Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dermer Dermer (1973)
Cognitive characteristics and the perceived importance of informationThe Accounting Review, 48
Blaylock Blaylock, Brightman Brightman, Garcha Garcha, Harsha Harsha, Hermanson Hermanson (1979)
Successful marriages of the third kindBusiness, 29
Theodore Mock (1973)
A longitudinal study of some information structure alternativesData Base, 5
I. Benbasat, Ronald Taylor (1978)
The Impact of Cognitive Styles on Information System DesignMIS Q., 2
M. Bariff, E. Lusk (1977)
Cognitive and Personality Tests for the Design of Management Information SystemsManagement Science, 23
I. Myers (1962)
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962).
Gorry Gorry, Scott‐Morton Scott‐Morton (1971)
A framework for management information systemsSloan Management Review, 13
Theodore Mock, Teviah Estrin, M. Vasarhelyi (1972)
Learning Patterns, Decision Approach, and Value of InformationJournal of Accounting Research, 10
Stephen Barkin, G. Dickson (1977)
An investigation of information system utilizationInf. Manag., 1
R. Zmud (1979)
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE*Management Science, 25
William Wright (1979)
Properties of judgment models in a financial settingOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23
R. Zmud (1978)
Note—On the Validity of the Analytic-Heuristic Instrument Utilized in “The Minnesota Experiments”Management Science, 24
Joyce Joyce (1977)
Expert judgment in audit program planningJournal of Accounting Research: Studies on Human Information Processing, 15
Pratt Pratt (1980)
The effects of personality on a subject's information process: A commentThe Accounting Review, 55
P. Watkins (1982)
PERCEIVED INFORMATION STRUCTURE: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM DESIGNDecision Sciences, 13
M. Alavi, J. Henderson (1981)
An Evolutionary Strategy for Implementing a Decision Support SystemManagement Science, 27
Libby Libby, Lewis Lewis (1977)
Human information processing research in accounting: The state of the artAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2
M. Kendall, B. Smith (1939)
The Problem of $m$ RankingsAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 10
J. Henderson, P. Nutt (1980)
The Influence of Decision Style on Decision Making BehaviorManagement Science, 26
P. Cooley (1977)
A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR PERCEPTION OF RISKJournal of Finance, 32
Driver Driver, Mock Mock (1975)
Human information processing, decision style theory, and accounting information systemsThe Accounting Review, 50
D. Larcker, V. Lessig (1980)
PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION: A PSYCHOMETRIC EXAMINATION*Decision Sciences, 11
R. Ashton (1974)
Cue utilization and expert judgments: A comparison of independent auditors with other judges.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59
Bariff Bariff, Lusk Lusk (1977)
Cognitive and personality tests in designing MISManagement Science, 23
R. Mason, I. Mitroff (1973)
A Program for Research on Management Information SystemsManagement Science, 19
I. Mitroff, V. Barabba, R. Kilmann (1977)
The Application of Behavioral and Philosophical Technologies to Strategic Planning: A Case Study of a Large Federal AgencyManagement Science, 24
R. Kilmann, I. Mitroff (1976)
Qualitative versus Quantitative Analysis for Management Science: Different Forms for Different Psychological TypesInterfaces, 6
Benbasat Benbasat, Taylor Taylor (1978)
The impact of cognitive styles on information systems designManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 2
Mischel Mischel (1973)
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personalityPsychological Bulletin, 8
ABSTRACT The desirability of a merger/acquisition alternative depends in part on the perceptions of the decision maker. What sources of information are “useful” to the decision maker & Does the set of useful information remain constant for all decision makers; if not, do individuals using similar information sets have similar information processing characteristics? Do these sets vary as feedback is obtained during the decision process? To answer these questions, graduate students participated in a modified Delphi experiment, and the resulting data were analyzed by the two‐way aligned‐ranks nonparametric test. These test results affirm that in a merger/acquisition scenario, decision makers with different cognitive styles prefer different sets of information and these sets vary dynamically as feedback is incorporated in the decision‐making process. Furthermore, information that contains worker and community welfare considerations is identified as “useful” five times more frequently by decision makers with a “feeling” cognitive style than those with a “thinking” style.
Decision Sciences – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1984
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.