Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Alan Monroe (1998)
Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980-1993Public Opinion Quarterly, 62
S. Soroka, Christopher Wlezien (2004)
Degrees of Democracy: Public Preferences and Policy in Comparative Perspective
(1974)
Linkage Models of the Political System
Alan Monroe (1979)
Consistency between Public Preferences and National Policy DecisionsAmerican Politics Research, 7
Christopher Wlezien (1995)
The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for SpendingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 39
Benjamin Page, R. Shapiro (1992)
The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences
Benjamin Page (1994)
Democratic Responsiveness? Untangling the Links Between Public Opinion and PolicyPS: Political Science & Politics, 27
J. March, Johan Olsen (1983)
The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political LifeAmerican Political Science Review, 78
Christopher Wlezien (2004)
Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and PolicyThe Journal of Politics, 66
G. Amyot (1985)
Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries Arend Lijphart New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984, pp. xv, 229Canadian Journal of Political Science, 18
Arend Lijphart (2000)
Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countriesCrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs, 30
S. McCann, Benjamin Page, R. Shapiro (1994)
The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy PreferencesPolitical Psychology, 15
(1990)
Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Western Europe
(2004)
Autocorrelation: From Practice to Theory
Joel Brooks (1990)
THE OPINION-POLICY NEXUS IN GERMANYPublic Opinion Quarterly, 54
Judith Bara (2001)
Tracking estimates of public opinion and party policy intentions in Britain and the USA
M. Laver, John Garry (2000)
Estimating policy positions from political textsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 44
Warren Miller, Donald Stokes (1963)
Constituency Influence in CongressAmerican Political Science Review, 57
D. Nelson (1988)
Public Opinion and Public Policy
P. Mitchell (2000)
Voters and their representatives: electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democraciesEuropean Journal of Political Research, 37
R. Dahl (1960)
Pluralist Democracy In The United StatesBirchandra State Central Library,tripura
K. Krippendorff (1980)
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
P. Hall, Rosemary Taylor (1996)
Political Science and the Three New InstitutionalismsPolitical Studies, 44
Joel Brooks (1985)
Democratic Frustration in the Anglo-American Polities: a Quantification of Inconsistency Between Mass Public Opinion and Public PolicyPolitical Research Quarterly, 38
G. Powell (2000)
Elections as instruments of democracy : majoritarian and proportional visions
K. Krippendorff (1980)
Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
J. Wilson (2002)
Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Lawrence R. Jacobs , Robert Y. Shapiro
(1996)
Danish Midway Election Studies
C. Granger, P. Newbold (1974)
Spurious regressions in econometricsJournal of Econometrics, 2
E. Immergut (1998)
The Theoretical Core of the New InstitutionalismPolitics & Society, 26
D. Weakliem (2003)
PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH AND POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY
Joel Brooks (1987)
The Opinion-Policy Nexus in France: Do Institutions and Ideology Make a Difference?The Journal of Politics, 49
M. McCombs (1972)
Agenda setting function of mass mediaPublic Relations Review, 3
Christopher Wlezien (1996)
Dynamics of Representation: The Case of US Spending on DefenceBritish Journal of Political Science, 26
Steven Delue (1991)
Minority government and majority ruleHistory of European Ideas, 13
Michael Mackuen, S. Coombs (1981)
More Than News: Media Power in Public Affairs
S. Soroka, Christopher Wlezien (2009)
Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy
H. Clarke, H. Norpoth, P. Whiteley (1998)
It's About Time: Modelling Political and Social Dynamics
D. Austen-Smith, J. Banks (1988)
Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative OutcomesAmerican Political Science Review, 82
J. Geer (1996)
From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: A Theory of Democratic Leadership
Danish Gallup pre-Maastricht referendum interviews 1992 (DDA 1835)
John Garry (2001)
The Computer Coding of Political Texts: Results from Britain, Germany, Ireland and Norway
H. Schmitt, J. Thomassen (1995)
Dynamic RepresentationEuropean Union Politics, 1
(1996)
British General Election Study, Campaign Panel
(1958)
Selected British Gallup Opinion Polls
Erik Herron (2005)
Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political BehaviorPerspectives on Politics, 3
(1993)
Issues, Dimensions, and Agenda Change in Postwar Democracies: Longterm Trends in Party Election Programs and Newspaper Reports in Twenty-three Democracies
Richard Hofferbert, I. Budge (1992)
The Party Mandate and the Westminster Model: Election Programmes and Government Spending in Britain, 1948–85British Journal of Political Science, 22
C. Pateman (1970)
Participation and democratic theory
M. Laver (2003)
Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors
Barry Burden, J. Sanberg (2003)
Budget Rhetoric in Presidential Campaigns from 1952 to 2000Political Behavior, 25
F. Brettschneider (1996)
PUBLIC OPINION AND PARLIAMENTARY ACTION: RESPONSIVENESS OF THE GERMAN BUNDESTAG IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVEInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8
Christopher Wlezien (2005)
On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’ ☆Electoral Studies, 24
H. Clarke, Marianne Stewart, P. Whiteley (1997)
Tory Trends: Party Identification and the Dynamics of Conservative Support Since 1992British Journal of Political Science, 27
Benjamin Page, R. Shapiro (1983)
Effects of Public Opinion on PolicyAmerican Political Science Review, 77
The ability of a political system to respond to the preferences of its citizens is central to democratic theory and practice; yet most empirical research on government responsiveness has concentrated on the United States. As a result, we know very little about the nature of government policy responsiveness in Europe and we have a poor understanding of the conditions that affect cross-national variations. This comparative study examines the relationship between public opinion and policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Denmark during the past three decades. We address two key questions: First, are the government's policy intentions driven by public opinion or vice versa? Second, do political institutions influence the level of government responsiveness? We suggest that public opinion tends to drive the government's policy intentions due to the threat of electoral sanction, and that this is more pronounced in proportional systems than in majoritarian democracies.
Political Studies – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.