Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF CORRIDOR EFFECTS ON BUTTERFLY DENSITIES

AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF CORRIDOR EFFECTS ON BUTTERFLY DENSITIES In a large-scale experiment, we found that three habitat-restricted butterfly species reached higher densities in patches connected by corridors than in similar, isolated patches. We conducted our study in 27 equal-sized (1.64-ha) patches that varied in whether or not they were connected to another patch by a corridor. Patches and corridors were open, early-successional habitat that contrasted strongly with the surrounding pine forest. Of four butterfly species studied, three open-habitat specialists ( Junonia coenia, Euptoieta claudia, and Phoebis sennae ) reached higher densities in patches connected by corridors than in isolated patches. A fourth species, Papilio troilus, showed no preference for open habitat or pine forest, and its density did not differ in connected or isolated patches. Although butterfly densities were often significantly, positively associated with densities of host plant or flower resources, plant densities did not confound corridor effects on butterfly densities. Higher densities in patches connected by corridors may have been caused by three different factors. First, species with higher densities in connected patches also moved more frequently between connected patches, and higher movement rates may have helped to sustain higher population sizes. Second, species with higher densities in connected patches also had higher densities farther from the forest edge. Corridors increased the area of a patch that was farther from the forest edge, which increased the ““effective area”” of connected patches and may have increased butterfly densities. Third, corridors may have acted as ““drift fences,”” intercepting dispersers from the surrounding forest and directing them to connected patches. We could not determine the relative contribution of each factor, and it is possible that all three contributed to higher densities of habitat-restricted butterflies in patches connected by corridors. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecological Applications Ecological Society of America

AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF CORRIDOR EFFECTS ON BUTTERFLY DENSITIES

Ecological Applications , Volume 9 (2) – May 1, 1999

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ecological-society-of-america/an-experimental-test-of-corridor-effects-on-butterfly-densities-P7PGrgmmvG

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Ecological Society of America
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Ecological Society of America
Subject
Articles
ISSN
1051-0761
DOI
10.1890/1051-0761%281999%29009%5B0623:AETOCE%5D2.0.CO%3B2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In a large-scale experiment, we found that three habitat-restricted butterfly species reached higher densities in patches connected by corridors than in similar, isolated patches. We conducted our study in 27 equal-sized (1.64-ha) patches that varied in whether or not they were connected to another patch by a corridor. Patches and corridors were open, early-successional habitat that contrasted strongly with the surrounding pine forest. Of four butterfly species studied, three open-habitat specialists ( Junonia coenia, Euptoieta claudia, and Phoebis sennae ) reached higher densities in patches connected by corridors than in isolated patches. A fourth species, Papilio troilus, showed no preference for open habitat or pine forest, and its density did not differ in connected or isolated patches. Although butterfly densities were often significantly, positively associated with densities of host plant or flower resources, plant densities did not confound corridor effects on butterfly densities. Higher densities in patches connected by corridors may have been caused by three different factors. First, species with higher densities in connected patches also moved more frequently between connected patches, and higher movement rates may have helped to sustain higher population sizes. Second, species with higher densities in connected patches also had higher densities farther from the forest edge. Corridors increased the area of a patch that was farther from the forest edge, which increased the ““effective area”” of connected patches and may have increased butterfly densities. Third, corridors may have acted as ““drift fences,”” intercepting dispersers from the surrounding forest and directing them to connected patches. We could not determine the relative contribution of each factor, and it is possible that all three contributed to higher densities of habitat-restricted butterflies in patches connected by corridors.

Journal

Ecological ApplicationsEcological Society of America

Published: May 1, 1999

Keywords: butterfly ; conservation ; corridors ; edge effects ; habitat fragmentation ; landscape experiment ; patch colonization ; population densities ; population dynamics

There are no references for this article.