Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Breakdown of resistance in cotton to cotton leaf curl disease in Pakistan

Breakdown of resistance in cotton to cotton leaf curl disease in Pakistan Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), a devastating disorder of cotton in Pakistan, is caused by a whitefly‐transmitted begomovirus ( Cotton leaf curl virus ; CLCuV) that requires a satellite DNA β to cause disease symptoms ( Mansoor ., 1993 ; Briddon ., 2001 ). CLCuD‐resistant cotton varieties, in which no virus can be detected, have been developed through conventional breeding ( Rahman ., 2002 ). During the 2001 growing season, symptoms of CLCuD were observed on all hitherto resistant varieties at Burewala, District Vehari, Pakistan, and by 2002 disease symptoms were seen throughout the district. To determine if a resistance‐breaking strain of CLCuV had arisen, resistant and susceptible varieties were grown in the field at NIBGE (Faisalabad) and at the Cotton Research Station (Vehari). Plants of six commercial virus‐resistant varieties (CIM 448, CIM 443, CIM 446, CIM 473, CIM 435 and FH 900) showed no disease symptoms at Faisalabad, while susceptible varieties S‐12 and CIM70 had symptoms typical of CLCuD. At Vehari, plants of the same six resistant varieties showed between 15 and 50% infection, while the two susceptible varieties were all infected. Scions of CLCuD‐affected resistant varieties, collected from Vehari, were grafted onto 10 plants of each resistant genotype at NIBGE. This resulted in disease symptoms on 20–40% of plants, confirming a breakdown of resistance. To identity the resistance‐breaking virus, nucleic acid was extracted from plants with and without symptoms collected at both sites. Samples were Southern‐blotted and probed with a biotinylated DNA A clone of CLCuV. The probe detected both the ss and ds DNA forms characteristic of begomoviruses, confirming the association of a begomovirus with the disease. Universal primers for DNA β of CLCuV were used to amplify DNA β from leaves with symptoms collected from resistant varieties in the Vehari area and the PCR product from one location was cloned in a T/A cloning vector (Fermentas). Since CLCuV DNA β is specific to CLCuV ( Briddon ., 2003 ), a DNA β cloned from cotton plants of resistant varieties showing symptoms of CLCuD in the Burewala area was used as a disease‐specific probe in Southern blot hybridizations. The probe hybridized only with DNA extracted from CLCuV affected cotton plants while no signal was detected from a tomato plant ( Lycopersicon esculentum ) that was previously shown to be associated with a DNA β distinct from that associated with CLCuV ( Briddon ., 2003 ). Samples collected from both locations hybridized with this probe. A duplicate blot was probed with a previously reported CLCuV DNA β ( Briddon ., 2001 ) and this resulted in a similar pattern of hybridization. Based on the data presented here, it was concluded that the plants of resistant varieties were infected with CLCuV ( Briddon ., 2001 ). These results strongly suggest the emergence of a resistance‐breaking strain of CLCuV in Pakistan. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Plant Pathology Wiley

Breakdown of resistance in cotton to cotton leaf curl disease in Pakistan

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/breakdown-of-resistance-in-cotton-to-cotton-leaf-curl-disease-in-VB0Uf9dJbc

References (4)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0032-0862
eISSN
1365-3059
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-3059.2003.00893.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), a devastating disorder of cotton in Pakistan, is caused by a whitefly‐transmitted begomovirus ( Cotton leaf curl virus ; CLCuV) that requires a satellite DNA β to cause disease symptoms ( Mansoor ., 1993 ; Briddon ., 2001 ). CLCuD‐resistant cotton varieties, in which no virus can be detected, have been developed through conventional breeding ( Rahman ., 2002 ). During the 2001 growing season, symptoms of CLCuD were observed on all hitherto resistant varieties at Burewala, District Vehari, Pakistan, and by 2002 disease symptoms were seen throughout the district. To determine if a resistance‐breaking strain of CLCuV had arisen, resistant and susceptible varieties were grown in the field at NIBGE (Faisalabad) and at the Cotton Research Station (Vehari). Plants of six commercial virus‐resistant varieties (CIM 448, CIM 443, CIM 446, CIM 473, CIM 435 and FH 900) showed no disease symptoms at Faisalabad, while susceptible varieties S‐12 and CIM70 had symptoms typical of CLCuD. At Vehari, plants of the same six resistant varieties showed between 15 and 50% infection, while the two susceptible varieties were all infected. Scions of CLCuD‐affected resistant varieties, collected from Vehari, were grafted onto 10 plants of each resistant genotype at NIBGE. This resulted in disease symptoms on 20–40% of plants, confirming a breakdown of resistance. To identity the resistance‐breaking virus, nucleic acid was extracted from plants with and without symptoms collected at both sites. Samples were Southern‐blotted and probed with a biotinylated DNA A clone of CLCuV. The probe detected both the ss and ds DNA forms characteristic of begomoviruses, confirming the association of a begomovirus with the disease. Universal primers for DNA β of CLCuV were used to amplify DNA β from leaves with symptoms collected from resistant varieties in the Vehari area and the PCR product from one location was cloned in a T/A cloning vector (Fermentas). Since CLCuV DNA β is specific to CLCuV ( Briddon ., 2003 ), a DNA β cloned from cotton plants of resistant varieties showing symptoms of CLCuD in the Burewala area was used as a disease‐specific probe in Southern blot hybridizations. The probe hybridized only with DNA extracted from CLCuV affected cotton plants while no signal was detected from a tomato plant ( Lycopersicon esculentum ) that was previously shown to be associated with a DNA β distinct from that associated with CLCuV ( Briddon ., 2003 ). Samples collected from both locations hybridized with this probe. A duplicate blot was probed with a previously reported CLCuV DNA β ( Briddon ., 2001 ) and this resulted in a similar pattern of hybridization. Based on the data presented here, it was concluded that the plants of resistant varieties were infected with CLCuV ( Briddon ., 2001 ). These results strongly suggest the emergence of a resistance‐breaking strain of CLCuV in Pakistan.

Journal

Plant PathologyWiley

Published: Dec 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.