Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Camille Parmesan, Soule E., J. Terborgh (2000)
Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks
J. Levitt, Lydia Bergen (2005)
From Walden to Wall Street : frontiers of conservation finance
(2002)
Conservation in America: State Government Incentives for Habitat Restoration: A Status Report
M. Shaffer, J. Scott, F. Casey (2002)
Noah's Options: Initial Cost Estimates of a National System of Habitat Conservation Areas in the United States, 52
(2005)
Investing in Wildlife: State Wildlife Funding Campaigns
C. Groves, D. Jensen, Laura Valutis, K. Redford, M. Shaffer, J. Scott, Jeffrey Baumgartner, J. Higgins, M. Beck, Mark Anderson (2002)
Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: Putting Conservation Science into Practice, 52
P. Opdam (2004)
Book Review - Drafting a conservation blueprint. A Practitioner's Guide to Planning for Biodiversity Craig R. Groves. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2003, cloth $70, ISBN 1-55963-938-5; paper $35, ISBN 1-55963-939-3Biodiversity & Conservation, 13
A. Balmford, A. Bruner, Philip Cooper, R. Costanza, S. Farber, R. Green, R. Green, M. Jenkins, Paul Jefferiss, Valma Jessamy, J. Madden, K. Munro, N. Myers, S. Naeem, J. Paavola, M. Rayment, S. Rosendo, J. Roughgarden, Kate Trumper, R. Turner (2002)
Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild NatureScience, 297
G. Daily, S. Alexander, P. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P. Matson, H. Mooney, S. Postel, S. Schneider, D. Tilman, G. Woodwell (2007)
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems
(1997)
State and local government funding of land conservation : What is the full potential ?
D. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, E. Losos (1998)
QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATESBioScience, 48
AbstractPrevious estimates of the funding needed to secure a network of habitat conservation areas as defined by conservation planning efforts amount to approximately $5 billion to $8 billion per year over 40 years. We found that US federal and state spending on land conservation—which we use as a surrogate for habitat conservation spending—totaled $32 billion between 1992 and 2001. Moreover, state spending is very uneven geographically, with 80 percent of the investment coming from 20 percent of the states. Most of the federal investment is in short-term land-rental or cost-share programs rather than permanent easements or fee title acquisitions. These results suggest that the federal and state governments are not spending enough to create a network of habitat conservation areas, nor tracking spending or acreage adequately to determine the long-term effectiveness of this habitat conservation investment.
BioScience – Oxford University Press
Published: May 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.