Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/applicant-reactions-to-selection-procedures-TvakzhMj7n
References (61)
-
R. Arvey, W. Strickland, Gail Drauden, C. Martin (1990)
MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKINGPersonnel Psychology, 43
-
G. Latham, L. Saari, E. Pursell, M. Campion (1980)
The situational interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65
-
S. Chuah, F. Drasgow, B. Roberts (2006)
Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No☆Journal of Research in Personality, 40
-
M. Konovsky, R. Cropanzano (1991)
Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 76 5
-
K. Murphy, G. Thornton, D. Reynolds (1990)
COLLEGE STUDENTS’ATTITUDES TOWARD EMPLOYEE DRUG TESTING PROGRAMSPersonnel Psychology, 43
-
Richard Seymour (1988)
Why plaintiffs' counsel challenge tests, and how they can successfully challenge the theory of “validity generalization”Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33
-
B. Weiner (1985)
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.Psychological review, 92 4
-
Jerald Greenberg, T. Tyler (1987)
Why procedural justice in organizations?Social Justice Research, 1
-
J. Thibaut, L. Walker (1978)
A Theory of ProcedureCalifornia Law Review, 66
-
B. Schneider (1972)
Organizational climate: Individual preferences and organizational realities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 56
-
A. Colman, C. Norris, Carolyn Preston (1997)
Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths: Equivalence of Scores from 5-Point and 7-Point ScalesPsychological Reports, 80
-
P. Herriot (2004)
Social Identities and Applicant ReactionsInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12
-
S. Rynes, A. Barber (1990)
Applicant Attraction Strategies: An Organizational PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 15
-
Michael Harris, Laurence Fink (1987)
A FIELD STUDY OF APPLICANT REACTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES: DOES THE RECRUITER MAKE A DIFFERENCE?Personnel Psychology, 40
-
T. Bauer, D. Truxillo, Matthew Paronto, Jeff Weekley, M. Campion (2004)
Applicant Reactions to Different Selection Technology: Face-to-Face, Interactive Voice Response, and Computer-Assisted Telephone Screening InterviewsInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12
-
P. Podsakoff, D. Organ (1986)
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and ProspectsJournal of Management, 12
-
I. Coyne, Tim Warszta, S. Beadle, Noreen Sheehan (2005)
The Impact of Mode of Administration on the Equivalence of a Test Battery: A Quasi‐Experimental DesignInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13
-
S. Booth-Kewley, G. Larson, Dina Miyoshi (2007)
Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnairesComput. Hum. Behav., 23
-
H. Kelley (1967)
Attribution theory in social psychology, 15
-
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1998)
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.Psychological Bulletin, 124
-
Ute Hülsheger, G. Maier, Thorsten Stumpp (2007)
Validity of General Mental Ability for the Prediction of Job Performance and Training Success in Germany: A Meta-AnalysisWiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment
-
D. Bartram, Anna Brown (2004)
Online Testing: Mode of Administration and the Stability of Opq 32i ScoresInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12
-
Robert Ployhart, C. Harold (2004)
The Applicant Attribution-Reaction Theory (AART): An Integrative Theory of Applicant Attributional ProcessingInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12
-
M. Augoustinos, I. Walker, N. Donaghue (1996)
Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction -
R. Folger, M. Konovsky (1989)
Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 32
-
F. Schmidt (2002)
The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate.Human Performance, 15
-
K. Murphy (1986)
When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests.Psychological Bulletin, 99
-
Huffcut Huffcut (1990)
Intelligence is not a panacea in personnel selectionThe Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 27
-
M. Campion, E. Pursell, B. Brown (1988)
Structured Interviewing: Raising the Psychometric Properties of the Employment Interview.Personnel Psychology, 41
-
Jerald Greenberg (1990)
Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and TomorrowJournal of Management, 16
-
Wayne Cascio, N. Phillips (1979)
PERFORMANCE TESTING: A ROSE AMONG THORNS?Personnel Psychology, 32
-
David Oakes, G. Ferris, Joseph Martocchio, M. Buckley, Dana Broach (2001)
Cognitive Ability and Personality Predictors of Training Program Skill Acquisition and Job PerformanceJournal of Business and Psychology, 15
-
S. Gilliland (1993)
The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 18
-
David Lahuis (2005)
Individual Differences in Applicant Reactions: A Job-Search PerspectiveLabor: Personnel Economics
-
S. Rynes, M. Connerley (1993)
Applicant reactions to alternative selection proceduresJournal of Business and Psychology, 7
-
John Hausknecht, D. Day, Scott Thomas (2004)
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-AnalysisPersonnel Psychology, 57
