Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Effect of Timber Harvest on the Fool Creek Watershed, 30 Years Later

The Effect of Timber Harvest on the Fool Creek Watershed, 30 Years Later The Fool Creek watershed at the Fraser Experimental Forest, Colorado was harvested using a pattern of alternating clearcut and forested strips in 1956. Today, with almost 30 years of postharvest record, subtle impacts on the hydrology of the watershed can be detected that were not significant in the past. In addition to the depositional increases in the snowpack in the openings, average peak water equivalent over the entire watershed has been increased (9%). Long‐term, postharvest, climatic records now available show a strong correlation between estimated increases in flow and winter and melt period precipitation. Much of the annual variability in increased flow, now explained by precipitation, was formerly attributed to regrowth or time. Peak discharges, advanced 7.5 days following harvest, have also been increased 20%, with the largest effect occurring in the wettest years. Increases in peak water equivalent, annual flow, and date of peak flow occurrence all appear to be returning to preharvest levels at a very slow rate. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Water Resources Research Wiley

The Effect of Timber Harvest on the Fool Creek Watershed, 30 Years Later

Water Resources Research , Volume 21 (12) – Dec 1, 1985

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-effect-of-timber-harvest-on-the-fool-creek-watershed-30-years-VNSFC4PTLC

References (24)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
This paper is not subject to U.S.Copyright © 1986 by the American Geophysical Union.
ISSN
0043-1397
eISSN
1944-7973
DOI
10.1029/WR021i012p01915
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Fool Creek watershed at the Fraser Experimental Forest, Colorado was harvested using a pattern of alternating clearcut and forested strips in 1956. Today, with almost 30 years of postharvest record, subtle impacts on the hydrology of the watershed can be detected that were not significant in the past. In addition to the depositional increases in the snowpack in the openings, average peak water equivalent over the entire watershed has been increased (9%). Long‐term, postharvest, climatic records now available show a strong correlation between estimated increases in flow and winter and melt period precipitation. Much of the annual variability in increased flow, now explained by precipitation, was formerly attributed to regrowth or time. Peak discharges, advanced 7.5 days following harvest, have also been increased 20%, with the largest effect occurring in the wettest years. Increases in peak water equivalent, annual flow, and date of peak flow occurrence all appear to be returning to preharvest levels at a very slow rate.

Journal

Water Resources ResearchWiley

Published: Dec 1, 1985

There are no references for this article.