Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2022)
Model of Socialization in an OrphanageEuropean Journal of Contemporary Education
Yu-Min Wang, Chung-Lun Wei, Hsin‐Hui Lin, Sheng-Ching Wang, Yi-Shun Wang (2022)
What drives students’ AI learning behavior: a perspective of AI anxietyInteractive Learning Environments
O. Tapalova, N. Zhiyenbayeva, Dmitry Gura (2022)
Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning PathwaysElectronic Journal of e-Learning
Min-Chi Chiu, Gwo-jen Hwang, Lu-Ho Hsia, Fong-Ming Shyu (2022)
Artificial intelligence-supported art education: a deep learning-based system for promoting university students’ artwork appreciation and painting outcomesInteractive Learning Environments
Mohamed Hashim, I. Tlemsani, R. Matthews (2022)
A sustainable University: Digital Transformation and BeyondEducation and Information Technologies, 27
N Krnjić, B Latinović, M Ćosić (2021)
Students ‘perceptions of e-learning through online teaching in secondary schoolInternational Journal of Sales Retailing and Marketing, 10
Cong Zhou (2022)
Integration of modern technologies in higher education on the example of artificial intelligence useEducation and Information Technologies, 28
Andy Nguyen, H. Ngo, Y. Hong, Belle Dang, Bich-Phuong Nguyen (2022)
Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in educationEducation and Information Technologies, 28
Tian-xiao Yang, Ya Wang, Yi Wang, Xiao-Min Su, Ke Ni, S. Lui, R. Chan (2021)
Validity and normative data of the Chinese Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) across adolescence, adults and elderly peopleMemory, 30
Shaofeng Wang, Huanhuan Wang, Yanshuang Jiang, Ping Li, Wancheng Yang (2021)
Understanding students’ participation of intelligent teaching: an empirical study considering artificial intelligence usefulness, interactive reward, satisfaction, university support and enjoymentInteractive Learning Environments, 31
Chenglu Li, Wanli Xing, W. Leite (2022)
Using fair AI to predict students’ math learning outcomes in an online platformInteractive Learning Environments
Daniela Benites, William Gomes (2007)
Tradução, adaptação e validação preliminar do Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), 12
Shaofeng Wang, Zhuo Sun, Y. Chen (2022)
Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students' self-efficacy, creativity and learning performanceEducation and Information Technologies, 28
Saman Ebadi, Asieh Amini (2022)
Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners’ motivation using artificial intelligence technology: a case of CSIEC chatbotInteractive Learning Environments
Kun Yao, Hongchang Yang (2020)
Research on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and EducationEducation Reform and Development
Kai-Yu Tang, Ching-Yi Chang, Gwo-jen Hwang (2021)
Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: a systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019)Interactive Learning Environments, 31
Hong-Zhen Fan, Jianjun Zhu, Jian Wang, J. Cui, N. Chen, Jing Yao, S. Tan, Jing-hui Duan, H.T. Pang, Y. Zou (2019)
Four-Subtest Index-based Short Form of WAIS-IV: Psychometric Properties and Clinical UtilityArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34
Zehui Zhan, Yao Tong, Xixin Lan, Baichang Zhong (2022)
A systematic literature review of game-based learning in Artificial Intelligence educationInteractive Learning Environments
Mohammed Al-Sharafi, M. Al-Emran, M. Iranmanesh, Noor Al-Qaysi, N. Iahad, Ibrahim Arpaci (2022)
Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approachInteractive Learning Environments
E. Roivainen (2019)
European and American WAIS IV norms: Cross-national differences in perceptual reasoning, processing speed and working memory subtest scores.Scandinavian journal of psychology
Qi Xia, Thomas Chiu, C. Chai (2022)
The moderating effects of gender and need satisfaction on self-regulated learning through Artificial Intelligence (AI)Education and Information Technologies, 28
Xiaodong Huang (2021)
Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in ChinaEducation and Information Technologies, 26
AS Mambetalina (2012)
Formation of main components of students’ cognitive activity in high schoolWorld Applied Sciences Journal, 20
K. Ijaz, A. Bogdanovych, Tomas Trescak (2017)
Virtual worlds vs books and videos in history educationInteractive Learning Environments, 25
L Yufeia, S Salehb, H Jiahuic, SM Syed (2020)
Review of the application of artificial intelligence in educationIntegration (Amsterdam), 12
Svetlana Rzanova, Alena Vobolevich, S. Dmitrichenkova, E. Dolzhich, L. Mamedova (2022)
Distance learning challenges and prospects during Covid-19 in the context of adolescent educationSocial Work in Mental Health, 20
Lanqin Zheng, Jiayu Niu, Lu Zhong, Juliana Gyasi (2021)
The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysisInteractive Learning Environments, 31
Technological progress has a significant impact on higher education and increases the popularity of artificial intelligence technologies in universities of different countries. This research was based at Tianshui Normal University in China. The authors examined the impact of an interactive learning environment based on artificial intelligence in the context of the preservation of important cognitive functions such as IQ as well as long-term and short-term memory. This research enrolled 539 s-year students. The experimental group (N = 322) consisted of students of the Faculty of Music, who have been studying music for more than one year using artificial intelligence technologies such as mobile applications, video games, music simulators, etc. The control group (N = 217) consisted of students of the Faculty of Arts, who never used the potential of the interactive educational environment during their studies. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) was chosen as the main method. The test results showed that students in the control and experimental groups averaged the same normal intelligence (97.61). At the same time, there was no significant intergroup difference on all four scales: verbal comprehension, perceptual thinking, working memory, and information processing speed (P ≥ 0.05). It has been found that students in both groups equally rarely reported problems in terms of long-term or short-term memory (P ≥ 0.05). The findings can be used to intensify the scientific discussion about the threats and developmental potential of artificial intelligence in higher education.
Education and Information Technologies – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 1, 2024
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cognitive functions; Interactive educational environment; IQ; Long-term memory
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.