Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Robert Miller, James Williams, Jack Williams (1989)
Extinctions of North American Fishes During the past CenturyFisheries, 14
G. West, James Brown, B. Enquist (1997)
A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology, 276
D. Penny (1992)
The comparative method in evolutionary biologyJournal of Classification, 9
D. Goodman (1987)
Viable populations for conservationJournal of Biogeogeography
Gerald Smith (1978)
Biogeography of Intermountain fishesGreat Basin naturalist memoirs, 2
A. Echelle, C. Hocutt, E. Wiley (1987)
The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater FishesCopeia, 1987
(1986)
Ichthyofaunal patterns on a geographic grid
(1987)
The demography of chance extinction. Viable populations for conservation (ed. by M.E. Soulé), pp. 11–34
J. Brown, P. Marquet, M. Taper (1993)
Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of FitnessThe American Naturalist, 142
B. Maurer (1999)
Untangling Ecological Complexity: The Macroscopic Perspective
N. Pidgen, C. Ragin (1987)
The Comparative Method
(1981)
Effects of habitat size on species richness and adult body sizes of desert fishes
T. Root (1988)
Environmental Factors Associated with Avian Distributional BoundariesJournal of Biogeography, 15
(1995)
Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
J. Felsenstein (1985)
Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 125
J. Damuth (1981)
Population density and body size in mammalsNature, 290
G. Stebbins (1978)
Evolution of Species Modes of Speciation Michael J. D. WhiteBioScience, 28
D. Goodman (1987)
Viable Populations for Conservation: The demography of chance extinction
J. Felsenstein (1985)
Phylogenies and the comparative methodConservation Biology, 125
J.H. Brown (1995)
MacroecologyAmerican Naturalist
J. Kuikka (1997)
Allometric scaling laws in biology.Science, 278 5337
James Brown, and Stevens, Dawn Kaufman (1996)
THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal StructureAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 27
K. Gaston, T. Blackburn (1996)
Conservation Implications of Georaphic Range Size—Body Size RelationshipsConservation Biology, 10
James Brown, B. Maurer (1987)
Evolution of Species Assemblages: Effects of Energetic Constraints and Species Dynamics on the Diversification of the North American AvifaunaThe American Naturalist, 130
(1981)
Effects of habitat size on species richness
M. Westoby, M. Leishman, J. Lord (1995)
On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correctionJournal of Ecology, 83
J. Hack (1957)
Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland
K. Schmidt‐Nielsen (1984)
Scaling, why is animal size so important?
M. Pyron (1999)
Relationships between geographical range size, body size, local abundance, and habitat breadth in North American suckers and sunfishesJournal of Biogeography, 26
James Brown, B. Maurer (1989)
Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on ContinentsScience, 243
Jack Williams, James Johnson, D. Hendrickson, S. Contreras-Balderas, James Williams, Miguel Navarro‐Mendoza, D. McAllister, J. Deacon (1979)
Fishes of North America Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern: 1989Fisheries, 14
Christopher Taylor, N. Gotelli (1994)
The Macroecology of Cyprinella: Correlates of Phylogeny, Body Size, and Geographical RangeThe American Naturalist, 144
R. Bailey, D. Lee, C. Gilbert, C. Hocutt, R. Jenkins, D. McAllister, J. Stauffer (1980)
Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes
North American freshwater fishes were studied to determine whether they displayed the same relationships between log (geographical range size) and log (body size) and the same pattern of range shape as found among North American birds and mammals. The forces that produce these patterns were also investigated. The log (geographical range size) : log (body size) relationship was analysed for 121 North American freshwater fish species. Thirty‐two imperilled species were compared with 89 non‐imperilled species to determine if the overall relationship could result from differential extinction. Range geometries were analysed, within and among habitat guilds, to determine if general patterns could be detected. The log (geographical range size) : log (body size) pattern among freshwater fish species was triangular and qualitatively similar to that found for North American birds and mammals. The results suggest that below a minimum geographical range, the likelihood of extinction increases dramatically for freshwater fishes and that this minimum range size increases with body size. The pattern of fish species’ range shapes differs from that found for other North American vertebrate taxa because, on average, fish possess much smaller ranges than terrestrial species and most fish species’ geographical ranges extend further on a north–south axis than on an east–west axis. The log (geographical range size) : log (body size) pattern reveals that fish species’ geographical ranges are more constrained than those of terrestrial species. The triangular relationship may be caused by differential extinction of species with large bodies and small geographical ranges as well as higher speciation rates of small‐bodied fish. The restricted geographical ranges of freshwater fishes gives them much in common with terrestrial species on oceanic islands. Range shape patterns within habitat guilds reflect guild‐specific historical and current ecological forces. The overall pattern of range shapes emerges from the combination of ecologically different subunits.
Global Ecology and Biogeography – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.