Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Branch, G. Nicholson, S. Dworkin (1977)
Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 28 3
McKearney McKearney, Barrett Barrett (1975)
Punished behavior: Increases in responding after d ‐amphetaminePsychopharmacologia, 41
Geller Geller, Kulak Kulak, Seifter Seifter (1962)
The effects of chlordiazepoxide and chlorpromazine on a punishment discriminationPsychopharmacologia, 3
Modification of the behavioral effects of drugs by environmental variables
N. Goeders, J. Smith (1983)
Cortical dopaminergic involvement in cocaine reinforcement.Science, 221 4612
D. Sanger, D. Blackman (1976)
Rate-dependent effects of drugs: A review of the literaturePharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 4
D. McMillan (1975)
Determinants of drug effects on punished responding.Federation proceedings, 34 9
D. Sanger (1987)
Effects of Drugs on Schedule-Controlled Behavior
W. Wuttke, R. Kelleher (1970)
Effects of some benzodiazepines on punished and unpunished behavior in the pigeon.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 172 2
R. Spealman (1979)
Comparison of drug effects on responding punished by pressurized air or electric shock delivery in squirrel monkeys: pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, d-amphetamine and cocaine.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 209 2
P. Dews (1955)
Studies on behavior. I. Differential sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance in pigeons depending on the schedule of reward.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 113 4
J. Barrett (1977)
Behavioral history as a determinant of the effects of d-amphetamine on punished behaviorScience, 198
(1985)
Sodium dependent [ 3 H ] cocaine binding associated with dopamine uptake sites in the rat striatum and human putamen decrease after dopaminergic denervation and in Parkinson ' s disease
J. Mckearney, J. Barrett (1978)
Schedule-Controlled Behavior and the Effects of Drugs
R. Kelleher, W. Morse (1968)
Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs.Ergebnisse der Physiologie, biologischen Chemie und experimentellen Pharmakologie, 60
D. McMillan (1973)
Drugs and punished responding. I. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 19 1
I. Geller, R. Hartmann, K. Blum (1972)
The effects of low-dose combinations of D-amphetamine and cocaine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 14 4
V. Houser (1978)
The Effects of Drugs on Behavior Controlled by Aversive Stimuli
M. Branch, M. Branch, L. Gollub (1974)
A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 21 3
Jeffery Jeffery, Barrett Barrett (1979)
Effects of chlordiazepoxide on comparable rates of punished and unpunished respondingPsychopharmacology, 64
D. Foree, F. Moretz, D. McMillan (1973)
Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 20 2
M. Wilson (1977)
The effect of cocaine and D-amphetamine on punished responding.Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie, 227 1
L. Cook, A. Catania (1964)
EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON AVOIDANCE AND ESCAPE BEHAVIOR.Federation proceedings, 23
(1986)
The role of behavioral and pharmacological history in determining the effects of abused drugs
Geller Geller, Seifter Seifter (1960)
The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d ‐amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the ratPsychopharmacologia, 1
Linda Kennedy, I. Hanbauer (1983)
Sodium‐Sensitive Cocaine Binding to Rat Striatal Membrane: Possible Relationship to Dopamine Uptake SitesJournal of Neurochemistry, 41
Wilson Mc (1977)
The effect of cocaine and D-amphetamine on punished responding.Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de thérapie, 227
Similar rates of punished and nonpunished responding, maintained with equated rates of reinforcement, were established in pairs of rats. One subject of each pair was exposed to a random‐ratio schedule of food presentation. The interreinforcement intervals for this subject comprised the intervals of a random‐interval schedule of reinforcement for the other (yoked) rat. The random‐ratio schedule maintained rates of responding higher than those maintained by the same rate of reinforcement schedule according to the yoked random‐interval contingency. A random‐ratio schedule of electric foot shock added to the random‐ratio schedule of food presentation suppressed rates of responding such that similar rates of responding were observed in rats of both groups. Pentobarbital (3.0 to 17.0 mg/kg) increased punished responding at doses that had little effect on or decreased nonpunished responding, whereas cocaine (5.6 to 30 mg/kg) increased nonpunished responding at doses that decreased or did not alter punished responding. Qualitatively different effects of pharmacological agents on punished and nonpunished responding can be obtained using procedures that generate similar rates and temporal patterns of punished and nonpunished responding. The effects of pentobarbital and cocaine on responding can be determined by factors other than simply the baseline rate of responding.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.