Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
María Espinosa‐Goded, J. Barreiro‐Hurlé, E. Ruto (2009)
MODELING FARMERS PREFENCES FOR AGRIENVIRONMENTAL SCHEME DESIGN: A SPANISH CASE STUDY
G. Wilson (1997)
Factors Influencing Farmer Participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas SchemeJournal of Environmental Management, 50
D. Läpple (2010)
Adoption and abandonment of organic farming: an empirical investigation of the Irish drystock sector.Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61
S. Hynes, E. Garvey (2008)
Modelling Structural State Dependency in Agri-Environmental Schemes
J. Cramer, G. Ridder (1991)
POOLING STATES IN THE MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODELJournal of Econometrics, 47
D. Knowler, B. Bradshaw (2007)
Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent researchFood Policy, 32
Takumi Sakuyama (2006)
Direct Payments for Environmental Services from Mountain Agriculture in Japan: Evaluating its Effectiveness and Drawing Lessons for Developing Countries, 3
C. Potter, M. Lobley (1996)
THE FARM FAMILY LIFE CYCLE, SUCCESSION PATHS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE IN BRITAIN'S COUNTRYSIDEJournal of Agricultural Economics, 47
C. Morris, C. Potter (1995)
Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the U.K.Journal of Rural Studies, 11
D. Cox (1972)
Regression Models and Life-TablesJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 34
J. Peerlings, N. Polman (2008)
Agri-environmental schemes in the European Union: the role of ex ante costsEcosystems
S. Saïd, S. Thoyer (2009)
What shapes farmers' attitudes towards agri-environmental payments: A case study in Lozere
Arthur Ha, T. O’Neill, L. Strappazzon, G. Stoneham (2003)
Bush Tender Participation in First Bidding Round: What are the Characteristics of Rural Landholders who Participated?
B. Crabtree, N. Chalmers, Nicholas Barron (1998)
Information for Policy Design: Modelling Participation in a Farm Woodland Incentive SchemeJournal of Agricultural Economics, 49
J. Heckman, B. Singer (1984)
Econometric duration analysisJournal of Econometrics, 24
G. Wilson (1997)
Selective Targeting in Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Implications for Farmers and the EnvironmentJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40
R. Gasson, C. Potter (1988)
CONSERVATION THROUGH LAND DIVERSION: A SURVEY OF FARMERS‘ ATTITUDESJournal of Agricultural Economics, 39
M. Whitby (2008)
Challenges and Options for the UK Agri‐Environment: Presidential AddressJournal of Agricultural Economics, 51
The probability and rate of farmer entry into the Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) scheme were investigated by multinomial logit and duration analysis respectively. Models were based on a survey of 490 farmers sampled from across all ten ESAs in Scotland. The results indicated a number of generic factors as important in explaining the entry decision. Non‐entrants were less aware of and less informed about the scheme than entrants. The probability of entry was increased where the scheme prescription fitted the farm situation and the costs of compliance were low. The duration analysis suggested several factors accelerating scheme entry: an interest in conservation, more adequate information and more extensive systems.
Journal of Agricultural Economics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.