Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Baker, R. Allmaras (1990)
System for Automating and Multiplexing Soil Moisture Measurement by Time‐Domain ReflectometrySoil Science Society of America Journal, 54
F. Bormann, G. Likens (1979)
Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem.
G. Topp, W. Zebchuk, J. Davis, W. Bailey (1984)
THE MEASUREMENT OF SOIL WATER CONTENT USING A PORTABLE TDR HAND PROBECanadian Journal of Soil Science, 64
G. Topp, J. Davis, A. Annan (1980)
Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission linesWater Resources Research, 16
G. Topp, J. Davis, A. Annan (1982)
Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content Using TDR: II. Evaluation of Installation and Configuration of Parallel Transmission Lines1Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46
G. Topp, J. Davis (1985)
Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) and Its Application to Irrigation Scheduling*, 3
S. Zegelin, I. White, D. Jenkins (1989)
Improved field probes for soil water content and electrical conductivity measurement using time domain reflectometryWater Resources Research, 25
G. Topp, J. Davis (1985)
Measurement of Soil Water Content using Time‐domain Reflectrometry (TDR): A Field EvaluationSoil Science Society of America Journal, 49
T. Yeh, L. Gelhar, A. Gutjahr (1985)
Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 3. Observations and ApplicationsWater Resources Research, 21
G. Topp, J. Davis, A. Annan (1982)
Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content Using TDR: I. Applications to Wetting Fronts and Steep GradientsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 46
A multiplexing time domain reflectoinetry (TDR) system for real‐time monitoring of volumetric soil moisture content was developed. The system was tested at a remote field site in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire. The average value of soil moisture content in the top 500 mm of soil was measured every 4 hours for 1 year at 12 locations within a 12‐ by 18‐m plot. The system functioned well except when the air temperature dropped below −15°C, which caused the data logger tape recorder to stop. Calibrations run on undisturbed soil cores did not compare well with published curves developed for mineral soils, probably because of high soil organic matter content. The standard error of estimate of soil moisture content, indicated by the calibrations, was 0.02 cm3/cm3. The standard deviation of repeated moisture content measurements made in the field was 0.003 cm3/cm3. The effect of cable length on the TDR signal was investigated. It was found that long cables tend to attenuate the signal, ultimately making the measurement impractical. However, cable length had little effect on the calibration up to a length of 27 m. The coefficient of variation of the moisture content measurements taken at any given time ranged from 0.12 to 0.21 during the test period. As predicted by a stochastic analysis of soil moisture flow in heterogeneous soil, the spatial variability of the measurements decreased as average soil moisture increased.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: May 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.