Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES

VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES Male and female subjects who differed in their verbal reports of visual image vividness were tested for recall in three experiments involving coloured photographs as stimuli. In all three experiments subjects who reported vivid visual imagery were more accurate in recall than subjects who reported poor visual imagery. In the first two experiments, females recalled more accurately than males. On the assumption that vividness reports and recall were both mediated by the same covert event ‐ a visual image ‐ these results provide further evidence that images have an important role in memory. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png British Journal of Psychology Wiley

VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES

British Journal of Psychology , Volume 64 (1) – Feb 1, 1973

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/visual-imagery-differences-in-the-recall-of-pictures-X1OT0r9GnY

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1973 The British Psychological Society
ISSN
0007-1269
eISSN
2044-8295
DOI
10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Male and female subjects who differed in their verbal reports of visual image vividness were tested for recall in three experiments involving coloured photographs as stimuli. In all three experiments subjects who reported vivid visual imagery were more accurate in recall than subjects who reported poor visual imagery. In the first two experiments, females recalled more accurately than males. On the assumption that vividness reports and recall were both mediated by the same covert event ‐ a visual image ‐ these results provide further evidence that images have an important role in memory.

Journal

British Journal of PsychologyWiley

Published: Feb 1, 1973

There are no references for this article.