Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Daily (1995)
The Relationship Between Board Composition and Leadership Structure and Bankruptcy Reorganization OutcomesJournal of Management, 21
P. Collier, M. Zaman (2005)
Convergence in European Corporate Governance: The Audit Committee ConceptFinancial Accounting
Phyllis Keys, Joanne Li (2005)
Evidence On The Market For Professional DirectorsJournal of Financial Research, 28
Joseph Carcello, T. Neal (2003)
Audit Committee Independence and Disclosure: Choice for Financially Distressed FirmsFinancial Accounting
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Weisbach (2000)
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic LiteratureERN: Governance & Ownership (Topic)
D. Yermack (1996)
Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directorsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
F. DeZoort, D. Hermanson, Deborah Archambeault, S. Reed (2002)
Audit Committee Effectiveness: A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee LiteratureJournal of Accounting Literature, 21
Joanne Li, James Ang (2000)
Quantity versus quality of directors’ time: the effectiveness of directors and number of outside directorshipsManagerial Finance, 26
A. Felo, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Steven Solieri (2003)
Audit Committee Characteristics and the Perceived Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical AnalysisLabor: Personnel Economics
Collier Collier, Zaman Zaman (2005)
Convergence in european corporate governance: The audit committee conceptCorporate Governance: An International Review, 13
M. Beasley, Steven Salterio (2001)
The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and ExperienceContemporary Accounting Research, 18
(2002)
I am watching,
D. Carter, B. Simkins, W. Simpson (2002)
Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm PerformanceS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Joseph Carcello, D. Hermanson, T. Neal, Richard Riley (2000)
Board Characteristics and Audit FeesSEIN Corporate Governance & Accountability eJournal
Jennifer Conrad, Gautam Kaul (1993)
Long‐Term Market Overreaction or Biases in Computed Returns?Journal of Finance, 48
James Hall, Stephen Liedtka (2007)
The Sarbanes-Oxley ActCommunications of the ACM, 50
D. Carter, B. Simkins, W. Simpson (2003)
Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm ValueThe Financial Review, 38
L. Fairchild, Joanne Li (2005)
Director Quality and Firm PerformanceThe Financial Review, 40
M. Ammann, David Oesch, Markus Schmid (2010)
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: International EvidenceIO: Firm Structure
James Booth, D. Deli (1996)
Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
Carcello Carcello, Hermanson Hermanson, Neal Neal, Riley Riley (2002)
Board characteristics and audit feesContemporary Accounting Research, 19
Kee Chung, Stephen Pruitt (1994)
A Simple Approximation of Tobin's QCorporate Finance: Valuation
J. Byrd, Kent Hickman (1992)
Do outside directors monitor managersJournal of Financial Economics, 32
Adam Pritchard, Stephen Ferris, Murali Jagannathan (2002)
Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board AppointmentsCorporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal
Carcello Carcello, Neal Neal (2003)
Audit committee independence and disclosure: Choice for financially distressed firmsCorporate Governance: An International Review, 11
Mark Defond, Rebecca Hann, Xuesong Hu (2004)
Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal
Biao Xie, Wallace Davidson, Peter Dadalt (2001)
Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Roles of the Board and the Audit CommitteeCorporate Finance: Governance
Carter Carter, Simkins Simkins, Simpson Simpson (2003)
Corporate governance, board diversity and firm performanceFinance Review, 38
(2002)
TIAA-CREF policy statement on corporate governance (1997) New York. The Corporate Library's Board Analyst Database
Chung Chung, Pruitt Pruitt (1994)
A simple approximation of Tobin's qFinancial Management, 23
ABSTRACT Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: We examine the relation between independence of audit committee and firm value with a sample of Fortune 200 companies. Research Findings/Insights: Using a sample of Fortune 200 companies and defining top executives of other publicly traded firms as expert‐independent directors and controlling for firm specifics, board features, and individual director characteristics, we find the presence of expert‐independent directors on board and in the audit committee enhances firm value. Theoretical/Academic Implications: We provide empirical evidence to show that by focusing on this restricted definition of independent directors (expert‐independent directors), we are able to examine independence in both the board and audit committee in a different light. Practitioner/Policy Implications: We offer new insights to relate firm value of the composition of audit committee. When expert‐independent directors are of majority control of audit committee, finance‐trained directors improve firm value almost five times to that of firms with independent audit committee alone.
Corporate Governance – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.