Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Hugh Caffey (1982)
No effect of naturally-occurring rock types on settlement or survival in the intertidal barnacle, Tesseropora rosea (Krauss)Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 63
(1999)
biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scale. Biological Conservation
S. Freitag, A. Jaarsveld (1998)
Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledgeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265
R. Thackway (1996)
Developing Australia's Representative System of Marine Protected Areas: Criteria and Guidelines for Identification and Selection
P. Jernakoff (1985)
Temporal and Small-scale Spatial Variability of Algal Abundance on an Intertidal Rocky Shore, 28
A. Underwood, M. Chapman (1998)
Variation in algal assemblages on wave-exposed rocky shores in New South WalesMarine and Freshwater Research, 49
(1999)
WORLDMAP iv Windows: Software and Help Document 4.1. Privately distributed, London
C. Margules, A. Nicholls, R. Pressey (1988)
Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversityBiological Conservation, 43
A.T. Lombard, C. Hilton-Taylor, A.G. Rebelo, R.L. Pressey, R.M. Cowling (1999)
Reserve selection in the Succulent Karoo: coping with high compositional turnoverPlant Ecology, 142
A. Magurran (1990)
Ecological Diversity and Its MeasurementBiometrics, 46
D. Yurick (1995)
Towards a Marine Regionalisation for Australia
(1999)
Afrotropical antelopes. Conservation Biology
R. Pressey, H. Possingham, V. Logan, J. Day, P. Williams (1999)
Effects of data characteristics on the results of reserve selection algorithmsJournal of Biogeography, 26
P. Hopkinson, J. Travis, Julianne Evans, R. Gregory, M. Telfer, P. Williams (2001)
Flexibility and the use of indicator taxa in the selection of sites for nature reservesBiodiversity & Conservation, 10
A. Rodrigues, K. Gaston (2001)
How large do reserve networks need to beEcology Letters, 4
M. Vanderklift, T. Ward, J. Phillips (1998)
Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversityBiological Conservation, 86
B. Reyers, A. Jaarsveld, M. Krüger (2000)
Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategyProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
(1995)
Development of a marine protected area system planning regional framework in Canada. In: Muldoon J (ed) Towards a Marine Regionalisation for Australia, pp 13-32
E. Pharo, A. Beattie, R. Pressey (2000)
Effectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichensBiological Conservation, 96
W. Gladstone (2002)
The potential value of indicator groups in the selection of marine reservesBiological Conservation, 104
K. Astles (1993)
Patterns of abundance and distribution of species in intertidal rock poolsJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73
W. Gladstone, N. Tawfiq, D. Nasr, I. Andersen, C. Cheung, H. Drammeh, F. Krupp, S. Lintner (1999)
Sustainable use of renewable resources and conservation in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden: issues, needs and strategic actionsOcean & Coastal Management, 42
A. Jaarsveld, Stefanie Freitag, S. Chown, Caron Muller, Stephanie Koch, H. Hull, Chuck Bellamy, Martin Krüger, Sebastian Endrödy-Younga, M. Mansell, Clarke Scholtz (1998)
Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategiesScience, 279 5359
A. Balmford, A. Jayasuriya, M. Green (1996)
Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: II. Local applicationsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 263
T. Ward, M. Vanderklift, A. Nicholls, R. Kenchington (1999)
SELECTING MARINE RESERVES USING HABITATS AND SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AS SURROGATES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYEcological Applications, 9
P. Archambault, E. Bourget (1996)
Scales of coastal heterogeneity and benthic intertidal species richness, diversity and abundanceMarine Ecology Progress Series, 136
(1999)
Strategic Plan of Action for the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas: A Guide for Action by Australian Governments
(1995)
The New Zealand experience in developing a marine biogeographic regionalisation
R. Ryti (1992)
Effect of the Focal Taxon on the Selection of Nature Reserves.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2 4
A. Lombard, C. Hilton‐Taylor, A. Rebelo, R. Pressey, R. Cowling (1999)
Reserve selection in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa: coping with high compositional turnoverPlant Ecology, 142
S. Ferrier, R. Pressey, T. Barrett (2000)
A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinementBiological Conservation, 93
T. O’hara (2001)
Consistency of faunal and floral assemblages within temperate subtidal rocky reef habitatsMarine and Freshwater Research, 52
G. Kelleher (1995)
A Global representative system of marine protected areasOcean & Coastal Management, 32
(1996)
Developing consistent national criteria for the identification and selection of a national representative system of marine protected areas
A. Balmford, A. Lyon, R. Lang (2000)
Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi.Biological Conservation, 93
(1995)
Development of a marine protected area system planning regional framework in Canada
M. Kershaw, G. Mace, Paul Williams (1995)
Threatened Status, Rarity, and Diversity as Alternative Selection Measures for Protected Areas: A Test Using Afrotropical AntelopesConservation Biology, 9
M. Keough, G. Quinn, Rachael Bathgate (1997)
Geographic variation in interactions between size classes of the limpet Cellana tramosericaJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 215
C. Margules, R. Pressey (2000)
Systematic conservation planningNature, 405
R. Pressey, I. Johnson, Peter Wilson (1994)
Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goalBiodiversity & Conservation, 3
C. Willis, A. Lombard, R. Cowling, B. Heydenrych, C. Burgers (1996)
Reserve systems for limestone endemic flora of the Cape Lowland Fynbos: Iterative versus linear programmingBiological Conservation, 77
P. Howard, P. Viskanic, T. Davenport, F. Kigenyi, M. Baltzer, C. Dickinson, J. Lwanga, R. Matthews, A. Balmford (1998)
Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in UgandaNature, 394
(1999)
WORLDMAP iv Windows : Software and Help Document 4 . 1
(1997)
Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia: An Ecosystem-Based Classification for Marine and Coastal Environments Version 3.2
(1999)
This is a contribution from the Centre for Sustainable Use of Coasts and Catchments, University of Newcastle, Australia. References ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation
K. McGuinness (1988)
Explaining patterns in abundances of organisms on boulders: the failure of 'natural experiments'Marine Ecology Progress Series, 48
(1999)
Applications of irreplaceability analysis to planning and management problems
B. Csuti, S. Polasky, P. Williams, R. Pressey, J. Camm, M. Kershaw, A. Kiester, Brian Downs, Richard Hamilton, M. Huso, K. Sahr (1997)
A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in OregonBiological Conservation, 80
K. Wessels, S. Freitag, A. Jaarsveld (1999)
The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scaleBiological Conservation, 89
(1988)
Causes of spatial and temporal patterns in rocky intertidal communities of central and northern California
A. Underwood, M. Chapman (1998)
Spatial analyses of intertidal assemblages on sheltered rocky shoresAustral Ecology, 23
There has been much interest in the potential of short-cuts in biodiversity surveys (e.g. physical surrogates, indicator groups, and lower taxonomic resolution) in systematic processes to select networks of representative marine reserves. This study tested the consequences for reserve selection of reducing survey intensity in intertidal rocky shores in southeast Australia. Using a reference data set of species' distributions based on surveys of two replicate sites in each of 15 locations, a reduction in survey intensity was simulated by randomly eliminating the data from one of the replicate sites in each location. A complementarity-based reserve selection algorithm was used to determine the number of locations required to represent all species once in a reserve network and the irreplaceability value of locations. A reduction in survey intensity led to increases in: the size of reserve networks (of between 8 and 17%); the irreplaceability value of locations; and the number of irreplaceable locations. These changes were caused by a reduction in the observed range sizes of species in the data sets simulating a reduced survey intensity.
Biodiversity and Conservation – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 5, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.