-
N. Schmitt, R. Gooding, R. Noe, Michael Kirsch (1984)
METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICSPersonnel Psychology, 37
-
I. Robertson, R. Kandola (1982)
Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reactionJournal of occupational psychology, 55
-
F. Lievens, W. Corte, Katrien Brysse (2003)
Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures: The Role of Selection Information, Belief in Tests, and Comparative AnxietyInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11
-
S. Rynes, Robert Bretz, B. Gerhart (2006)
The Importance of Recruitment in Job Choice: A Different Way of LookingPersonnel Psychology, 44
-
Mark Schmit, A. Ryan (1992)
Test-taking dispositions: A missing link?Journal of Applied Psychology, 77
-
N. Anderson (2003)
Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future ResearchIO: Productivity
-
R. Reilly, Georgia Chao (1982)
VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURESPersonnel Psychology, 35
-
G. Powell (1991)
APPLICANT REACTIONS TO THE INITIAL EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: EXPLORING THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUESPersonnel Psychology, 44
-
F. Schmidt (1988)
The Problem of Group Differences in Ability Test Scores in Employment SelectionJournal of Vocational Behavior, 33
-
A. Ryan, Robert Ployhart (2000)
Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the FutureJournal of Management, 26
-
T. Janz (1982)
Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67
-
B. Posner (1981)
COMPARING RECRUITER, STUDENT, AND FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF IMPORTANT APPLICANT AND JOB CHARACTERISTICSPersonnel Psychology, 34
-
J. Crant, Thomas Bateman (1990)
An experimental test of the impact of drug-testing programs on potential job applicants' attitudes and intentions.The Journal of applied psychology, 75 2
-
Murray Barrick, M. Mount (1991)
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 44
-
A. Kluger, H. Rothstein (1993)
The influence of selection test type on applicant reactions to employment testingJournal of Business and Psychology, 8
-
A. Vianen, R. Taris, E. Scholten, S. Schinkel (2004)
Perceived Fairness in Personnel Selection: Determinants and Outcomes in Different Stages of the Assessment ProcedureInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12
-
M. Spence (1973)
Job Market SignalingQuarterly Journal of Economics, 87
-
N. Schmitt, Bryan Coyle (1976)
Applicant decisions in the employment interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61
-
H. Gough (1984)
A managerial potential scale for the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
-
Bible Bible (1990)
When employers look for things other than drugs: The legality of AIDS, genetic, intelligence, and honesty testing in the workplaceLabor Law Journal, 41
-
S. Rynes, H. Heneman, D. Schwab (1980)
INDIVIDUAL REACTIONS TO ORGANIZATIONAL RECRUITING: A REVIEWPersonnel Psychology, 33
-
J. Hunter, Ronda Hunter (1984)
Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job PerformancePsychological Bulletin, 96
-
D. Bartram (2000)
Internet Recruitment and Selection: Kissing Frogs to find PrincesInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8
-
F. Schmidt, Alan Greenthal, J. Hunter, J. Berner, Felecia Seaton (1977)
Job sample vs. paper-and-pencil trades and technical tests: Adverse impact and examinee attitudes.Personnel Psychology, 30
-
J. Silvester, N. Anderson (2003)
Technology and Discourse: A Comparison of Face‐to‐face and Telephone Employment InterviewsInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1993 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
- ISSN
- 0031-5826
- eISSN
- 1744-6570
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00867.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
We note that applicant reactions to selection procedures may be of practical importance to employers because of influences on organizations’attractiveness to candidates, ethical and legal issues, and possible effects on selection procedure validity and utility. In Study 1, after reviewing sample items or brief descriptions of 14 selection tools, newly hired entry‐level managers (n= 110) and recruiting/employment managers (n= 44) judged simulations, interviews, and cognitive tests with relatively concrete item‐types (e.g., vocabulary, standard written English, mathematical word problems) to be significantly more job related than personality, biodata, and cognitive tests with relatively abstract item‐types (e.g., quantitative comparisons, letter sets). A measure of new managers’cognitive abilities was positively correlated with their perceptions of the job relatedness of selection procedures. In Study 2, applicant reactions to a range of entry‐level to professional civil service examinations (assessed immediately after tasting the exam) were positively related to (procedural and distributive) justice perceptions and willingness to recommend the employer to others (assessed one month after the exam, n= 460).
Journal
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1993