Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Mcneil (1963)
Psychology and war: a review : Leonard Berkowitz, Aggression: A Social Psychological AnalysisJournal of Conflict Resolution, 7
M. Mulder, Ad Stemerding (1963)
Threat, Attraction to Group, and Need for Strong LeadershipHuman Relations, 16
Schachter Schachter (1964)
Birth order and sociometric choiceJ. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 68
C. join (1966)
Ordinal Position and Sociometric Status, 29
P. Rosenblatt (1964)
Origins and effects of group ethnocentrism and nationalismJournal of Conflict Resolution, 8
W. Wilson, N. Miller (1961)
Shifts in evaluations of participants following intergroup competition.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 63
S. Schachter (1959)
The Psychology Of Affiliation
M. Sherif (1962)
Intergroup Relations And Leadership
Fred Hedler (1967)
THE EFFECT OF INTER-GROUP COMPETITION ON GROUP MEMBER ADJUSTMENTPersonnel Psychology, 20
Ferguson Ferguson, Kelley Kelley (1966)
Significant factors in overevaluation of own group's productJ. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 69
J. Rabbie, M. Horwitz (1969)
Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss.Journal of personality and social psychology, 13 3
M. Deutsch (1949)
An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group ProcessHuman Relations, 2
H. Kelley (1951)
Communication in Experimentally Created HierarchiesHuman Relations, 4
B. Bettelheim, M. Janowitz (1950)
Dynamics Of Prejudice
B. Bass, G. Dunteman (1963)
Biases in the evaluation of one's own group, its allies and opponentsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 7
F. Heider (1958)
The psychology of interpersonal relations
R. Blake, J. Mouton (1962)
Overevaluation of own group's product in intergroup competition.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 64
P. Green, B. Winer, Donald Brown, K. Michels (1963)
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
C. Ferguson, H. Kelley (1964)
SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN OVEREVALUATION OF OWN-GROUP'S PRODUCT.Journal of abnormal psychology, 69
S. Schachter (1964)
BIRTH ORDER AND SOCIOMETRIC CHOICE.Journal of abnormal psychology, 68
Seventy‐two male subjects from lower technical schools were divided into groups of three and assigned to three conditions in which they expected to work together in competition with another group, to work together but independently of the other group, or did not anticipate to work together at all. Subjects who anticipated working together showed a more favorable attitude toward their group and its members than subjects who did not. Moreover, actual social interaction increased in‐group attractiveness. Intergroup competition led to a more differentiated leadership structure and a greater consensus about the distribution of influence in the group. Contrary to our predictions, intergroup competition produced no greater in‐group solidarity, nor any over‐evaluation of the group's product. Low influence persons felt comparatively more positive about their group even before they actually had the opportunity to work together. An attempt was made to relate this finding to the ordinal position of the low status figure, his affiliative tendencies under stress, and his greater social dependence.
European Journal of Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1971
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.