Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta‐regression analysis of solid waste and water services

Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta‐regression... Privatization of local government services is assumed to deliver cost savings, but empirical evidence for this from around the world is mixed. We conduct a meta‐regression analysis of all econometric studies examining privatization of water distribution and solid waste collection services and find no systematic support for lower costs with private production. Differences in study results are explained by differences in time period of the analyses, service characteristics, and policy environment. We do not find a genuine empirical effect of cost savings resulting from private production. The results suggest that to ensure cost savings, more attention be given to the cost characteristics of the service, the transaction costs involved, and the policy environment stimulating competition, rather than to the debate over public versus private delivery of these services. © 2010 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Wiley

Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta‐regression analysis of solid waste and water services

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/is-private-production-of-public-services-cheaper-than-public-SJYUcQT6Id

References (109)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2010 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management
ISSN
0276-8739
eISSN
1520-6688
DOI
10.1002/pam.20509
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Privatization of local government services is assumed to deliver cost savings, but empirical evidence for this from around the world is mixed. We conduct a meta‐regression analysis of all econometric studies examining privatization of water distribution and solid waste collection services and find no systematic support for lower costs with private production. Differences in study results are explained by differences in time period of the analyses, service characteristics, and policy environment. We do not find a genuine empirical effect of cost savings resulting from private production. The results suggest that to ensure cost savings, more attention be given to the cost characteristics of the service, the transaction costs involved, and the policy environment stimulating competition, rather than to the debate over public versus private delivery of these services. © 2010 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Journal

Journal of Policy Analysis and ManagementWiley

Published: Jun 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.