Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Howard Lavine, T. Gschwend (2006)
Issues, Party and Character: The Moderating Role of Ideological Thinking on Candidate EvaluationBritish Journal of Political Science, 37
E. Carmines, J. Stimson (1989)
Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics
A. Lupia, Mathew McCubbins, Samuel Popkin (2000)
Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality
H. Weiner, R. Nisbett, L. Ross (1981)
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76
Thomas Nelson, Zoe Oxley, R. Clawson (1997)
Toward a Psychology of Framing EffectsPolitical Behavior, 19
John Aldrich (1995)
Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in AmericaThe Journal of American History, 83
Kira Sanbonmatsu (2002)
Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Place
Durairaj Maheswaran, S. Chaiken (1991)
Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 61 1
C. Hovland, I. Janis, H. Kelley (1953)
Communication And Persuasion
Joshua Clinton, J. Lapinski (2004)
“Targeted” Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential ElectionThe Journal of Politics, 66
R. Lau, David Redlawsk (2001)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 45
J. Krosnick (1988)
The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: a study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior.Journal of personality and social psychology, 55 2
J. Kuklinski, N. Hurley (1994)
On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-TakingThe Journal of Politics, 56
G. Miller, N. Cantor (1982)
Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Social Cognition, 1
A. Lupia, Mathew McCubbins (1998)
The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?
S. Chaiken, A. Liberman, A. H. Eagly (1989)
Unintended thought
A. Campbell, P. Converse, Warren Miller, Donald Stokes (1960)
The American voterAmerican Journal of Psychology, 74
J. Kuklinski, P. Quirk (2000)
Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion
Wendy Rahn (1993)
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political CandidatesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 37
L. M. Bartels (2003)
Electoral democracy
J. Druckman (2001)
Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing EffectsJournal of Law Economics & Organization, 17
M. Carpini, S. Keeter (1996)
What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
A. Lupia (1994)
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 88
Donald Stokes (1963)
Spatial Models of Party CompetitionAmerican Political Science Review, 57
Thomas Nelson, R. Clawson, Zoe Oxley (1997)
Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on ToleranceAmerican Political Science Review, 91
J. Druckman (2001)
On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?The Journal of Politics, 63
A. Downs (1957)
An Economic Theory of Democracy
D. Green, Bradley Palmquist, E. Schickler (2002)
Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters
J. Zaller (1992)
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Contents
Thomas Nelson, J. Garst (2005)
Values‐based Political Messages and Persuasion: Relationships among Speaker, Recipient, and Evoked ValuesPolitical Psychology, 26
Micahael Tomz, J. Wittenberg, Gary King (2003)
Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical ResultsJournal of Statistical Software, 8
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1986)
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
J. Snyder, Michael Ting (2002)
An Informational Rationale for Political PartiesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 46
J. Zaller (1992)
The nature and origins of mass opinion
V. Price, J. Zaller (1993)
WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCHPublic Opinion Quarterly, 57
Kai Arzheimer (2007)
Angus Campbell/Philip E. Converse/Warren E. Miller/Donald E. Stokes, The American Voter, New York 1960
Michael Cobb, J. Kuklinski (1997)
Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 41
Cindy Kam (2005)
Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual DifferencesPolitical Behavior, 27
S. Chaiken, A. Liberman, A. Eagly (1989)
Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context.
Jeffery Mondak (1993)
Source Cues and Policy Approval: The Cognitive Dynamics of Public Support for the Reagan AgendaAmerican Journal of Political Science, 37
Larry Bartels (1996)
Uninformed Votes: Information E ects in Presidential Elections
J. Druckman (2001)
The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen CompetencePolitical Behavior, 23
G. Adams (1997)
Abortion: Evidence of an Issue EvolutionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 41
Kevin Smith, C. Larimer, L. Littvay, John Hibbing (2007)
Evolutionary Theory and Political Leadership: Why Certain People Do Not Trust Decision MakersThe Journal of Politics, 69
R. R. Lau, D. P. Redlawsk (1997)
Voting correctlyAmerican Political Science Review, 91
E. Carmines, James Stimson (1980)
The Two Faces of Issue VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 74
Donald Haider‐Markel, M. Joslyn (2001)
Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue FramesThe Journal of Politics, 63
Jeffery Mondak (1999)
Reconsidering the Measurement of Political KnowledgePolitical Analysis, 8
P. Brewer (2001)
Value Words and Lizard Brains: Do Citizens Deliberate About Appeals to Their Core Values?Political Psychology, 22
Thomas Brambor, W. Clark, Matt Golder (2006)
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical AnalysesPolitical Analysis, 14
A. Abramowitz (1995)
It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential ElectionThe Journal of Politics, 57
When evaluating political candidates, citizens can draw on partisan stereotypes and use partisan cues to make inferences about the candidates’ issue positions without undertaking a costly information search. As long as candidates adopt policy positions that are congruent with partisan stereotypes, partisan cues can help citizens make an accurate voting decision with limited information. However, if candidates take counter-stereotypical positions, it is incumbent upon citizens to recognize it and adjust their evaluations accordingly. Using the dual-processing framework, I hypothesize about the conditions under which individuals reduce their reliance on partisan cues and scrutinize counter-stereotypical messages, and test these hypotheses with experimental data collected from a nationally representative sample of adults. The findings show that whether individuals punish a candidate from their party for taking a counter-stereotypical position is contingent on the salience of the issue and the political awareness of the message recipient. The article concludes with a discussion of the theoretical and normative implications of these findings.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 27, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.