Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad‐scale bird studies

Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad‐scale bird studies Abstract Ideally, one seeks to assess landscapes for their capacity to sustain viable populations of all local species. This applies to much‐affected landscapes and also to restored landscapes. In most circumstances, it is prohibitive to conduct full demographic and dispersal studies of many species of birds (or other taxa) at many sites, which typifies many conservation problems. Here I report upon outcomes of elicitations of views of expert ornithologists on how they would weight a range of breeding behaviours and evidence for success of breeding in remnants or replanted sites. Such consensus results potentially could be used by workers to assess how alternative conservation and management actions affect breeding success. While the data are tailored specifically to Australian woodland birds, the method can be adapted easily for other taxa and habitats. I also summarize some of the experts' main caveats on weightings. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Austral Ecology Wiley

Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad‐scale bird studies

Austral Ecology , Volume 32 (5) – Aug 1, 2007

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/consensus-weightings-of-evidence-for-inferring-breeding-success-in-XLv07xzO9Z

References (21)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1442-9985
eISSN
1442-9993
DOI
10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01714.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Ideally, one seeks to assess landscapes for their capacity to sustain viable populations of all local species. This applies to much‐affected landscapes and also to restored landscapes. In most circumstances, it is prohibitive to conduct full demographic and dispersal studies of many species of birds (or other taxa) at many sites, which typifies many conservation problems. Here I report upon outcomes of elicitations of views of expert ornithologists on how they would weight a range of breeding behaviours and evidence for success of breeding in remnants or replanted sites. Such consensus results potentially could be used by workers to assess how alternative conservation and management actions affect breeding success. While the data are tailored specifically to Australian woodland birds, the method can be adapted easily for other taxa and habitats. I also summarize some of the experts' main caveats on weightings.

Journal

Austral EcologyWiley

Published: Aug 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.