Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2007)
A Balance Sheet Perspective
P. Booth (2004)
Leasing Public Land: Policy Debates and International ExperienceTown Planning Review, 75
R. Rajack (2007)
4 th International Urban Research Symposium Commissioned Research Paper on Elements of Good Practice for Public Land Management Does the ownership and management of public land matter to land market outcomes
J. Atack, R. Margo (1998)
“Location, Location, Location!” The Price Gradient for Vacant Urban Land: New York, 1835 to 1900The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16
S. Garba, S. Al-Mubaiyedh (1999)
An assessment framework for public urban land management interventionLand Use Policy, 16
(2001)
Land Market Monitoring for Smart Urban Growth
(2005)
Land Reform Privatization Procedures and Monitoring System. Final Report on Business Access to Land, Prepared for the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation
(2001)
Monitoring and Managing Urban Growth in the United Kingdom
R. Buckley, J. Kalarickal (2006)
Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending - What have we learned?World Bank Publications
(2001)
Identifying Vacant and Buildable Land
(2006)
A Need for Guidance in Countries with Emerging Markets
A. Bertaud, B. Renaud (1997)
Socialist Cities without Land MarketsJournal of Urban Economics, 41
O. Kaganova (1995)
Russian Home-Building in TransitionJournal of Real Estate Literature, 7
G. Peterson (2006)
Land Leasing and Land Sale as an Infrastructure-Financing OptionPublic Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal
(2003)
Tenure Choice for Urban Land Privatization in Ukraine
O. Kaganova, Valeri Tian, Charles Undeland (2001)
Learning how to be efficient property owners and accountable governments: the case of Kyrgyzstan's citiesPublic Administration and Development, 21
(2000)
Current Land Monitoring Practices and Use of GIS: Challenges and Opportunities
Introducing More Transparent and Efficient Land Management in Post-Socialist Cities: Lessons from Kyrgyzstan The Urban Institute (UI) worked with five cities in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan to apply better management practices through the development of Strategic Land Management Plans. Kyrgyzstan transferred property to local governments, but municipal land management had remained poor owing to a proliferation of responsible agencies, lack of rule of law, corruption, and passiveness on the part of local governments. UI worked with local governments to make an inventory of municipal land, publicize the results, and develop a strategy that articulated principles for land management and an implementation plan. This led to several improvements including proper registration of parcels and proactive policies to lease and sell land through open competition. It also established a model for determining public policy that countered corruption and public deliberation of costs and benefits in the use of local assets. Donor involvement to promote good land legislation, the property registration system, and decentralization was also critical to success.
International Journal of Strategic Property Management – de Gruyter
Published: Sep 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.