Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Bond (1982)
Social facilitation: A self-presentational view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42
J. Pessin (1933)
The Comparative Effects of Social and Mechanical Stimulation on MemorizingAmerican Journal of Psychology, 45
G. Sanders, R. Baron (1975)
The motivating effects of distraction on task performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32
Blainey Cg (1980)
Anxiety in the undergraduate medical-surgical clinical student.Journal of Nursing Education, 19
Gates Gates (1924)
The effect of an audience upon performanceJournal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 18
Yerkes Yerkes, Dodson Dodson (1908)
The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formationJournal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18
Zajonc Zajonc (1965)
Social facilitationScience, 149
Z. Ben-Sira (1984)
Chronic illness, stress and coping.Social science & medicine, 18 9
A. Welford (1973)
Stress and performance.Ergonomics, 16 5
S. Wapner, T. Alper (1952)
The effect of an audience on behavior in a choice situation.Journal of abnormal psychology, 47 2
F. Allport (1920)
The influence of the group upon association and thought.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3
R. Wicklund, S. Duval (1971)
Opinion change and performance facilitation as a result of objective self-awareness ☆Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7
G. Gates
The Effect of an Audience Upon Performance. Editorial Comment Upon the Effect of an Audience.The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 18
P. Field (1981)
A phenomenological look at giving an injection.Journal of advanced nursing, 6 4
A. Yerkes (1908)
Review of Modifiability of behavior in its relation to the age and sex of the dancing mouse and The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1
This paper analyses, in terms of social facilitation and stress theories, some of the effects of the presence and actions of instructors on student nurses’ behaviour. The theories imply the existence of a paradox in the training of nurses. The aim of teaching is to reduce errors. Much of the training is done in the presence of instructors and patients. However, the presence of significant others during learning is hypothesized to increase errors, due to fear of failure and embarrassment. Indeed, the analysis of students’ self‐reports describing stressful encounters with instructors indicates that the students tended to perceive the instructors as mainly evaluative. One possible solution to this paradox is to distinguish clearly between the instructive and evaluative roles, to de‐emphasize evaluation, especially during learning, thus (a) reducing potential sources of anxiety and (b) creating a more supportive learning atmosphere. It is also suggested that both instructors and students may benefit from stress‐reduction strategies, such as relaxation training and improved communication.
Journal of Advanced Nursing – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1986
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.