Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. King, M. West (1987)
Experiences of Innovation at WorkJournal of Managerial Psychology, 2
L. James, Allan Jones (1974)
Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin, 81
L. Cronbach, W. Warrington (1951)
Time-limit tests: Estimating their reliability and degree of speedingPsychometrika, 16
O. Jones (1992)
Postgraduate scientists and R&D: the role of reputation in organisational choiceR & D Management, 22
Gouldner Gouldner (1957)
Cosmopolitans and LocalsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2
M. West, J. Farr (1989)
Innovation at work:psychological perspectives, 4
Annamaria Garden (1989)
Correlates of turnover propensity of software professionals in small high tech companiesR & D Management, 19
Jones Jones, Sullivan Sullivan (1994)
Establishing the Determinants of Departmental Reputation: The Case of R&D ScientistsR&D Management, 24
R. Goldsmith, T. Matherly (1987)
Adaption—innovation and creativity: A replication and extensionBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 26
J. Raelin (1985)
The basis for the professional's resistance to managerial controlHuman Resource Management, 24
G. Ekvall (1993)
Creativity in Project Work: a longitudinal study of a product development projectCreativity and Innovation Management, 2
F. Hull (1988)
Inventions from R & D: Organizational Designs for Efficient Research PerformanceSociology, 22
S. Siegel, W. Kaemmerer (1978)
Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63
Allan Jones, L. James (1979)
Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions☆Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23
A. Gouldner (1957)
Cosmopolitans and locals : toward an analysis of latent social roles-IIAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2
Cronbach Cronbach (1951)
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsPsychometrika, 16
This paper details a study of over 400 R&D scientists in 10 technology‐based organisations. There were two objectives, first, to establish whether employees differentiated between organisation according to their reputations for a commitment to scientific research. Secondly, to identify the factors which ‘determined’ a good or bad reputation. The results indicate that an innovatory climate is the main determinant of an R&D Department's reputation. That is, the extent to which R&D employees believe their organisation is a good place in which to practice science is dependent upon whether or not they are encouraged to be creative and innovatory. Job satisfaction was also strongly linked to a good reputation and it is argued that this confirms the importance of an innovatory climate for R&D scientists.
Creativity and Innovation Management – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.