Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Bazerman, T. Giuliano, A. Appelman (1984)
Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision makingOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33
S. Barton, D. Duchon, Kenneth Dunegan (1989)
An Empirical Test of Staw and Ross's Prescriptions for the Management of Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Organizations*Decision Sciences, 20
E. Aronson (1968)
Theories of cognitive consistencyDecision Sciences
R. Reinehr (1965)
The relation between score on the stimulus variation scale and autokinetic movementPsychonomic Science, 3
R. Herrnstein (1961)
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 4
T. Bateman (1986)
THE ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN SEQUENTIAL DECISION MAKING: SITUATIONAL AND PERSONAL MODERATORS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS*Decision Sciences, 17
A. Bandura (1986)
Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theoryDecision Sciences
M. Singer, A. Singer (1986)
Individual differences and the escalation of commitment paradigmJournal of Social Psychology, 126
M. Singer (1986)
Age stereotypes as a function of profession.The Journal of social psychology, 126 5
Glen Whyte (1991)
Diffusion of responsibility : effects on the escalation tendencyJournal of Applied Psychology, 76
S. L. Barton, D. Duchon, K. J. Dunegan (1989)
An empirical test of Staw and Ross' prescriptions for the management of escalation of commitment behavior in organizationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20
Barry Staw (1976)
Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16
Sonia Goltz (1992)
A sequential learning analysis of decisions in organizations to escalate investments despite continuing costs or losses.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 25 3
T. S. Bateman (1986)
The escalation of commitment in sequential decision making: Situational and personal moderators and limiting conditionsAcademy of Management Review, 17
Barry Staw, Frederick Fox (1977)
Escalation: The Determinants of Commitment to a Chosen Course of ActionHuman Relations, 30
Lloyd Sandelands, J. Brockner, M. Glynn (1988)
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: Effects of persistence-performance contingencies, ego involvement, and self-esteem on task persistence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
Barry Staw, Jerry Ross (1978)
Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23
Brendan O'Flaherty, Judith Komaki (1992)
Going beyond with Bayesian updating.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 25 3
E. Capaldi (1992)
The organization of behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 25 3
Mark Davis, P. Bobko (1986)
Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision makingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37
M. H. Bazerman, T. Giuliano, A. Appelman (1984)
Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision makingAcademy of Management Review, 33
E. Conlon, G. Wolf (1980)
The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior: An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26
R. Eisenberger, J. Carlson, Michael Frank (1979)
Transfer of Persistence to the Acquisition of a New BehaviourQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31
Barry Staw, Jerry Ross (1989)
Understanding Behavior in Escalation SituationsScience, 246
The present study examined the combined effects of responsibility and reinforcement history on investment responses during a series of failure experiences. Subjects performed a variation of the A and S decision case [27] under one of six conditions varying in responsibility (high, low) and reinforcement history (variable partial, fixed partial, no training). When investment responses at the start of the period of continuous losses were examined, results indicated that high responsibility and a variable history of reinforcement are both necessary conditions for escalation to occur. When later responses were included in the analysis, reinforcement history and time were the main factors affecting recommitment responses. These results suggest possible refinements to current models of escalation.
Decision Sciences – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.