Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Hastings (1980)
Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for spaceTheoretical Population Biology, 18
P. Chesson (2000)
General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments.Theoretical population biology, 58 3
S. Pacala, J. Roughgarden (1982)
Spatial heterogeneity and interspecific competitionTheoretical Population Biology, 21
G. Lei, I. Hanski (1998)
Spatial dynamics of two competing specialist parasitoids in a host metapopulationJournal of Animal Ecology, 67
S. Nee, R. May (1992)
Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistenceJournal of Animal Ecology, 61
D. Murrell, R. Law (2002)
Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitorsEcology Letters, 6
L. Benjamin (1999)
A comparison of different rules of partitioning of crop growth between individual plantsEcological Modelling, 115
R. May, M. Hassell (1981)
The Dynamics of Multiparasitoid-Host InteractionsThe American Naturalist, 117
P. Chesson (1985)
Coexistence of Competitors in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments: A Look at the Combined Effects of Different Sorts of VariabilityTheoretical Population Biology, 28
R. Macarthur, R. Levins (1967)
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 101
J. Skellam (1951)
Random dispersal in theoretical populationsBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 53
Robin Snyder, P. Chesson (2003)
Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneityEcology Letters, 6
J. Levine, M. Rees (2002)
Coexistence and Relative Abundance in Annual Plant Assemblages: The Roles of Competition and ColonizationThe American Naturalist, 160
R. Paine (1966)
Food Web Complexity and Species DiversityThe American Naturalist, 100
W. Murdoch, A. Oaten (1975)
Predation and Population StabilityAdvances in Ecological Research, 9
J. Connell, J. Connell (1971)
On the role of the natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees
E. E. Holmes, H. B. Wilson (1998)
Running from Trouble: Long‐Distance Dispersal and the Competitive Coexistence of Inferior SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 151
P. Amarasekare (2003)
Diversity–stability relationships in multitrophic systems: an empirical explorationJournal of Animal Ecology, 72
D. Tilman, R. May, C. Lehman, M. Nowak (1994)
Habitat destruction and the extinction debtNature, 371
P. Amarasekare (2002)
Interference competition and species coexistenceProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269
A. Watkinson, W. Sutherland (1995)
Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinksJournal of Animal Ecology, 64
P. Amarasekare, R. Nisbet (2001)
Spatial Heterogeneity, Source‐Sink Dynamics, and the Local Coexistence of Competing SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 158
Murdoch Murdoch, Oaten Oaten (1975)
Population and population stabilityAdv. Ecol. Res., 9
É. Kisdi, S. Geritz (2002)
On the Coexistence of Perennial Plants by the Competition‐Colonization Trade‐OffThe American Naturalist, 161
J. Gurevitch, Laura Morrow, Alison Wallace, Joseph Walsh (1992)
A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field ExperimentsThe American Naturalist, 140
H. Comins, I. Noble (1985)
Dispersal, Variability, and Transient Niches: Species Coexistence in a Uniformly Variable EnvironmentThe American Naturalist, 126
P. Amarasekare (2000)
Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: local vs. spatial mechanismsEcology, 81
Armstrong (1980)
Competitive exclusionAm. Nat., 115
S. Harrison, C. Thomas, T. Lewinsohn (1995)
Testing a Metapopulation Model of Coexistence in the Insect Community on Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea)The American Naturalist, 145
R. Holt, J. Grover, D. Tilman (1994)
Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent CompetitionThe American Naturalist, 144
R. Armstrong, R. McGehee (1976)
Coexistence of species competing for shared resources.Theoretical population biology, 9 3
C. Bográn, K. Heinz, M. Ciomperlik (2002)
INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION AMONG INSECT PARASITOIDS: FIELD EXPERIMENTS WITH WHITEFLIES AS HOSTS IN COTTONEcology, 83
D. Purves, Richard Law (2002)
Experimental derivation of functions relating growth of Arabidopsis thaliana to neighbour size and distanceJournal of Ecology, 90
R. Kadmon, A. Shmida (1990)
