Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Stuart, Francis Churchill, Zehra Graham, G. Hall, Thomas Balf (2008)
Life outside of RCRA: The Lab-XL experienceJournal of Chemical Health and Safety, 15
Jason Venetoulis (2001)
Assessing the ecological impact of a universityInternational Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2
(2004)
Learning by doing: environmental performance improvement in UK higher education
D. Fogel, M. House (2010)
How to Plan, Change, and Improve Environmental Sustainability OutcomesSustainability: The Journal of Record, 3
J. Merkel, Larry Litten (2007)
The sustainability challengeNew Directions for Institutional Research, 2007
(1996)
Beyond Growth, Beacon Press, Boston, MA
T. Kuhn, David Hawkins (1963)
The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsAmerican Journal of Physics, 31
(2004)
UVM’s environmental impact: application of ecological footprint analysis
Debra Rowe (2007)
Education for a Sustainable FutureScience, 317
D. Reider, P. Partner (2012)
Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System
(2004)
Cultivating a shared environmental vision at Middlebury College
Doug McKenzie‐Mohr (1999)
Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing
J. Petersen, Vladislav Shunturov, K. Janda, Gavin Platt, K. Weinberger (2007)
Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real‐time visual feedback and incentivesInternational Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8
(2008)
Think systemically, act cooperatively
(2003)
Reporting for Sustainability: Guidance for Higher Education Institutions, Forum for the Future, London
Alexander Lidgren, H. Rodhe, D. Huisingh (2006)
A systemic approach to incorporate sustainability into university courses and curriculaJournal of Cleaner Production, 14
L. Sharp (2002)
Green campuses: the road from little victories to systemic transformationInternational Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3
H. Rittel, M. Webber (1973)
Dilemmas in a general theory of planningPolicy Sciences, 4
J. Elder (2008)
Research and Solutions: Think Systemically, Act Cooperatively: The Key to Reaching a Tipping Point for the Sustainability Movement in Higher EducationSustainability: The Journal of Record, 1
R. Koester, James Eflin, J. Vann (2006)
Greening of the campus: a whole-systems approachJournal of Cleaner Production, 14
R. Beddoe, R. Costanza, J. Farley, Eric Garza, J. Kent, I. Kubiszewski, Luz Martinez, Tracy McCowen, Kathleen Murphy, N. Myers, Zach Ogden, K. Stapleton, J. Woodward (2009)
Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106
Purpose – University campuses behave as complex systems, and sustainability in higher education is best seen as an emergent quality that arises from interactions both within an institution and between the institution and the environmental and social contexts in which it operates. A framework for strategically prioritizing campus sustainability work is needed. This paper seeks to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach – First, a conceptual model is developed for understanding institutions of higher education as systems. Second, a leverage points framework is applied to experiences at the University of Vermont in order to evaluate campus sustainability efforts. Finally, real‐world examples are used to analyze and prioritize campus sustainability leverage points for advancing organizational change. Findings – This systems thinking approach identifies key leverage points for actions to improve sustainability on campus. The leverage points framework is found to be valuable for: evaluating the potential of individual programs or actions to produce system‐wide change; coordinating individual programs into a strategic effort to improve the system; and making connections between campus and the surrounding social and environmental contexts. Advancing campus sustainability is found to be strengthened by particular ways of thinking and an organizational culture committed to continuous improvements and learning improved ways of doing business based on environmental and social, as well as institutional, benefits. Originality/value – Campus sustainability workers must develop a prioritization process for evaluating which ideas to move forward on first. Systems thinking can cultivate our ability to consciously redesign and work with the systems that are in place, to intentionally pursue organizational improvements, and to plan and coordinate sustainability programs with potential for big changes.
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 4, 2013
Keywords: Campus sustainability; Leverage points; Systems; Organizational change; Complexity; Universities
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.