Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

EYE‐CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION: A RE‐EVALUATION

EYE‐CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION: A RE‐EVALUATION Argyle & Dean (1965) presented and tested the affiliative–conflict theory of eye‐contact and the Intimacy model which stems from it. Their finding that, as the distance between subjects in a dyadic discussion increased, recorded eye‐contact increased, was held to support the theory and model, and has assumed a central place in Argyle's work on social skill. The present experiment tests the hypothesis that, with increasing distance, gaze directed at the ear and shoulder is increasingly recorded as eye‐contact by observers in the Argyle & Dean situation. The hypothesis is strongly confirmed: recorded eye‐contact increases with distance but as a function of observer performance, not subject performance. It is suggested that Argyle & Dean's results may have been an artifact of observer performance, not subject performance. Implications both for the methodology of work on eye‐contact and for the models of Intimacy and social skill are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png British Journal of Psychology Wiley

EYE‐CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION: A RE‐EVALUATION

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/eye-contact-distance-and-affiliation-a-re-evaluation-OW0zRUDlXG

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1970 The British Psychological Society
ISSN
0007-1269
eISSN
2044-8295
DOI
10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01257.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Argyle & Dean (1965) presented and tested the affiliative–conflict theory of eye‐contact and the Intimacy model which stems from it. Their finding that, as the distance between subjects in a dyadic discussion increased, recorded eye‐contact increased, was held to support the theory and model, and has assumed a central place in Argyle's work on social skill. The present experiment tests the hypothesis that, with increasing distance, gaze directed at the ear and shoulder is increasingly recorded as eye‐contact by observers in the Argyle & Dean situation. The hypothesis is strongly confirmed: recorded eye‐contact increases with distance but as a function of observer performance, not subject performance. It is suggested that Argyle & Dean's results may have been an artifact of observer performance, not subject performance. Implications both for the methodology of work on eye‐contact and for the models of Intimacy and social skill are discussed.

Journal

British Journal of PsychologyWiley

Published: Aug 1, 1970

There are no references for this article.