Spatiotemporal Demographic Processes in Plant Populations: An Approach and a Case StudyThe American Naturalist, 135
A. Shmida, Stephen Ellner (1984)
Coexistence of plant species with similar nichesVegetatio, 58
S. Levin (1974)
Dispersion and Population InteractionsThe American Naturalist, 108
D. Wilson (1992)
Complex Interactions in Metacommunities, with Implications for Biodiversity and Higher Levels of SelectionEcology, 73
D. Tilman (1994)
Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured HabitatsEcology, 75
J. Gurevitch, L. Hedges (1999)
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSESEcology, 80
F. Adler, J. Mosquera (2000)
IS SPACE NECESSARY? INTERFERENCE COMPETITION AND LIMITS TO BIODIVERSITYEcology, 81
P. Amarasekare (2000)
The geometry of coexistenceBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 71
S. Pacala, Mark Rees (1998)
Models Suggesting Field Experiments to Test Two Hypotheses Explaining Successional DiversityThe American Naturalist, 152
C. Briggs (1993)
Competition Among Parasitoid Species on a Stage-Structured Host and Its Effect on Host SuppressionThe American Naturalist, 141
S. Geritz, E. Meijden, J. Metz (1999)
Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability.Theoretical population biology, 55 3
C. Ray, M. Hoopes, I. Hanski, M. Gilpin (1997)
Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution
B. Bolker, S. Pacala (1999)
Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short DispersalThe American Naturalist, 153
C. Codeço, James Grover (2001)
Competition along a Spatial Gradient of Resource Supply: A Microbial Experimental ModelThe American Naturalist, 157
M. Hassell (2000)
Host–parasitoid population dynamicsJournal of Animal Ecology, 69
M. Loreau, N. Mouquet (1999)
Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species DiversityThe American Naturalist, 154
D. Murrell, D. Purves, R. Law (2002)
Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17
R. Levins, D. Culver (1971)
Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 68 6
P. Chesson (2000)
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 31
P. Chesson, N. Huntly (1997)
The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological CommunitiesThe American Naturalist, 150
R. Holt, G. Polis (1997)
A Theoretical Framework for Intraguild PredationThe American Naturalist, 149
S. Muko, Y. Iwasa (2000)
Species coexistence by permanent spatial heterogeneity in a lottery model.Theoretical population biology, 57 3
D. Force (1970)
Competition among four Hymenopterous parasites of an endemic insect host.Annals of The Entomological Society of America, 63
N. Mouquet, M. Loreau (2002)
Coexistence in Metacommunities: The Regional Similarity HypothesisThe American Naturalist, 159
Douglas Yu, H. Wilson (2001)
The Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off Is Dead; Long Live the Competition‐Colonization Trade‐offThe American Naturalist, 158
S. Pacala, D. Tilman (1994)
Limiting Similarity in Mechanistic and Spatial Models of Plant Competition in Heterogeneous EnvironmentsThe American Naturalist, 143
D. Tilman (1983)
Resource competition and community structure.Monographs in population biology, 17
Gry Gundersen, E. Johannesen, H. Andreassen, R. Ims (2001)
Source–sink dynamics: how sinks affect demography of sourcesEcology Letters, 4
R. Levins (1969)
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological ControlBulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15
P. Amarasekare (2000)
Spatial dynamics in a host–multiparasitoid communityJournal of Animal Ecology, 69
Theoretical developments in spatial competitive coexistence are far in advance of empirical investigations. A framework that makes comparative predictions for alternative hypotheses is a crucial element in narrowing this gap. This review attempts to synthesize spatial competition theory into such a framework, with the goal of motivating empirical investigations that adopt the comparative approach. The synthesis presented is based on a major axis, coexistence in spatially homogeneous vs. heterogeneous competitive environments, along which the theory can be organized. The resulting framework integrates such key concepts as niche theory, spatial heterogeneity and spatial scale(s) of coexistence. It yields comparative predictions that can guide empirical investigations.
Ecology Letters – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.