. Fotheringham, Michael Webber (2010)
Spatial Structure and the Parameters of Spatial Interaction ModelsGeographical Analysis, 12
-
E. Sheppard (1984)
The Distance-Decay Gravity Model Debate -
(1982)
“ Simplified Urban Transportation Planning Procedures Using Census Data -
(1976)
“ A Final Comment on Misspecification and -
A. Borgers, H. Timmermans (1987)
Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects: A simulation experimentRegional Science and Urban Economics, 17
-
M. Beckmann (1971)
Market share, distance and potentialRegional and Urban Economics, 1
-
K. Lancaster (1966)
A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 74
-
Y. Stephanedes, Kumar (1984)
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INTERCITY DEMAND MODELS -
A. Cliff, R. Martin, J. Ord (1975)
Map pattern and friction of distance parameters: reply to comments by R. J. Johnston, and by L. Curry, D. A. Griffith and E. S. SheppardRegional Studies, 9
-
T. Smith (1975)
A choice theory of spatial interactionRegional Science and Urban Economics, 5
-
Curry Curry (1972)
“Spatial Analysis of Gravity Flows”Regional Studies, 6
-
Marc Gaundry, M. Dagenais (1979)
The dogit modelTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 13
-
A. Cliff, R. Martin, J. Ord (1974)
Evaluating the friction of distance parameter in gravity modelsRegional Studies, 8
-
A. Fotheringham (1986)
Modelling Hierarchical Destination ChoiceEnvironment and Planning A, 18
-
B. Boots, P. Kanaroglou (1988)
Incorporating the effects of spatial structure in discrete choice models of migration.Journal of regional science, 28 4
-
J. Hausman, D. Wise (1978)
A CONDITIONAL PROBIT MODEL FOR QUALITATIVE CHOICE: DISCRETE DECISIONS RECOGNIZING INTERDEPENDENCE AND HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES'Econometrica, 46
-
A. Fotheringham (1981)
SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND DISTANCE‐DECAY PARAMETERSAnnals of the Association of American Geographers
-
(1982)
Urban Spatial Structure : An Introductory Essay on Concepts and Criteria -
F. Fetter (1924)
The Economic Law of Market AreasQuarterly Journal of Economics, 38
-
A. Fotheringham (1985)
Spatial Competition and Agglomeration in Urban ModellingEnvironment and Planning A, 17
-
R. Johnston (1975)
Map pattern and friction of distance parameters: a commentRegional Studies, 9
-
A. Lösch (1954)
The economics of location -
(1979)
Disaggregate Travel and Mobility Choice Models and In Behoiwal Traoel Modeling -
A. Fotheringham (1983)
A New Set of Spatial-Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations †Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 15
-
A. Cliff, R. Martin, J. Ord (1976)
A reply to the final commentRegional Studies, 10
-
(1973)
“ On Friction of Distance and Regression Coeficients . ” -
A. Anas (1983)
Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity modelsTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 17
-
Gaudry Gaudry, Dagenais Dagenais (1979)
“The Dogit Model”Transportation Research B, 13
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- 1991 The Ohio State University
- ISSN
- 0016-7363
- eISSN
- 1538-4632
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00229.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This paper attempts to distill the relationship among spatial structure, consumer preferences, and spatial interaction. It introduces the notion of substitutability. Destinations are substitutable in both economic‐behavioral and physical‐locational senses. Inadequate treatment of this can lead to variations in the estimated parameters of conventional spatial interaction models.
Journal
Geographical Analysis – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1991