Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Marital disruption and economic well‐being: a comparative analysis

Marital disruption and economic well‐being: a comparative analysis Summary. Though there is a considerable literature concerned with the economic consequences of marital breakdown, there is still substantial disagreement in terms of its magnitude. One of the major problems underlying this debate is how economic well‐being is defined. We implement several measures of well‐being of monetary and multidimensional nature by using data from the European Community Household Panel. Another issue in this literature concerns selection bias of divorcing couples. We tackle this issue by using a propensity score matching technique combined with a difference‐in‐differences estimator. Results confirm the importance of the definition of well‐being. We find a strong gender bias when using monetary measures but a considerably lower bias, and for some countries non‐existent, when using non‐monetary indices. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) Wiley

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/marital-disruption-and-economic-well-being-a-comparative-analysis-Xo74f0aaSY

References (72)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0964-1998
eISSN
1467-985X
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00483.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary. Though there is a considerable literature concerned with the economic consequences of marital breakdown, there is still substantial disagreement in terms of its magnitude. One of the major problems underlying this debate is how economic well‐being is defined. We implement several measures of well‐being of monetary and multidimensional nature by using data from the European Community Household Panel. Another issue in this literature concerns selection bias of divorcing couples. We tackle this issue by using a propensity score matching technique combined with a difference‐in‐differences estimator. Results confirm the importance of the definition of well‐being. We find a strong gender bias when using monetary measures but a considerably lower bias, and for some countries non‐existent, when using non‐monetary indices.

Journal

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)Wiley

Published: Jul 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.