Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Holmstrom Holmstrom (1982)
Moral hazard in teamsThe Bell Journals of Economics, 13
Bolton Bolton, Scharfstein Scharfstein (1996)
Optimal debt structure and the number of creditorsJournal of Political Economy, 104
Denis Denis, Mihov Mihov (2003)
The choice among bank debt, non‐bank private debt and public debt: Evidence from new corporate borrowingsJournal of Financial Economics, 70
Biais Biais, Gollier Gollier (1997)
Trade credit and credit rationingReview of Financial Studies, 10
Gertner Gertner, Scharfstein Scharfstein (1991)
A theory of workouts and the effect of reorganization lawThe Journal of Finance, 46
Ross Ross (1977)
The Determination of financial structure: The incentive signaling approachBell Journal of Economics, 8
Bernardo Bernardo, Talley Talley (1996)
Investment policy and exit‐exchange offers within financially distressed firmsThe Journal of Finance, 51
Aghion (1992)
An incomplete contract approach to financial contractingReview of Economic Studies, 59
Diamond Diamond, Dybvig Dybvig (1983)
Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidityJournal of Political Economy, 91
Grossman Grossman, Hart Hart (1980)
Takeover bids, the free‐rider problem, and the theory of the corporationBell Journal of Economics, 11
Petersen Petersen, Rajan Rajan (1997)
Trade credit: Theories and evidenceReview of Financial Studies, 10
Zingales Zingales (1995)
Insiders ownership and the decision to go publicReview of Economic Studies, 62
Pagano Pagano, Röell Röell (1998)
The choice of stock ownership structure: Agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go publicThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113
Greenbaum Greenbaum, Kanatas Kanatas, Venezia Venezia (1989)
Equilibrium pricing under the bank‐client relationshipJournal of Banking and Finance, 13
Burkart Burkart, Gromb Gromb, Panunzi Panunzi (1997)
Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firmQuarterly Journal of Economics, 112
Petersen Petersen, Rajan Rajan (1995)
The effect of credit market competition on lending relationsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110
ABSTRACT Our model assumes that creditors need to expend resources to collect on claims. Consequently, because diffuse creditors suffer from mutual free‐riding (Holmstrom (1982)), they fare worse than concentrated creditors (e.g., a house bank). The model predicts that measures of debt concentration relate positively to creditors' (aggregate) debt collection expenditures and positively to management's chosen expenditures to resist paying. However, collection activity is purely redistributive, so social waste is larger when creditors are concentrated. If borrower quality is not known, the best firms choose the most concentrated creditors and pay higher expected yields.
The Journal of Finance – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.